Author Topic: mystifying  (Read 3371 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2388
  • Testing
mystifying
« on: March 08, 2017, 03:47:51 am »
 ::) Still Today nobody has found the answer, Im still here, watching, listening, smiling.. Once I gain, briefly i'll repeat myself, Go disable your pop off valves and shoot from a distance. And, use caution when removing a ratiotor cap.  ???

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: mystifying
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2017, 09:44:06 am »
 ;) nice one

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: mystifying
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2017, 10:32:00 am »
::) Still Today nobody has found the answer, Im still here, watching, listening, smiling.. Once I gain, briefly i'll repeat myself, Go disable your pop off valves and shoot from a distance. And, use caution when removing a ratiotor cap.  ???

He is still alive  :)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2388
  • Testing
Re: mystifying
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2017, 04:31:35 am »
hello old friend.. im 14 court cases in.. Its been a long going process, and very disturbing doing the custody battle. After 18 years with her and having 3 children, 2 living, they ruled we was not married after plenty $$$.

I cant seem to understand why the people here in the research group hasn't discovered the true answer to water for fuel. If a water heater flys upward, is it not a rocket and was it not fuel that thrusted it? Why, why, why is it so hard to understand that if you raise the pressure you raise its boiling point, and if the water is above its ambient boiling point then, is it not common sense that releasing water at this pressure (125) and temperature (superheated) will thrust the piston downward when injected 5 degrees or even retarded, as it hits the aluminium cooler called an engine. 




Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: mystifying
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2017, 08:55:46 am »
hello old friend.. im 14 court cases in.. Its been a long going process, and very disturbing doing the custody battle. After 18 years with her and having 3 children, 2 living, they ruled we was not married after plenty $$$.

I cant seem to understand why the people here in the research group hasn't discovered the true answer to water for fuel. If a water heater flys upward, is it not a rocket and was it not fuel that thrusted it? Why, why, why is it so hard to understand that if you raise the pressure you raise its boiling point, and if the water is above its ambient boiling point then, is it not common sense that releasing water at this pressure (125) and temperature (superheated) will thrust the piston downward when injected 5 degrees or even retarded, as it hits the aluminium cooler called an engine.

I am sorry to hear about all those divorce crap.
Hope you still see yr kids.
About that pressure idea for water, did you had any change to test something on that?

cheers!

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: mystifying
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2017, 09:03:48 am »
Some data on water under pressure.

Data are based on the equation of state recommended by the International Association for the Properties of Steam in 1984, as presented in Haar,
Gallagher, and Kell, NBS-NRC Steam Tables (Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1984). The temperature scale is IPTS-68.
Note that: 1 mbar = 100 Pa = 0.000986923 atmos = 0.750062 mmHg.
P/mbar T/°C P/mbar T/°C P/mbar T/°C P/mbar T/°C
50 32.88 915 97.17 1013.25 100.00 1200 104.81
100 45.82 920 97.32 1015 100.05 1250 105.99
150 53.98 925 97.47 1020 100.19 1300 107.14
200 60.07 930 97.62 1025 100.32 1350 108.25
250 64.98 935 97.76 1030 100.46 1400 109.32
300 69.11 940 97.91 1035 100.60 1450 110.36
350 72.70 945 98.06 1040 100.73 1500 111.38
400 75.88 950 98.21 1045 100.87 1550 112.37
450 78.74 955 98.35 1050 101.00 1600 113.33
500 81.34 960 98.50 1055 101.14 1650 114.26
550 83.73 965 98.64 1060 101.27 1700 115.18
600 85.95 970 98.78 1065 101.40 1750 116.07
650 88.02 975 98.93 1070 101.54 1800 116.94
700 89.96 980 99.07 1075 101.67 1850 117.79
750 91.78 985 99.21 1080 101.80 1900 118.63
800 93.51 990 99.35 1085 101.93 1950 119.44
850 95.15 995 99.49 1090 102.06 2000 120.24
900 96.71 1000 99.63 1095 102.19 2050 121.02
905 96.87 1005 99.77 1100 102.32 2100 121.79
910 97.02 1010 99.91 1150 103.59 2150 122.54

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
  • Build it. Power it. Use it.
Re: mystifying
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2017, 20:52:19 pm »
Well, there's something I hadn't thought of: I can pull super heated water from the RADIATOR. And I can take the back two cylinders on my straight six and use them to pump up enough air pressure to run the other four cylinders. The question is, where does the heat come from to boil the radiator? AND, what do I do with all those pulses from the motor driven alternator?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
  • Build it. Power it. Use it.
Re: mystifying
« Reply #7 on: March 13, 2017, 17:13:45 pm »
I'm the last person who's going to dispute that Free Energy is available from water. I've read reports that a water arc explosion produces 200 times the energy needed for detonation. The primary issues I see is that most of the output energy appears in the form of light and sound, with heat and pressure being less significant. The other thing is that any pressure produced is immediately followed by a collapse in the form of suction. So there's no net pressure blast. However, if a nano fog could result from spraying hot water under pressure, THAT could be ignited by a Ball Lightning type discharge. Especially if hho is added to the mix. So my assessment is that we still need the VIC.