Author Topic: Steve I got A ? for the GEET  (Read 12126 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 827
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2012, 15:45:40 pm »
hydrocars has a history of being a careful and knowledgeable experimenter so his views should be given more weight in this matter

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2388
  • Testing
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2012, 20:28:47 pm »
Thanks jim! My first thought is the Air inlet hose was too small because the motor would act like it would start starving after a while. So I replaced the small hose with a bigger hose so that would not be the problem. It did not help the situation.

Stevie, Did you run your engine for over 30 mins'? Mine would run about that length of time,  what I found is the fuel would become Unusable after you extracted the flammable vapor from it. you'de be left with an unusable tented liquid. It promised nothing and proved worse.

Once you replace with new fuel, once that temperature is meet, the idle speed is suffered with the air inlet completely shut off no matter the mix or quality of the fuel.

If you shake the fuel container it seems to idle the engine up a good bit. Shaking disturbs it more than Bubbling up threw it so it is good to keep the fuel on some sorta shaker. Near then end If I stopped shaking the fuel container it would die, give it a shake and it idle back up. I was very displeased with the results. Droping an Rod in the Intake Tube would only speed up the velocity of the fuel entering the intake and reduce the time the fuel was exposed to the reaction chamber, you could control this exposure rate by varying the size of the rod. Some guys just use a Cooling coil, that defeats the purpose of the system as shown. But if it proves true then it is possible the reaction chamber is becomming to hot and the fuel is to hot to burn so its smothering like a flame with a glas jar over it.

even if the correct temp is meet with this system, once the vapors are extracted from the gas whats left does not combust, its a useless liquid you end up with in the end. Someone prove me wrong?
« Last Edit: July 20, 2012, 22:01:41 pm by Hydrocars »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2012, 13:05:12 pm »
Hydrocars,I see you let the Meyer case aside ...i believe you...About the geet,how did you sealed the pipes?If you used plumer tape is not good because it isolates the iner pipe of the outerpipe,the two must be in contact,so try using gasked sealent.If not work,I don;t know what to say,but I'v seen a lot of replications that worked...Good luck with your experiments!!!

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2388
  • Testing
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2012, 19:27:24 pm »
You seen allot that worked for how long? No I didn't set it a side.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2388
  • Testing
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2012, 05:12:36 am »
solid weld adys15

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2012, 10:23:47 am »
I understand hidrocars,I don't know what  to say,i just read the free plans and listen to radio interwievs with Paul,if you live near to Paul go to one of his classes,if you have time and money to spend in that field:d ,About Stan case....you advanced somehow?i see people geting tired and all forums are dead...I also i am tired....the patens are not altered...the gear in reality is just like described in the patents...but still no replication and no crazy gas production to be able to run a car:(
Good luck with your experiments!!

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2388
  • Testing
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #14 on: July 22, 2012, 20:23:22 pm »
I have done whats in the plans of the geet, I am the only one it does not work for, I actually had plans on running mine for long periodes of time. The start out RPM is hardly enough to meet the grid voltage. It quickly drops. On stan, Just because its a patent doesn't mean anything. A man can invent a machine to do great things using Triangle waves at 13.5 Mhz hitting a resonate cavity which produces Microwaves that unlock certain things, like in the vacuum tube cavity. But he has the choice of using Square waves at 1000 Hz and a resonate cavity with produces X microwaves in all his patents. Just because you replicated what he put in the patent, which is incorrect, does not mean your machine can do what his does. All he did was gain a patent on his design.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Steve I got A ? for the GEET
« Reply #15 on: July 22, 2012, 20:56:22 pm »
Yes you are right but what happens with all his tech that is constructed almost identical like in the patents just with minimal changes....