Author Topic: New video: Edward Mitchel  (Read 44671 times)

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #88 on: August 26, 2015, 01:15:47 am »
thank you all for everything i need, for what is necessary steve is coorect lets put our focus on work...

i´m willing to construct one, i tried to make a voltage divider once but it were a mess and the waveform wasnt very good.. today i know little more about constructing maybe i could have luck... i would waste 3 hours maybe..


and edd yes i seem to really have only one good friend unfortunately far away in italy it was the only one who gave a like at the facebook link this in 900 friends.. blame the economy the television but they dont know what they are doing...poor them...  i perceived this already in 2008/9 when i could get no fund for the project and started looking at everybody as a selfish piece of shitt, for me the rich people just stinked... up to i started to just dont care about them, if they were to be my inspiration today we would be damned. fortunately i got around and made it all by myself,.. i even made many rich friends in the way and saw how poor their lifes and objectives can be and sometimes how cool some others  can be without even trying... as i told you i had much luky realy much more than many... but not that luck to also have infinite money or energy or time or space simultaneously. thats why i accept whatever help... for me is really a bad feeling everytime i burn something... haha

just listening to bobs songs to get away of that feeling..




Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #89 on: August 26, 2015, 08:08:06 am »
Ed, stop writing names on purpose with 3 k,s.
Please?

I would even buy the whole probe for my friend, btw.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #90 on: August 26, 2015, 10:50:51 am »
You read that Sebosfato? It looks like you will be getting that differential probe now  8) so do the math on just how much you need as we will make it happen for you  :D

This is how the technology will start one man at a time who's heart is in the right place.

Shalom,
TGS

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #91 on: August 26, 2015, 11:12:33 am »
Steve for me reference in HHO comunity he every day donates to all of us without we even remember of it, and he dont restric himself to this... the work he does maintaining this space is just amazing...he helped me more times but he keep it secret!

as i said when i tried fund raising in energetic forum yet some people from this forum ionizatiox donated there, but edd i dont know if you remember but you use to use that h2opower username... sorry if i´m confusing and werent you... but i remember someone telling everyone else to not donate anything to me since i was not going to get anywhere and the resonant tank informations i was releasing were useless and not what meyer did...

i could take you as my enemy also... but man i know it was just some maybe gelosie at that time.. you were just starting at this like me and others, we were very energetic and disproportional... it were 2006, 2007... i dont really care althout at the time i got little mad about it hehe.. dont worry i dont keep any bad feelings!

lets just keep the thing technological  and we will get really far.. there are many important little stuf we need to make... the 5 collum team should at least inpire us to try to unite...

our common enemy is knowledge price, the covalent bound ... the enemy of my enemy should be my friend so we can help each other haha like war 8) most of times our worst enemy can be ourselves or our best friend...

a friend is someone who wants you too improove, not that one that just tell you good luck... i agree in part

Ed i thank you to push this movement to we help each other..

Brothers i thank you so much its being a year that want to get this... but as it costs 1150$ with the deliver to get it here it was really hard... if somebody of you could buy it and than send it as a gift from your country maybe the costume here let it pass without the importing taxes...but i guess your country may also have some sort of importing taxes... just trying to get around from 400 dollars...


i created today a 10kv i guess 8 amp diode that never get burn as long as the current in the circuit is limited.. .

25 tvs diodes in series...

it costed 10 dollars, but i used some used tvs i had tried before so the reverse leakage can be little higher than should if all were new,,, each suports 400v reverse leakage 1amp

is couterpart to you helping me i will release an updated schematic of my pll working circuit... and will opensource the data i generated about my research on barium titanate and how to make it... though this research stoped before testing fase but i got the material technology to make it and could release to those helping willing to know it... this infomation is priceless... is knowledge developed at the university with also many help´..

« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 12:32:21 pm by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #92 on: September 05, 2015, 22:02:33 pm »
Now this message goes out to all of the members on this forum. The time for asking me questions is coming to a close as I must get back to work soon. So, please watch the video and if you have any questions feel free to ask as now is the time to do so.

(http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y320/h2opower/Picture151_zpsf2464dd9.jpg)

Shalom everyone,
TGS

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #93 on: September 07, 2015, 03:33:45 am »
How did Meyer's Injector achieve focus fusion without Mega Amps in the spark, to produce a magnetic Z-pinch?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #94 on: September 07, 2015, 19:15:52 pm »
How did Meyer's Injector achieve focus fusion without Mega Amps in the spark, to produce a magnetic Z-pinch?

I did make a response but felt it was too much information sharing so I  removed it. This question of yours has nothing to do with the information being shared in the interview video and ignores the fact that this technology works by way of IONIZATION which has already been proven to be true. As was said awhile back you don't get to ask questions as you are not a friend to the technology but one that is unknowingly or knowingly working for those that sell energy or working directly on their behalf out of ignorance. This time I guess the phase "it sucks to be you" applies as it's going to be used on you by me rather you like it or not. You don't get to ask me any questions as you burnt that bridge already.

