Author Topic: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???  (Read 10085 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2014, 23:33:10 pm »
We are patience people  :)
Take all the time...

Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2014, 16:38:46 pm »
I think you have to have a lot of money to order a large quantity of twisted pair, Stan's tech-brief calls for axially spiraled chokes, secondary and primary, but I found this DIY machine just searching for an alternative:

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/805268116/spool-spinner-makes-axially-spiraled-wire-twisted-0

First Ever Videos Showing Working DIY Spiral Spool Spinner Machine in Operation Making Twisted Pair and Winding Onto Bobbin Core.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2014, 13:53:05 pm by urizan »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2014, 22:32:59 pm »
I prefer side by side over spinning, the same way Tesla did it.

This is getting off topic, enough said.

P.S. If you want to spin the wires, use a common drill (two wires secured in the drill chuck and the other end of the two wires fixed to a secure object/location).
« Last Edit: May 02, 2014, 00:23:16 am by radiola18 »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2014, 01:15:43 am »
Stan had another idea. And even Tesla and Stan combined didn't know even half of what you seem to know.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2014, 14:43:38 pm »
Greetings.

Just had a thought to add.   Having the two chokes wound on the same core essentially makes them a transformer.  As we know with a transformer, the voltage and current between coupled coils are relative.  On  a 1:1 winding, the voltage and current should be the same across both coils.  However at any other ratio one coil will have a higher voltage with a lower current and the other coil will have a higher current with a lower voltage.

What does this mean?  This means that 1) there will be a higher or lower voltage across the terminal endpoints connecting to the WFC depending on how it is wired and 2) there will be a higher or lower current across the terminal endpoints connecting to the WFC depending on how it is wired and 3) there may be a power phase difference at both terminals of the WFC.

Point 3) is rather interesting to me.  If we are exerting this unsync'd phase approach on the water molecules what would be the effect on them?   In theory, shouldn't both sides of the WFC be in sync in order to exert maximum force on the water molecules?

TS
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 15:17:50 pm by timeshell »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2014, 15:12:22 pm »
Just had another thought after considering my last post a little more.

I often try to perceive electricity flow as water flow to visualize how it reacts in  a circuit.  Let's do this for a second.

Imagine a container with two pipes connected to it to represent our WFC.  However, this container is filled with a mixture of electrons and protons, which are naturally attracted to each other.  Now , importantly, we have to remember that this container is filled with a mixture of two distinctly different things, protons and electrons, and that we need two different forces to affect them.

Now, let's say one of the pipes coming off this container is bigger than the other pipe AND this pipe only draws protons (yes I know protons don't move, but this is a concept).  A volume of protons is drawn out slowly due to a lower pressure exerted from the larger pipe, dragging its electrons that are naturally attracted to it with it.  This naturally represents a higher current and lower voltage in electrical terms.

Then let's say the other pipe coming off this container is smaller than the other AND this pipe only draws the electrons.  A volume of electrons is drawn out quickly due to the higher pressure exerted on it by the smaller pipe, pulling against the force coming from the pressure of the larger pipe.  This naturally represent a higher voltage and lower current in electrical terms.

Then to top it off, the two pipes are being pulsed at different rates.

With this visualization in mind, what do you suppose would be the net effect on the flow on this container of protons and electrons?

TS

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2014, 15:43:45 pm »
Quote
P.S. If you want to spin the wires, use a common drill (two wires secured in the drill chuck and the other end of the two wires fixed to a secure object/location).

That's only going to give you a few feet of twisted wire and then where is that going to get you?

Stan's simple instructions were to twist the wire used in the VIC. Are you able to follow instructions?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Was Stan Being Dishonest About The Charging Chokes???
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2014, 07:38:59 am »
Timeshell, interesting analogy. With the two different wire lengths in the choke, it brings about a Beat Frequency Effect, like the Water Hammer Effect found in water pipes. That's what I think is going on.