Gated Pulse Frequency Generator Schematic

[Login to see usernames]

Yea thats the type Variable Frequency Generator that Im using. I have the complete circuit about 95% completed, I just need to make some connections between the boards and add a couple of capacitors and it will be finished and ready for testing. So far I've been able to test out the  Variable Frequency Generator, Gated Pulse Generator, Pulse Indicator, Driver Circuit and Resonant Scanning Circuit. They are all operating as Stan says they should. The biggest part will of course be the PLL circuit. Keep ya fingers crossed. I will report my results ASAP!!!

[Login to see usernames]

Ali, the frequency generator circuit (fig 12) is the same as the 8XA thats already posted somewhere on this site.The chips are 7490 and not 4017.
Don

@Don: ...Didnt you say somewhere that the 4017 would make a 50% duty cycle out of a trigger signal?

the output of the 555 is more of a spike on fig 12 than a 50%duty cycle...I know that once the divide by 10 chip gets that spike it converts it to a 50% duty cycle but can this be done elsewhere with a 4017?

I tried combining the outputs of a 4017 all even numbered and made a frequency divider but had to use 1n4148 diodes or it wouldnt simulate...and there is quite a voltage drop with those...

@Tony: can you please explain if your gated fig 6 with the 74122 used NOR chips or XNOR, etc...?

thanks guys

P.S. does anyone have a clue where the EEC circuit was located on the buggy to extract the electrons from the ambient air in the gas processor? or a good parts list for the EEC circuit?

[Login to see usernames]

@Ali ...The 4017's are basically the same as the 7490's, its just the 7490's are TTL chips that operate on 5v and the 4017's are CMOS which can operate with voltages higher than 5v like say 10v, 12v, 15v...etc. Both are positive edge triggers. This means that the rising edge of any pulse is how it get its signal and it doesn't do anything with the negative edge or falling edge. Hope this answered your question.

I'm using 7402 NOR just like posted in the image that I posted with the values that Don gave out ( http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php?topic=1965.msg19731#msg19731 ) I have actually built this circuit and it does work as Don said earlier.

[Login to see usernames]

wow i didnt like connection K yesterday  but today is my friend lol. i found that if signal K matches the superimposed frequency it does wat ive been trying to do manually for two days on its own I did have to add a FWB to the imposed signal .Ive got the rectified  am signal at 120hz and connection K at 120 hz , the resonate frequency generator(am) set at 5khz.

[Login to see usernames]

wow i didnt like connection K yesterday  but today is my friend lol. i found that if signal K matches the superimposed frequency it does wat ive been trying to do manually for two days on its own

All connection "K" does is if the pressure sensor senses too high of a pressure it will send a high signal to the transistor which will cause the the transistor to be active and then the output to the AND gate will be 0v and this will stop the signal from going to the PLL circuit. Its just a safty feature.

[Login to see usernames]

wow i didnt like connection K yesterday  but today is my friend lol. i found that if signal K matches the superimposed frequency it does wat ive been trying to do manually for two days on its own

All connection "K" does is if the pressure sensor senses too high of a pressure it will send a high signal to the transistor which will cause the the transistor to be active and then the output to the AND gate will be 0v and this will stop the signal from going to the PLL circuit. Its just a safty feature.

   
 
Thats cool i can see if the frequency on connection K is higher then it cuts some pulses off  for instance in the sim it and the imposed signal is running at 120hz  and the output is one for one but if K is raised to 240 hz it cuts the pulses in half and so on. I s that how you see the sensor working or a voltage controlled sensor or something else?

The signal to "K" isn't going to be a pulse signal, its a variable voltage signal from the GMS.

[Login to see usernames]

wow i didnt like connection K yesterday  but today is my friend lol. i found that if signal K matches the superimposed frequency it does wat ive been trying to do manually for two days on its own

All connection "K" does is if the pressure sensor senses too high of a pressure it will send a high signal to the transistor which will cause the the transistor to be active and then the output to the AND gate will be 0v and this will stop the signal from going to the PLL circuit. Its just a safty feature.

   
 
Thats cool i can see if the frequency on connection K is higher then it cuts some pulses off  for instance in the sim it and the imposed signal is running at 120hz  and the output is one for one but if K is raised to 240 hz it cuts the pulses in half and so on. I s that how you see the sensor working or a voltage controlled sensor or something else?

The signal to "K" isn't going to be a pulse signal, its a variable voltage signal from the GMS.

ohhh...  thank ya Mr. Tony
 sorry bout tha silly posts....   keep up the good work man   

[Login to see usernames]

@Ali ...The 4017's are basically the same as the 7490's, its just the 7490's are TTL chips that operate on 5v and the 4017's are CMOS which can operate with voltages higher than 5v like say 10v, 12v, 15v...etc. Both are positive edge triggers. This means that the rising edge of any pulse is how it get its signal and it doesn't do anything with the negative edge or falling edge. Hope this answered your question.

I'm using 7402 NOR just like posted in the image that I posted with the values that Don gave out ( http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php?topic=1965.msg19731#msg19731 ) I have actually built this circuit and it does work as Don said earlier.

@ Tony... have you tried the figure 6 gate circuit with a variable pulse width input ( from the accelerator figure2)

If so, what does the waveform look like?

 does it appear to be able to vary the duty cycle of the gated signals as well? ( as it should, to increase or decrease gas output)

@ All
Is the Control Circuits group figures 2 thru 12 supposed to also work on Stan's later development where the buggy ran on Injectors and a Gas Processor only ( NO resonant cavity) and the new slotted stacked bobbin 6-1 VIC for each injector?

wondering if this circuitry was only designed for the U-I core VIC we have been watching Tony Build???


++++++++++++++++++++++++      Thanks to all     +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You should all be proud of yourselves for using this forum to restore the good name of a Brilliant Christian Scientist who's name was dragged through the mud... To all those who think Stan Meyer was a fraud...THESE CIRCUITS ARE REAL, THEY WORK....ENOUGH SAID!

KEEP THE FAITH EVERYONE, DONT GIVE UP TILL WERE ALL RUNNING DOWN THE ROAD ON FREE ENERGY!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Energy Independance is a basic human right provided by the Creator

Proof? does it take any money to let a horse graze freely in a field?
can you ride a horse for free?

Can you walk for free

then why should greedy men control our energy future, its abundant and all around us... we can even de-salinate ocean water and provide for less fortunate

Stan said the primary goal of this technology was to promote the Gospel of Christ to the world
Power to the believers!

good job everyone!

Thanks to Donaldwfc, Dynodon, Tony and all the others who continue on this thread
take good notes, make DVDS and give them to your family and friends and have them do the same, before the MAN comes down hard on this forum!