Who is right discusion

[Login to see usernames]

Ok....now that  was funny Good luck you inventor you
Oh and congratulations in cleaning up your waveform...may it bring you peace and love and a life filled with happiness with all the work youve done to create such a thing it must have took you years to figure that out...Bravo

[Login to see usernames]

Jealous people is really what this is all about isn't it?  Those who are jealous of your success, who wish to be in your place and who wish that you lose the things that you have in order to be better than you is what I hear coming from all of these negative comments from you people. I showed a waveform getting 8.8kv to measurement points D&E and this success has turned out to too good for people to accept and caused them to become jealous of me.

A jealous person won’t come and tell you that he\she is jealous of you nor will they say it directly to one of their friends but instead their jealousy will appear in the form of hatred, resentment and gossiping.

Not to hurt their Egos jealous people will never say it directly but the envy they have towards you will spill out of their mouths in the form of non constructive criticism, rude treatment or disrespect for you. These actions I see in practically all of you.

I am not about to apologize for my successes as I know I put in the work in order to be successful with this technology. A long time ago I use to believe in open source and would share what I learned very openly. But after many would claim they came up with the ideas I would share less and less. Now I have totally given up on open source as all I see is competition which leads to jealousy which leads to resentment when some shows results that they themselves can't do. These people will then resort to lying to make themselves look better than those who's work they have become jealous of. In the spirit of competition they want to be first and if they have too lie, cheat, and steal to get there that's fine by them as it's only a means to an end that puts them on top.

I left open source as it's underlining mission clashes with my company's goals. As they consistently show a non-caring attitude towards their fellow man. Never do they see the big picture nor do they realize who's side they are on as they typically can't see past their own noses and/or self interest. They will reflect what they are onto others as it is a form of mental illness they have.

Now I have ask Steve to delete this thread as it only goes to show just how much open source has truly failed as it's mission has been hijacked thus it is a complete and otter failure towards it's original goals.

[Login to see usernames]

Why delete this.... A little exposing isnt it Just remember one thing....

Some Gave All.

[Login to see usernames]

Maybe because your aproach has been not the best.

Just go away if you feel not welcome.

Easy as that.

(Im still waiting to see where Stan used a bath of oil in transformers, maybe the scientific method, lol).

You dont know even what happens with some capacitors in series, you are so stupid and ignorant that make discuss to you so sad.
Did you calculate the capacitance of your cells in series? how? what is your resonant frequencY ? Your capacitance? coils inductance and reactance at "resonnat action" (not resonance).

[Login to see usernames]

I do think that basic principles are being ignored.

1. To vibrate or stretch the molecules apart, the Mid-infrared spectrum is needed. That is the only thing that will get into the molecules. To accomplish this there are two ways. Infra-red emitting ceramic or a Yag laser. The laser, is ruled out because the power source is not part of the breakdown process. Which I will get into in a moment.

2. This leads us to another aspect. Heat - In playing around with infrared, you would soon realize that creating the infra red involves generating heat!.

We know that Electrolysis breaks the water apart. We know that heat is generated, we know that a double electric layer is formed on the plates, we know that once that layer is formed, more current is needed to break thru the layer to produce more gas, which produces more heat.

What to DO?.  All of our efficiency is being lost as HEAT.

1. If I could recycle the heat back into the process, I could gain MORE efficiency.
2. If I could eliminate the Double Electric layer, I could increase efficiency.
3. If I could current limit the electronics, I could increase efficiency.

Double Electric Layer - A Resonant Cavity with water being pumped thru it, with gasses being produced, will create resonance at a certain pressure. This is not even debatable. It at least doubles production with straight DC, and also makes nano bubbles. So, with this in place, efficiency has been increased, because the double electric layer is being destroyed by the moving molecules, which also creates
particle impact.

Heat - Designing a cell with the use of an infrared emitting ceramic, in the 2-3um range will take the heat and convert it into IR. That IR will weaken the bonds even more, thus raising the efficiency. This is the only path "INTO" the molecules. Also, this part of the device should be heat sinked to the atmosphere!.  Any "overunity" device would incorporate this technology.

