Author Topic: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?  (Read 20576 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 624
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #24 on: December 25, 2015, 19:32:41 pm »
Why wont you put us at ease there TGS and give us some gas readings.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #25 on: December 25, 2015, 22:04:13 pm »
I am still waiting for the "tremenduous amount of hydrogen and oxygen gases" as Stan stated.
TGS can't show any usable production and come here to critisize and desencourage others.
I dont want to see more SH** from TGS until he show some good production with his mixed setup.

My setup produces more with 24v@100ma than TGS with 7kv.

Until that day, better stay away from my topic.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #26 on: December 25, 2015, 23:34:02 pm »
Why wont you put us at ease there TGS and give us some gas readings.


I might give some MMW numbers but as far as putting on a show for you all with the way you treat me and real science I don't think so. Thus far none of you have been able to surpass the gas production seen in this video with your efforts to reproduce Meyer's technology;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW78gKn1ZZ0

And this is the waveform that goes along with the experiment:

(http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y320/h2opower/GasProcessorfinalassembly005-2.jpg)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2015, 00:05:40 am »
Where is the Ammeter?

We need to know exactly how many amps, and volts or the power (W).

Your scope shot shows 196V max

How about amp load?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #28 on: December 26, 2015, 00:12:23 am »
OH GOD! AMAZING!

You're wasting near to 420W (based on the video description) of electrical power! PRISE TO LORD!

And wasting our time with your pathetic interpretations of stanley meyer stuff.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 624
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #29 on: December 26, 2015, 01:53:06 am »
OH God! AMAZING!

You're wasting near to 420W (based on the video description) of electrical power! PRISE TO LORD!

And wasting our time with your pathetic interpretations of stanley meyer stuff.

Im glad he posted that X-Blade,  maybe his fans will reconsider the bullshit that spews from his keyboard warrior fingers.BTW....

Merry Christmas !!!!

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #30 on: December 26, 2015, 09:49:52 am »
You all just summed up what is total wrong with Open Source sites as it all about competition as none of you are willing to learn a thing when you see someone doing something you yourselves can not do.

Lets look at just what it takes to get the Electrical Polarization Process working according to Stanley Meyer. Meyer states that it takes 1kv or more per resonant cavity to get the process started. Now if you have an exciter array with 11 resonant cavities wired in series that is going to take 11kv or more to get it to work correctly and if you have one with 10 resonant cavities wired in series it's going to take 10kv or more to get it to work correctly. With a show of hands tell me which of you has ever gotten close to placing voltages this high on your exciter arrays.

I show voltages that are getting close to this benchmark voltage Meyer says is what it takes to get the Electrical Polarization Process stated but since these Open Source forums are all about competition no one ask just how the heck did I do that but instead get mad at me for getting close to the benchmark voltage Meyer has set for us to reach. Some even resort to lying about their work to make it appear they are getting higher voltages than me not understanding that their lies are over the benchmark voltage Meyer gave for us to reach but there setups aren't working correctly. These lies put them in a difficult position in the either they are lying to us or Stanley A. Meyer is lying to us and if it is the ladder then why the hell are we following his work?!!

You talk about that video as if I ran the experiment yesterday but it was ran many years ago using the 8xa circuit and the kicker is your work can't surpass those results and again you get mad for someone calling you out like this instead of asking questions of just what it was did I do to get this 1LPM of gas production using an 8xa circuit with pure distilled water.  Yeah, it's only a little more than 1LPM but none of you have surpass this as of yet, not Max, not Russ, not anyone other than someone calling himself spaceman. But you like to rag on people as somehow it makes you feel good about yourselves but never show your work in a presentable manor. Why is that? What are you afraid of?

The bigger question is why isn't Open Source working what is wrong with it's view on getting this technology up and running and out to the masses? The answer to this question can be seen anywhere my work gets posted as instead of asking question these type of forums move to rag on you instead of trying to advance their work. They only care for getting pats on the back when they think they have done something right and get really upset when someone shows them Meyer's own words that makes what they are showing us to be incorrect. They ask, "am I on the right way?" and when they get an honest answer that tells them they are not they get all bent out of shape about it instead of asking how can they correct their work so that it matches up with what Stanley Meyer talks about in his lecture videos. Open Source doesn't work as it got taken over by a bunch of Blind Leaders who can care less about the truth as long as they can get some pats on the back from their blind followers.

But again I ask you to show me anyone else working on this technology that is getting more than 1 LPM? Sure that is crappy gas production but to the best of my knowledge not many has reached this level of gas production with their work on Stanley A. Meyer's technology. Since this is a competition based site and not a learning based site someone please show me gas production greater than that old 8xa circuit video of mines. Surely after what was just said here you can show your work doing a whole lot better than this, correct? Common show your work or is a waveform that is incorrect the best you all have to show for your work?

But since I know you are really hear to rag and not to learn here is another video showing even more gas production as I started to learn how to actually get high voltage to my water fuel capacitor. My learning at this point was below basic concerning this technology but by making use of the scientific method I was able to learn from my early work and keep increasing the voltage being applied to the water fuel capacitor to over 9kv now. Oh, almost forgot, since you like amp load readings at 9kv the amps flowing through the water fuel capacitor are only 0.6mA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NrBEnRtHoE
« Last Edit: December 26, 2015, 10:05:14 am by TGS »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
« Reply #31 on: December 26, 2015, 11:57:20 am »
Hello guys i would just like to drop my two cents,

in my tests i can go up to 100v applied to the primary at 5 amps... the mean 500w and seriously i wish i could see others being able to do so... because it mean you break the technological step to be able to apply at least power to try to do something...

i have found how is hard to put power at the correct point... the pll helps with that but the point really is if you are not capable of circuit design after are 12v 3 amps you will start to get in trouble... so is sometimes very good to see others devices to understand how they have overcome the difficulties... i posted here my secret in getting power to it... who  reads what i wrote may have noticed...

 I really hates competition i believe in sharing my thoughts and ideas willing to have someone who understand it and can help develop them if possible... i´m not anyones competidor nor teacher... i´m here for learning the most i can and to change with you all I can.. Sorry if i sometimes won't post so detail info.. in my opinion we are not alone here and we must prevent this technology also to get the wrong hands... i think you would understand what i mean not them as you have the right mind spirit for understanding my ideas.. if i explained in a way more profound probably anyone could understand..

you guys helped me a lot in the sense that if there wasn't anyone to exchange any idea probably most of us would have stopped working on it by lack of motivation... For me is very motivation to see you here present working and discussing, even in a bad manner we are together.. we say family fights but after all we are all brothers!

Now take a look on a microwave oven and check what is a magnetron and what is a resonant cavity!