Author Topic: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?  (Read 20615 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #56 on: December 27, 2015, 20:20:52 pm »
http://uspas.fnal.gov/materials/09UNM/ResonantCavities.pdf

Resonant cavities may have dielectric medium inside, and obviously act as RC oscillator

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #57 on: December 27, 2015, 20:52:00 pm »
TGS : Put your fat a*s  out of this topic, you dont respect others opinion, so you are not adding anything to the research, please stay away from this topic.

Better any Moderator CLOSE THIS TOPIC.

Where is the calculation of the resonant cavity? do you even know any principle about what it is and how it works?

I will continue my research by myself offline without "interferences" of the "smart" men like TGS.

See you soon.

You see my point, this guy shows up to apple hill with an assortment of nuts and wonders why we are all looking at him funny.

Here is yet another person showing a B+ and a B- voltage being applied to his water fuel capacitor. Again the voltages aren't as balanced as they could be but it is workable and "we" can compare notes as we have brought apples to apple hill.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk2IutZfi6o

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #58 on: December 27, 2015, 21:06:26 pm »
No problem man i will figure it out.. good luck

thanks anyway
« Last Edit: December 27, 2015, 21:23:38 pm by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #59 on: December 27, 2015, 23:44:36 pm »
TGS you are making mistakes again posting in this topic, there is another split "who is right discussion" on the forum. lets discuss some point of view

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #60 on: December 28, 2015, 00:03:11 am »
TGS you are making mistakes again posting in this topic, there is another split "who is right discussion" on the forum. lets discuss some point of view

Right, lets back to subject

xBlade can you make some more clear scope shots? i could not really see what you have going there..

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #61 on: December 28, 2015, 00:06:34 am »
Here we go again!

Some people over this foruns said its impossible to get the step-charging effect without tube coatings... here is the proof,
Check my new scope shots:


1. Step-Charge over the cell
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step0001.jpg)]



2. Upside:     Channel 1 - across the cell
    Downside: Channel 2 - Pulse train applied to the transistor
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step0003.jpg)

Feel free tgo ask and comment.

what is the voltage potential of the cell?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #62 on: December 28, 2015, 00:48:46 am »
This is to kill some disinformation that water capacitor cant charge with direct electrodes to water. Each pulse of train voltage rises to some limit that maintain the maximum level when you apply more pulses per train, only that.
Ed (TGS) started immediatly throwing "sh*t to the fan" and got it back, as expected.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #63 on: December 28, 2015, 07:01:23 am »
He has no potential voltage it's all positive. That is what I keep trying to point out to him he only has a B+ voltage and no B- voltage. The voltage is no more than 24-50 volts if that. He is so far away from what Meyer is doing he might as well make a new patent.

I pointed out just what Meyer says about needing an equal B+ and B- voltage trying to help him and lead him out of the ditch but he likes being in the ditch getting pats on the back for doing absolutely nothing near to what Meyer was doing. I show him others that are also getting good results since the sight of my work offends him but it seems all of our work offends him be it Don Gable, Outlawstc, Max Miller, Ronnie, Neal, Russ, and anyone else getting similar results as it doesn't matter we all suck in his book.

He ask a question, "Am I on the right way?" and doesn't like the answers he is getting. Reading this tells us we need both a B+ and B- voltage to get the electrical polarization process to take place. And for those that don't like what Meyer named this process tough as he gave his life for this technology so show some respect!

(http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y320/h2opower/2015-11-25_031811_zpsh5d681p4.png)

This video above all others Meyer really gave a lot of good information about this technology away for those who have an ear to hear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGqCaVFWIWQ