Author Topic: New video: Edward Mitchel  (Read 44674 times)

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #56 on: August 12, 2015, 14:53:19 pm »
right very cool... do you want to see standing waves ed? a coil oscillating because of its self resonance is an example of standing waves..

Now i ask standing waves are unipolar?

why don't we stop losing time and go make it work... what are you missing? Another 11vic transformer to wire in series?

mas is very very impossible to believe that you propose this... I agree you could split the function of the vic among coils.. but i think you exaggerated..

i get my 50kv and more with much less...

You explanation about the diode and how you look at the vic for me is incorrect... for me is not satisfactory..

maybe if you turn the disc you could see it differently...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #57 on: August 12, 2015, 18:04:38 pm »
Hey Ed, go ahead and post up a video of this system in action. We all want to see the results you are chanting about for 2 or 3 years now.. 1mL of gas every 2 days doesn't count.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #58 on: August 12, 2015, 19:21:43 pm »
Yes, Where is your polarization process... i see any...

the electrical polarization process is enough to trigger hydrogen production on demand when reach resonant action...

that mean when you can proceed with the process over and over again in a constant manner.. to control the needs... 

where is mine?

in between the lines...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #59 on: August 12, 2015, 20:26:14 pm »
Ed Mitchel said that Meyer discussed standing waves.  That's all the proof I need to believe that standing waves play a role in his system.

Standing waves are bi phasic.  Two waves traveling in opposite directions interfere to produce a sum which is a stationary waveform.  John Kanzius sends rf through salt water, then reflects the waves back through the water again, producing a standing wave.  His frequency (13.56 MHz) doesn't completely split the water, so the gas only burns, rather than explode.

With my Meyer's injector build, the rf travels through the injector then produces the plasmoid ignition spark.  The energy in that spark back couples through the injector, producing a standing wave.  This will split the water fast enough that the ignition spark is still there when the fuel gas hits it.

I'm going to spend less time typing and more time building.  I'm standing when I build. 

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #60 on: August 13, 2015, 08:57:00 am »
I had a flame over water similar but not same as kanzius in 2007 2008... the yellow part seems to be sodium burning.. also for the smell... with a prototype i made... you can see how the prototype was like in the youtube channel... but not the test... it were a 10cm yellow open flame with bad smell... it was a tube filled with water and sodium hydroxide.. with few drops of alcohol... although the same amount of alcohol would not sustain a flame for more than 30s... the thing could run for 15min 30min there was up to 20 amps flowing... 12v car battery...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #61 on: August 13, 2015, 21:01:45 pm »
I don't see any valid questions concerning the video or the technology so I guess my work here is done for the moment.
Nor do I see any answers to questions posed.
I'll check in from time to time but know this. Know already all what you need to know if you can understand the science I posted.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #62 on: August 13, 2015, 22:22:20 pm »
I did answer your questions, but you ignored what I said.

It's hard to see a hero turn into an ogre.  Many times, I would have shut down my Ed Gray thread, but you kept me going, also wearing a bull eye on your back.  Or so I thought.  Now I see you differently.  : (

Your work here is done?  What work is that?  Harassing one specific person, after following him here from the other forum?

That's all folks.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2015, 23:18:34 pm by electrotek »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: New video: Edward Mitchel
« Reply #63 on: August 13, 2015, 22:50:23 pm »
I did answer your questions, but you ignored what I said.

It's hard to see a hero turn into an ogre.  Many times, I would have shut down my Ed Gray thread, but you kept me going, also wearing a bull eye on your back.  Or so I thought.  Now I see you differently.  : (

That's all folks.

You don't understand the science so talking with you is like talking with someone with diminished capacity.