Author Topic: Salt Water  (Read 3795 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Salt Water
« on: August 02, 2015, 19:44:33 pm »
In the New Zealand video, Stan mentions that when he met with high ranking Officers from the Air Force he advised them of the possibility that a fighter jet could fly down just above the ocean's surface and scoop up salt water, thereby giving the jet an "unlimited range".

Has anyone given any thought as to how he could use salt water in his system?  People in the government and military apparently thought he was on to something, or he wouldn't have been given so many meetings.  It seems to me that everyone is focusing on the basic electrolysis part of Meyer's system, without considering his more advanced techniques.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2015, 00:42:12 am »
electrotek, voltage if used as meyer said should break the molecules because its really strong field... the salt only problem is that it will keep increasing the concentration as water rapidly is consumed changing the parameters.

Meyer complete solution to this was the injectors.. a kind of powerful fuel cell that water only gets in and completely flush out every injection cycle...

from my understanding salt or other electrolyte is maybe a kind of good for the reaction except for it break the laws of economics creating waste products which are not desirable... as per stan words mentioning horvath in same video...


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2015, 02:21:51 am »
Salt in the water would increase its conductivity quite a bit.  I wonder if this means he was secretly using insulated electrodes, while using non insulated electrodes in his public demonstrations with normal water?  His public cells were much bigger than his injector cell.

He said his system used potential only, and the only current was the normal leakage current associated with any capacitor.  Insulation would not block the potential from his pulses.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2015, 03:36:35 am »
The static electricity balloon which attracts a little stream of water from the faucet doesn't touch the water.  It's insulated by the air.

I'll build a static generator and see if it attracts a salt water stream.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2015, 11:27:00 am »
The static electricity balloon which attracts a little stream of water from the faucet doesn't touch the water.  It's insulated by the air.

I'll build a static generator and see if it attracts a salt water stream.

This is a very very good remark!
Thank you for this.
Statics electricity insulated by air works on water........
Hmmmmmm
How to translate this to the VDG?


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2015, 13:13:43 pm »
the problem with insulation is one... it will limit the current you can  apply to water to get it charged... the advantage is that it accumulate charge and this can than be used to break the molecule if proper circuit is used... ex.. fracture cell... of course the higher the dielectric the higher will be the ability to polarize water but whatever dielectric will do this screening process leaving you with the need to use several thousand volts to get over the insulation screening. a metal won't screen e fields for example...

i constructed 2  fracture cells few years ago.. .but could not get over the high ozone production...

basically when you have insulator and conductor you get an interface problem when you use high voltage...

basically as you reach a voltage where corona happens the insulator will hold this charge and will be little hard to discharge it.. . since the charges flew away from metal...

what can be done is to metallize the insulator on both sides granting the good touching of the electrode and insulator... this way the air inside won't get ionized.. another approach now i know would be to fill with oil..

an insulator allow a high current to flow initially than it will restrict this current... if you revert it it will create a high current peak..

an inductor initially impedes the current to flow fighting against it with a potential to not allow current to flow... when current stops the voltage is reversed...

in a transformer you can get other coupled inductors that will create a potential copying the potential of the first coil but also allowing to connect in reverse.. also it provide insulation..


i was thinking about a brazilian patent that mention meyer...

they seem to use the same idea of the chokes to steal energy from the electric company...

basically a transformer that steps the voltage in a sense that if you connect in series with the plug makes your bill value go backwards..

they say they capture electrons from earth...

i'm almost sure they step up the voltage and use the line to connect the system so the clock run backwards since current is flowing in the other direction...

they say it amplify power...
« Last Edit: August 03, 2015, 13:29:58 pm by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2015, 20:43:17 pm »
this brazilian patent makes a citation about stanley meyer patent about the magnetized particle electrical generaotor...

it just led me to one question...

Any of you have an EPG constructed?

what if you put 100 amps on the copper tube... and kind of use magnets to polarize the electrons... as they move can't they now generate current in a coil perpendicular to it?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Salt Water
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2015, 20:52:03 pm »
about the barbosa patent i think that could be simpler than we imagine... i think the idea used this principle...

here we get  two 110v volts two phases and ground... when the energy comes down the line they are connected to ground too so its part of the circuit.

lets suppose we had a 1:1 transformer connected to its phases ... so i have now 220v insulated from the source...

now just connect this 220v to 1 antiphase and ground what you get is 110v but whatever current you consume will go in opposite direction on the clock meter...

if it were an step up it would also work... because the load current must pass thru source in backwards direction.. or thru the same primary adding to the original field as a positive feedback..

ex/ you have an 220v source and a stepup transformers simply connect the secondary and primary on one side in phase and the load across the other side of secondary and the other primary side...

probably the side effect is that this current must pass thru the network output transformers... (those are step down so should already be rated for high current...

if you would buck the voltage you would be paying for lot more electricity than you used for example...


thinking about the EPG meyer used charged particles set them into movement to get energy..

electrons in this shorted coil seems to me like the same

maybe i'm just confuse.. may that only trick the clock? i don't think its free energy there might be something missing..

sorry about off topic ok
« Last Edit: August 03, 2015, 22:40:25 pm by sebosfato »