Combined together with a resonant cavity (vibration) and a gated pulsing circuit. 100% efficiency should be realized.  Resonance is in the breaking apart of the molecules (electronic), with the action of the water. (physical)

Forget Stan Meyer when it comes down to magically breaking water down with just voltage. The VIC is not designed to stop current leakage thru it. It is a thermostat, He even states that in his patent. Does the thermostat on the wall of your home generate the heat in your home. I think not!.

This is all about recycling energy. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying.

[Login to see usernames]

Its so funny how many people try to ignore simple rules of just being polite.
Many ego's working hours on the same kind technology.
Please people, keep some respect for eachother.
If somebody posts something that you dont like, then dont react.
Just open your own topic. Its that simple.
You can have even your own project section. Just ask. You get moderator rights in there. You can modify delete etc etc everything in your own project section.....

All i do, is clean post content or remove posts when the content is not technology related or if the emotions pushes people into mudslinging.

cheers

and dont start writing about me being suppressive and freedom of speech....talk techno or go elsewhere.

[Login to see usernames]

It seems Ronnie and I have a difference of opinion in that I am shooting for the benchmark voltage Meyer set for us being 1kv per resonant cavity and he I have no idea. Since the both of us don't share all that much we have no idea what each other is actually doing so for him to make a rant on the RWG about me just throwing volts at the water fuel capacitor he fails to understand that until we reach the benchmark voltage we can't see what Meyer was talking about. I am okay leaving him to his thoughts and wish he would would extend the same curtsy to me.

Since I understand the science behind the technology I understand that we are ionizing the atoms that make up the water molecules in order to get the molecules to simply fall apart once the atoms start to give up their electrons. The rules for ionization don't change when it comes to using electricity to ionize atoms, IE, high voltage potential difference and low amps. What changed in what Meyer was doing was the medium as water has far less resistance than air has. One day people will understand this easy to understand science but for now I guess they need to go back to school as they seem to have gaps in their learning. My whole focus was getting at the science behind the technology so I could see the whole picture as that is how I work best at problem solving so I play to my strengths. Once I understood the science behind the technology I was able to troubleshoot it far more effectively than before I understood the science behind the technology.

For me I have always been good at problem solving and troubleshooting. I recognize that I don't think like everyone else as I would solve problems far faster than most. I remember arriving at my new station while I was in the military and people playing jokes on me in that they gave the new SGT a couple of bays with trucks in them that had not worked in over nine months stuck in those bays. These trucks had problems they couldn't figure out and they had given up on them. It took me just two weeks to get those trucks out of my bays fixing what they said couldn't be fixed. Like what's happening to me with these forums they weren't happy that I fixed those trucks and got jealous of my abilities when it came to problem solving and troubleshooting. They would even tell me to slow my roll as I was making them all look bad again the same situation I face here in showing results no one else is even coming close to showing at this moment in time. But like I said this is not new ground to me as I have been here before in dealing with a lot of jealous people.

When I had gotten those vehicles out of my bays those same people who couldn't figure out what was wrong with those trucks in close to a years time had the nerve to tell me, "What took you so long." Mind you that it took me two weeks to get those trucks out of my bay which means I solved what they couldn't solve, ordered the parts, and installed them in two weeks time so it actually took me less than a week to figure out what was wrong with them. With Meyer's technology what has taken me so long is it has a lot of stumbling blocks one must over come along with figuring out the science behind the technology. The science part didn't take me all that long in that it took me around six years to understand it but the stumbling blocks did take a bit of time to discover as they go towards the core of the technology leading people the wrong way on purpose or out of ignorance of those that placed these stumbling blocks in our way.

This is to Ronnie, lets just agree to disagree, okay? You have what you think is a solution and I have what I think is a solution that is based on sound scientific principles by making use of the scientific and engineering methods. Best of luck to us both.

TGS

(http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y320/h2opower/Picture143_zps2e3881b7.jpg)

[Login to see usernames]

What TGS showed was only high voltage, large watts and tiny bubbles.

Anyone saw the crux WFC or qiman13 (Aaron Murakami) WFC?