Puharich , Horvath , Anderson

[Login to see usernames]

I have never read of anyone replicating ,  attempting to or even indepth discussion on these inventors , they have been by passed .

alot of focus has been put on Stan Meyer , is his set up seen as simpler ?

are Puharich , Horvath , Anderson seen as simpler , harder or OBSOLETE ?   (and not worth the effort)

water is still the same , the game hasnt changed , the only difference is time wins and the inventor becomes obsolete

SM is equally dead as Puharich and Anderson , their inbox is empty

I have read the patents of Horvath and Puharich , typical of patents being empty of real world information
I have searched different forums  , very bare on the subject

[Login to see usernames]

 I believe the actual pioneer was Dr. Andrija Puharich.  It was Dr. Puharich who was granted U.S. patent # 4,394,230 for a "Method and Apparatus for Splitting Water Molecules."  His patented method of "splitting water" surpassed all previous norms as he was able to accomplish this (splitting water) with a net energy gain.  In the 1970's, it was said that Dr. Puharich had an internal  combustion engine running on his remarkable process long before he was even granted patents in the early 1980's.   

It was said of Dr. Puharich that he was warned by the powerful Rockefeller family (a family deeply entrenched in the oil industry) to end his water as fuel research.   

It is my belief that Stanley Meyer came along and studied Dr. Puharich's technology and not only was able to duplicate it, but he also went on to perfect it beyond that of his protege.  Stan had a certain knack for taking complex machines completely apart and reconstructing them without so much as a handbook.  He also possessed professional skills in electronics as well.

[Login to see usernames]

well we would need to know more about them to know who did it first... i believe horvath came before meyer ...

sadly non of them got it to the public for use

[Login to see usernames]

Yes, they are all worth studying.  I would love to see others replicate many different inventors and innovators in the water for fuel field. 

[Login to see usernames]

The award for who was first I think belongs to Dr. Dingle of the Philippines as he was riding the President of the Philippines around in 1969 which is before most of you where even born. http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=928
I use to talk to him on the phone before he passed away in 2010. My wife had to interpret for me as his dialect was too strong for me to be able to understand him clearly.

As you all can see there is a lot you don't know about me. For me what I saw was missing from all of these inventors was a hard scientific look at just what was taking place in terms of science or that is to say the core science behind all of these inventors work. It took me a while to get at this core science behind the patents and claims and to my credit I did share it with you all and even have a video interview where I talk about parts of the core science that makes all of this possible.

I can't be blamed for how this new science was received as it would seem that it's too late as the Naysayers word is taken over the word of someone that is actually experimenting on this technology in the real world. With the core science I can go into other areas this technology can branch off too. But after what happened to me on this site I don't feel like talking much these days as since this information is new it simply can't be looked up in the books we have on the shelves today and that is a problem for most that I share this information with. In the end I let the Naysayers win as there are in too deep now and it is clear that their word is taken to be as good as gold and mines as worthless trash.

Now I am just focusing my efforts on my work and pretty much choose to stay out of the loop these days. My advice to all of you is to make use of the scientific and engineering methods to aid your efforts at solving this technology:
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_scientific_method.shtml
https://sites.tufts.edu/eeseniordesignhandbook/2013/engineering-method/

I make use of them both and would strongly suggest all of you to do the same as from my experience this technology is the complete opposite of Dr. Faraday's electrolysis method.

Just make sure to get off of the drawing board and preform some real experiments and be prepared to fail as we learn most when we fail and if you are too afraid to fail you will more than likely never learn.

TGS

[Login to see usernames]

There is also this man in brasil who made it in 1967 a car that ran on water... i beilieve him stil but i tried to work with him... he have some patents but is really old.. i invested some time and money but we didnt made anything else than a eolic turbine that i helped him... 

he was a priest and researcher... went to states at the university of newyork and got a lab to work with with any materials he wanted...(he had a contract with the bank of america to build some equipment to transform goldsulfate into gold metal)  in 64 he came back to brazil and in 67 the news showed his water ...than dictatorship has made him afraid and he shut up... there is some evidence of it and old people still remember the priest with the water car..


he used platinum and palladium wire for the electrodes... maybe kilograms of it back than...

[Login to see usernames]

Its my beliefs studying these mens work and replicating to a degree will allow us that are not so focused on exact replication to understand to a degree well enough to build something practical, durable , affordable and usable.All of these and other men with different  views were successful in their own way with the help of others.I see no shame in anyone poor or rich learning from other people to gain each success.
 Its sad that these men have passed to verify a solid exact replication...in my eyes no one will EVER forge an exact replication for that very reason.I wish (almost)everyone success with each step we take and also....Merry Christmas !!!!!

[Login to see usernames]

theres also Roger Billings 1965  = http://rogerbillings-hydrogen.blogspot.co.nz/ 

but SM , Horvath , Puharich  and Anderson have fairly close related technique , at least it appears to be the same ball park .
or even at least HV technology which separates them from the other inventors .

Horvath patent refers to electrolysis yet there is no electrolysis cell in the diagram , theres a transformer ,there isnt even a diode .   
Puharich patent drawing has isolation transformer with no diode either , the sec circuit is earthed through Resonance Sensing Resistor.
Anderson is supposedly in a class of his own with radiation , but then he was called the Ion King not the Radiation King.
SM ,tech boils down to  , quote : "restrict amps to allow voltage to take over"

IF SM tech is related to Horvath ,Puharich , Anderson , then did they restrict amps ?

puharich has 2 chokes , 1 is connected to earth
horvath has no chokes mentioned
anderson ....god knows what

IF SM tech is NOT related to Horvath , Puharich , Anderson , then theres 1 , 2 or 3 more avenues unexplored

all 4 are definitely HV approaches as mentioned in the patents

IF SM is the only 1 using restricted amps then what is the other option ?   
obviously that option worked out , at the very least 3 times , succesfully for 3 men who will forever be connected to Hydrogen