It is pointless talking you to as you don't have an exciter array from which to work it nor do you have an injector from which to work with. You don't have an differential probe nor many other needed items to be able to observe this technology correctly. You don't even have a voltage intensifier circuit from which to work on as it seems your trying to solve Meyer's work with out duplicate a single thing Meyer used. No 8xa circuit, no anything dealing with Meyer's technology as given to us in the patents or from Don Gable's information sharing with all of us.

When I say the people of this forum it doesn't mean you do you understand? Again you burnt that bridge already.

TGS

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #95 on: November 24, 2015, 01:21:26 am »
In this forum it is clear that what I have to say, even though it is experiment based, is unwanted here. The last time I was posting I was attacked just for being black and not only did the person(s) who did it not get punished by I was banned for being attacked. If that seems backwards it's because it is. The reason for these attacks is quite clear, in the experiments I have shown no one is able to duplicate the results I am getting so it would seem that jealousy made it's way into the hearts of the masses here. Putting that aside for the moment what I have shown everyone is my actual experimental data and pictures to go along with it. Yes, I have reached 9.3-4kv being applied to the plates of the exciter array but this falls short of the needed 10-20kv as stated by Meyer in his patents for the working voltages of the exciter array. I ran into problems that all of you are going to run into once you reach these voltage levels. Unfortunately this is where most of you will be left behind as the solution to the problem is a costly one and most if not all of you simply can't afford the solution.

So, where does this leave us? Well, to be honest it leaves all of you never to be able to follow what I have shown as it's simply outside of your abilities to afford now meaning your out of the game. With this technology the scientific method is a must as there are simply too many unknowns that must be figured out as trying to sit down reasoning this out simply isn't going to work as you need hands on experiments performed so you can carefully observe and learn from the results. Making use of the scientific method will force you to ask the right questions just as long as you are honest with yourself and pay attention to eye witness accounts of Meyer's technology in action as what they saw you will need to be seeing with your experiments. If the water is getting warm stop and figure out what you are doing wrong. If you are not getting high voltages again stop and figure out what you are doing wrong. Note, not until you figure out how to get the voltages up and above 10kv can or should you be looking for jaw dropping gas production.  When you start getting gas production you must take MMW numbers to make sure it is not Dr. Faraday style electrolysis. Taking careful temperature readings will confirm that as well for normal electrolysis will heat up the water at a predictable rate as well as produce gases at a predictable rate.

Now I take you to a bible scripture that I find relevant to this technology as it goes to those that put their pride and ego above the needs of the many. And for those of you that don't like the bible in this technology take it up with Stanley A. Meyer as he quoted Job 38:22-23 to explain this this technology and it's place in our future. Mathew 15:14 "Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch" Beware of these Blind Leaders that put pride and ego above all else making themselves look better than they actually are by putting forth lies in the place of real provable work. Some of them are paid to be here to make sure this technology never see's the light of day others are just puffed up full of pride and ego to the point nothing else matters to them other than their need to appear better than everyone else. The one thing you will notice with these people is the lack of any experimental data to back up what they are saying or showing. They will make claims that they are getting much higher voltages to their cells than Meyer gives us are to be the working voltages for the exciter arrays but not have jaw dropping gas production to go along with it. They will show their setups producing gases but refuse to give anyone any MMW numbers so that their work can be properly evaluated. And most of the time they will refuse to do any timed temperature test to prove that they are getting the same effects as told to us by the eye witness accounts of Stanley Meyer's work in action given to us in the Arthur C. Clarke video stating that it will run for a half hour and the temperature never goes up.

You all have to start holding people accountable for their actions and don't be afraid to ask the hard questions, like what type of test equipment are you using as if they don't have a differential probe they simply can't view this technology correctly. If they don't have a set up that is even remotely like that of Stanley A Meyer's then how can they expect to get the same results? Don Gable gave us all we needed to know in order to build the exciter array's correctly along with many other items. Sure they cost a lot to build but it comes with the territory if one wishes to pursue this field of study. You should be able to follow someone else's work providing that you also have the proper test equipment and similar cells from which to work and compare notes with. For those of you that get left behind don't take it personal and start adding in what you think will happen from your mind as this technology is very resistant to intuition and thus requires hands on experiments and at any point you find yourselves unable to perform the experiments simply choose to sit this one out as you will be doing everyone a favor by doing so.

In the video what people failed to ask me was is the unit getting hot? Well, the answer to that question is no. I ran the unit all day long and it's temperature never changed so I must be doing something right, agreed? In the video I showed a little above 4kv being applied to the exciter array but that falls short of what Meyer tells us are the working voltages for the exciter array being 10-20kv, correct? Thus you saw no jaw dropping gas production as I didn't reach the threshold for ionization with just 4kv being applied to the plates of the exciter array. I have improved much since then but as a result have run into problems that needed costly solutions to be able to correct those problems.

So, now where does this leave us and where to I stand? I can't answer for all of you but I will keep working on this technology at a pace I can handle. As for showing and sharing my work that remains to be seen as from my being kicked out for standing up for myself against racial attacks while the guilty go unpunished it leaves me terribly vexed.

Until the next time.
Take care,
TGS