Author Topic: New video: Edward Mitchel  (Read 44618 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #64 on: August 14, 2015, 09:42:44 am »
Ed has left the ionizationx forum.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #65 on: August 14, 2015, 13:37:46 pm »
Sorry about him...Its hard to go alone against a river... its said how he want to sailing alone...  i

 i would like to point how the vic must have the coils polarity arrange...

it seems to me that in Ed drawings he is using both chokes in subtracting from the secondary where only the tx5 should be doing that... why?without prof...thats what stan show in the patent of the vic!

i hope we learned something about him too...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #66 on: August 14, 2015, 14:48:54 pm »
If the Vic transformer only provides charging pulses to the electrodes, pulses can be generated electronically.  Doesn't work.  When the choke coils are on the same core as the primary, they are also secondaries.  With the main secondary wired to a choke secondary, the output has two waveforms, so that makes a standing wave.  Couldn't an op amp mixer provide the correct signal to a stand alone choke?

If two frequencies are slightly different, the standing wave will walk.  A wave sweeping across the water is the same as the water sweeping across a stationary wave.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #67 on: August 14, 2015, 16:06:16 pm »
the pulses are actually generated electronically but the vic adjust the electronic pulse to the correct impedance level.. and restrict the amps to allow voltage to take over and does the work. an "electronic" low voltage would never work...

Grounding the cell will never work.. can you see that?

if you have a baseball and a bowling ball which can you launch higher? thats why the cell is preferably small...

I believe the chokes action only happen when in the same core... otherwise the configuration of how it should be connected should be different maybe for it to work... probably coupling with coils.. or actually changing the config.

In my analysis the magnetic field going on on the coils is key..

i started a new thread talking a little about this...
« Last Edit: August 14, 2015, 16:25:03 pm by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #68 on: August 20, 2015, 10:23:58 am »
Hey TGS

how do you get the molecules striped off electrons without consuming the required energy for ionization?

How could you do it  without amps flow or preventing electron flow?

there is a quantum leap between the ionization you describe and covalent switch off stan describes...


i will explain it to you... as for it work the same on particle accelerators

when you get a gas you can ionize it... (my teacher words) You can indeed take all the electrons out of oxygen if you want but it takes energy for it..


in an electrical particle accelerator the end energy of the particle depends not only on the accelerating voltage and mass of the particle but also on the charge...

so what they do is to strip the electrons of the oxygen for example for raising its net charge and end up with a more energetic particle at the end of the accelerating distance..

how they do that? in one embodiment they charge the oxygen negatively adding 2 electrons (fro, a hot filament connected to negative million volts capacitor plate ) and the oxygen is liberated being accelerated from the target point... as it gets accelerated it gains energy... now this oxygen strikes a positive high voltage screen (connected to a positive plate a capacitor) that will take the electrons out of it and make it to be accelerated now in the direction of the target.. as it has now 4 to 6 electron missing the energy it achieve is very high...

what you see is that we gave kinetic  energy and used it to strip the electrons... no overunity...

if you were to do this with high voltage for every electron you ionize you get power consume... if you want 1 mol of oxygen ionized...16grams missing just one electron you need to apply high voltage needed times 26.8 amps!

if you get an over voltage ( a voltage too high for the ionization) you generate more heat like electrolysis over voltage...inefficiency....

so really whats you point?

i believe meyer indeed used ionization.. but for me this was part of the rocket science.. actually its also possible for me that he indeed ionized just few atoms per cycle to achieve thermal explosive energy ( atomic reaction ) from just them.. not all...


nature is not preventing the water molecule from forming...

nor nature is in anyway trying to switch off the covalent bound... we are seeking to do un-natural things... no nature can explain it...

nature only explain the working of particle accelerator since your thunderstorm example is similar.. it explain even ozone and acid rain..

but i'm sorry to disappoint you, with all you posted all it seems is that you again try show everyone how "special" you are and how "stupid" other stanleymeyer readers are... 

If your summarization try to close a point that you unfortunately did not prof, until you don't see its not even valid for you, you won't do anything new...

i hope all that i said help you somehow...

good luck
« Last Edit: August 20, 2015, 11:31:01 am by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #69 on: August 20, 2015, 11:24:41 am »
1 watt * 1 second is 1 joule... 1W/s=1J

1 watt * one hour is 3,6kj =1W/h=3600J

497kj /mol mean you need:

138 W/h per mol...

given 26,8 amps is a mol of electrons

you have to give each electron 5,15v of potential... if we summing all this at once gives 500kv

you end up with 1 mol of oxygen diatomic molecules missing one electron

or half mol of atomic oxygen plus half mol of missing 1 electron oxygen atoms...

assuming it is correct

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #70 on: August 20, 2015, 13:59:21 pm »
i wish you good luck... but the wire insulation i'm using is my way of doing and you don't know anything about it no i don't need to lie shalom...

the wire insulation you are taking as 2,2kv i take as maximum 400volts thats where your problem really is.. when you go up for high voltage you need to stay far away from the limits.. if high frequency even worst...

i use oil... although the last picture setup in air got over 25kv without burn... under oil its design to go up 80kv at whatever frequency,,

the secret is to use layers... every layer give you insulation... and make your coils bigger...

i hope you make it work...

i'm sorry if just trying to copying stan work you could not achieve the high voltages you wanted... why don't you start with 1 turn at the primary ... .
« Last Edit: August 20, 2015, 15:47:50 pm by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #71 on: August 24, 2015, 19:49:49 pm »
i thank you for your good will i would love to be helped now!

 i tried to make a fundraising campaign on facebook... not even no dollar achieved... i would really promisse that anyone who wants to help in donating i will only use of course the money for that finality...

here it is the links...

i created a link that anyone could donate a fixed money monthly to help ...

https://www.mercadopago.com/mlb/debits/new?preapproval_plan_id=ce587e578d96409194fb6767032f4500
« Last Edit: August 24, 2015, 20:15:01 pm by sebosfato »