New video: Edward Mitchel

[Login to see usernames]

Hi

Again the question. How did Meyer use HV to break the molecules of water?
Maybe we also need P680?
Shine some lasers in the waterbath?

[Login to see usernames]

well you have right to believe what you want i'm happy with you being someone with good intentions, you are welcome to the forum.. and to believe whatever you can...

in the last link he is comparing meyer to a photosynthesis, that is interesting...but you tell me... if this is not a guess work what i'm Einstein? no... eintein also was guess worker.. just a joke

Nobody who creates ignore lists will ever lead you in the right direction, even less if they had a direction, not even God support this haha. 

i would also be really happy to  see even Lex Luther driving the water car =)

i don't care about things of the past i do think people can be better... even mr h20p

Of course if we send light our reaction will get favored but is not the light that breaks the bound, this is totally out of question.. according to my theory.. hopefully in the end who puts it to work will prove to be correct.. .

photositesis is a catalyzed reaction not our case... although a catalyzer could indeed be helpful or not..

 

[Login to see usernames]

yes meyer uses voltage... you are on a nice way

always good to ask the right question

if you ionize water big current flow... thats electrolysis does too..

meyer didn't broken the water he turn the covalent bound force off

i'm looking at it at totally scientific way.. how he did it!

i went to study the university of physics just to try seeing if i could understand him... but i also started on wiki and mit opencourseware..

i hope we can contribute somehow to this desperate planet..

remember plants are plants.. . we also need to drink water for our cells to keep going..

but meyer talk about voltage

lets put in this way, in my point of view, is totally different from ionization, the covalent switch off... thats in my scientific view of it... it could also be distorted. 

i don't think the your post resume any science... its just lot of ideas... very short thinking

i thought of that too i get platinum and palladium here to sell  if you want.. i don't want to use..

[Login to see usernames]

I agree no one should be ignored.  Anyone might have some little thing which is important.  It is the off topic which should be ignored.  More so if off topic is to distract or misdirect or clutter.  Off topic is ignore in reverse.  Some say too much "ignore yours, here is mine".  Even copy long messages from their own thread, instead of giving a simple link, with only a short discussion.  Which may still be off topic to the other's thread.  This should be ignored. 

[Login to see usernames]

I agree no one should be ignored.  Anyone might have some little thing which is important.  It is the off topic which should be ignored.  More so if off topic is to distract or misdirect or clutter.  Off topic is ignore in reverse.  Some say too much "ignore yours, here is mine".  Even copy long messages from their own thread, instead of giving a simple link, with only a short discussion.  Which may still be off topic to the other's thread.  This should be ignored.

I don't understand this post. Do you or do you not want this technology and just who is being ignored?

[Login to see usernames]

I agree no one should be ignored.  Anyone might have some little thing which is important.  It is the off topic which should be ignored.  More so if off topic is to distract or misdirect or clutter.  Off topic is ignore in reverse.  Some say too much "ignore yours, here is mine".  Even copy long messages from their own thread, instead of giving a simple link, with only a short discussion.  Which may still be off topic to the other's thread.  This should be ignored.

I don't understand this post. Do you or do you not want this technology and just who is being ignored?

I believe you have it... so what is preventing you to show your tremendous ionization device to the world?

i think i know... just ideas won't light a lamp...

if you tried what you are writing or even got a look into books on how this can be done you will see that what meyer accomplish i against the laws of nature... is not something nature is allowed to do otherwise by today there would be no water buddy... but we are..

i'm not saying its not possible to ionize and all i'm just saying that your talking thru your hat without nothing to show... and still want to have done the last correct regard... and its being like like this since 10 years so far i remember...

dont worry.. i also have my own ignorance to deal with..

i don't want to ignore anyone... i believe the more people i have with me the better will be... of course if someone does not have the correct polarity will be naturally repelled.. in this forum respect is the only bottom line, you can have your space, post your posts... discuss your theory... we will be here to take a look and give you a feedback... but remember when we put our theory in game we need to be able to play the game and recognize where we did wrong otherwise we can't develop nothing good for us we just keep the opinion part which is irrelevant. For me opinion is not science... when i give you mine is not science..

i didn't put my theory on open yet totally because i'm still not willing to share it... it took a long almost 10 years for me to put it here and whatever big company just take it away....

so don't hope to find me posting that in that way... i will only be here as a researcher instigating questioning...

I'm not here trying to take you out of your way, i think your way could bring us something new.. so i don't want anybody copying i want alternatives.. thinkers... scientists to work with...

i developed my science all because of this project, and i guess is the case for most.. so is no good if i tell you do this and that// i better that you learn as much as i did... i never want to give out anything digested ask around. 

[Login to see usernames]

I agree no one should be ignored.  Anyone might have some little thing which is important.  It is the off topic which should be ignored.  More so if off topic is to distract or misdirect or clutter.  Off topic is ignore in reverse.  Some say too much "ignore yours, here is mine".  Even copy long messages from their own thread, instead of giving a simple link, with only a short discussion.  Which may still be off topic to the other's thread.  This should be ignored.

I don't understand this post. Do you or do you not want this technology and just who is being ignored?

You're ignoring what I said at our other forum, about why I DO want the technology. (ie, Something which WORKS - not just someone's "original ideas", as you call it.  And you're also ignoring what you just quoted me as saying: "No one" (meaning YOU) "should be ignored".  That's all I'm going to say about this; I have IMPORTANT things I'm spending my time on.

[Login to see usernames]

wish you good luck.. for the record i got up to 50kv on the exciters and more than 3kv across each cell.. by the way reaching high voltages is not a problem..