So my truth telling is considered verbal abuse huh? Interesting. It just goes to shows how far people actually are from the truth of this technology. As for following you around talk to Steve as he has the history behind why I returned to this forum and you will be surprised to find out it has nothing to do with you.
Everything I ever said about your version of this technology was true as with this technology you don't have a pot or a window to throw it out of. You don't have a WFC built to Meyer's standards, you don't have a differential probe, you don't have a properly built VIC transformer, need I go on? You have nothing but a bunch of untested ideas being compared to my actual experimental data with all the said components. These are the facts are they not? I have built all of these things and have been running experiments on them getting results that no one else is getting currently working on this technology. These results when explained sound just like Meyer's words on how this technology actually works from his descriptions... you know high voltage while restricting the flow of amps and the water bath not heating up over time and all of that.
I'd make real important breakthroughs that would help everyone get their set ups running like Meyer's words describes and you would treat them as nothing of importance telling everyone there was nothing to see here. But unknown to you some did give what I was showing a try and got the exact same results I was getting by getting high voltage while restricting the flow of amps into the mA range after they gave what I was showing everyone a try while ignoring you. You see what makes me different is I am running experiments that everyone can follow given they are willing to build this technology using the information given to us by Don Gable and get the necessary test equipment needed to be able to read and view this technology. My work can be followed and those that have followed it are getting the exact same results I am getting which in the world of science is known as second source verification. I do things by trial and error making use of the scientific method to solve problems and then try again and repeat until I get it right. Why on earth you, or anyone else, would resist this type of hands on approach is beyond me?
In a heated debate between one of Max's supporters I got them to admit that I am the only one, other than those that chose to follow my work, that is showing voltages this high being applied to the water fuel cell while restricting the flow of amps at the same time right now. Which shows there are some good people left in this world as normally when I ask questions like this people fall back on pride and ego and start making up stories that can never be verified. The "Blind Leaders" I talked about are much worse as they will not only start making up stories but will refuse to do any test that would allow someone to actually evaluate their work properly, IE, providing any MMW numbers or running timed temperature test showing there the water isn't being heated up while they push amps through the water as the voltages they are at are simply far below the threshold for ionization to take place. They make one claim after another but none can be verified or copied by others. They suffer from a need to be always be better than everyone else even if they are not provably. Most of the time they can not be saved as they have backed themselves into a corner with all of their lies from which they would have to swallow their puffed up pride and ego and that is something they are simply unwilling to do. In my last dealings with a Blind Leader and his followers they learned the power of reflection in that I'd ask them a question and they would in turn reflect that question back on me trying to make it sound as if I was fishing for information. But that type of fighting relies on someone not answering the questions so I simply answered the question they refused to answer. But then I realized that it works both ways as they didn't know the answer to the questions I was asking and figured out a way for me to give them the information that they needed so that they would be able to answer these questions in the future if asked. But I'm a lot smarter than that and only answered questions that can be easily read in the patents if one just takes the time to read through them to find the solutions to the questions I was asking. I didn't answer any questions that require one to learn from actually performing the experiments.
There is one thing that I do know that in time will hold to be true and that is the road I am on right now others will have to travel down these same paths that I have already been on as it's only a matter of time. I can say this as I understand the core science behind this technology and there are only a few ways to go about breaking the bonds of the water molecules like this. It's not ego or pride talking it's just what I have learned from trial and error with actual hands on experimentation making use of the scientific method as a tool to help guide my efforts.
Well, time to get back to work.
Good experimenting everyone take care,
TGS
