Stan Meyer gasgun mixed frequency led references

[Login to see usernames]

From what i see in terms of viability of mantaining the hydrogen fracturing like in a rocket

what stanley meyer call easer

is basically a laser tube with two mirrors where laser is injected continuously to start maintain the atomic reaction by impeeding the recombination of hydrogen and oxygen

what if the sun is not what we think? what if is just oxygen and hydrogen too hot to glue ? continuously releasing energy?

[Login to see usernames]

How you are going to measure if or not the specific wavelenghts you have are affecting or not the molecules?

i would be important to know if or not the light is being absorbed…

most likely very few and very precise wavelengths can be absorbed the rest will only pass thru as if it was nothing…

Also coherence may be important too

i guess you could use some sort of light intensity detector …

I would give a try to those lasers used for engravers

Atoms must absorb their emission spectrum...they must.
I have a feeling 18 or so 300-500mw 410nm is going to be pretty obvious...if I wrap the VIC around the output....like atomic hydrogen flame obvious lol (🤞)

[Login to see usernames]

Detecting the absorption of a laser beam by air can be challenging since air is generally transparent to most laser wavelengths. However, certain conditions and techniques can help identify if a laser is absorbed or scattered by air. Here are a few methods you can consider:

Beam visibility: If the laser beam is visible along its entire path, it suggests that the laser is scattering off particles in the air. This scattering phenomenon is known as Rayleigh scattering and occurs more prominently for shorter wavelengths, such as blue or green lasers.

Beam attenuation: If the laser beam appears dimmer or weaker as it propagates through the air, it could indicate absorption by airborne particles or molecules. This effect becomes more pronounced with longer wavelengths, such as infrared lasers. Comparing the intensity of the laser beam at different distances can provide insights into potential absorption.

Beam divergence: If the laser beam rapidly expands or diverges over a short distance, it may suggest scattering or absorption. This occurs when the laser energy is transferred to the air, causing a decrease in the beam's intensity and coherence.

Detection equipment: Specialized equipment like LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) systems or laser absorption spectrometers can detect the absorption of laser light by atmospheric gases. These instruments utilize sophisticated techniques to measure the absorption and scattering characteristics of laser beams at specific wavelengths.

Environmental conditions: Certain atmospheric conditions can affect laser absorption, such as high humidity, fog, or airborne pollutants. In these situations, the laser beam may be scattered or absorbed to a greater extent, resulting in reduced visibility or power.

It's important to note that determining laser absorption by air requires careful analysis and often requires specialized equipment or knowledge. If you're working with lasers and need accurate measurements or assessments, it's recommended to consult experts or refer to scientific literature and research in the field.

I got 2 100mw 405nm laser diodes coming (410nm laser diodes are super expensive) the first one I bought was an overclocked 10mw....garbage burnt out under an hour.

[Login to see usernames]

From what i see in terms of viability of mantaining the hydrogen fracturing like in a rocket

what stanley meyer call easer

is basically a laser tube with two mirrors where laser is injected continuously to start maintain the atomic reaction by impeeding the recombination of hydrogen and oxygen

what if the sun is not what we think? what if is just oxygen and hydrogen too hot to glue ? continuously releasing energy?

From what I gather, Stan's "EASER" is akin to J.L.Naudins custom hydrogen filled vacuum tube. Hydrogen dissasociates and reassociates....
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/mahg/index.htm

Naudin recorded excess heat in his setup....

But I believe Stan figured how to pump out electrons (Photon annihilation).
"EASER"....Electron Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation...bouncing Hydrogen's emission spectrum back onto the Hydrogen

[Login to see usernames]

Hope you can see any change on the flame.. what you are going to do if there is no change in the flame?

How many watts has a lighter flame? How much would 10mw change a flame with 50w or more? Hope you get what I mean…

How you are going to know where to go?

Easer is energy amplification by stimulated emission of radiation

You should pay attention to Meyers words not replicators with no results just an advice

No one replicated anything good enough or we would not even be here talking! So be careful with what you read and believe it may bias your ideas and conclusions and bring you no where

I’ve being there long enough to give this advice

What I meant is that the hydrogen gas gun or hydrogen fracturing process may be coherent

And so if the reaction emits photons it will be useful to contain inside this mirrors I mentioned

Good luck

[Login to see usernames]

Hope you can see any change on the flame.. what you are going to do if there is no change in the flame?

How many watts has a lighter flame? How much would 10mw change a flame with 50w or more? Hope you get what I mean…

How you are going to know where to go?

Easer is energy amplification by stimulated emission of radiation

You should pay attention to Meyers words not replicators with no results just an advice

No one replicated anything good enough or we would not even be here talking! So be careful with what you read and believe it may bias your ideas and conclusions and bring you no where

I’ve being there long enough to give this advice

What I meant is that the hydrogen gas gun or hydrogen fracturing process may be coherent

And so if the reaction emits photons it will be useful to contain inside this mirrors I mentioned

Good luck

I've already witnessed some interesting results from just pulsed resonant cells (555 driven 2n3055) in pure %5 white vinegar (a beautiful prismatic electroplating developed with diode properties) . The gas output persists after t-off, and the same two volumes of 1cc of gas (one from straight electrolysis and one from resonant pulsed DC, without inductors)...the gas from the resonant DC cell had a noticeably louder concussion wave. 1cc of normal hydrogen/oxygen gas retorts like a weak firework.... "pop"...the same 1cc from the resonant DC cell (after the electroplating) sounded like gunshot "BANG" (made our ears ring).

Furthermore, this is just the gas processor, I have 3 concurrent builds developing....WFC (I have 19 tubesets), Gas processor (this 4" version, I have another 12" tubeset, and I have another 24" tubeset), and ozone/steam water spark plug (powered by the positive feedback loop circuit I posted)

The WFC and the Gas Processor work essentially the same way, and use the same driver. The Water spark plug will be a slightly different beast. I'm not even going to try to manifest every single efficiency Stan did, my main goal is ionizing hydrogen and the electron extraction circuit....those are the paradigm shifting technologies.

I'm finalizing my driving circuit, and working out resonance tracking atm....I have two digital potentiometers/reohstats on the way, I'm working on digital resonance tracking using an arduino to adjust the digital resistors based on sensing coil output of VIC. Also have a handful of CD4017 decade counters on the way to help this endeavor, I also have a handful of CD4046BE PLLs coming if the digital resistor adjustment of the CD4047BE doesn't work (but it should work just fine). Lastly I have a programmable FPGA dual channel frequency generator, with input comparator, sweep function, and phase lock loop built-in that I will hack if need be lol. Failure is not an option...

I also take in all sources, and can connect the dots...all replications have been focused on the WFC, yet that was NEVER the main mover....just an efficient source of hydrogen he actually abandoned...these are facts. The goal isn't and has NEVER been to make enough molecular hydrogen to run a car like it was gasoline....I repeat, NEVER!!!

[Login to see usernames]

Well I kind of disagree on your last sentence but this is just my theoretical point of view don’t worry. Keep on your ideas hope you can find a way to demonstrate this atomic reaction without getting hurt be careful please

[Login to see usernames]

Well I kind of disagree on your last sentence but this is just my theoretical point of view don’t worry. Keep on your ideas hope you can find a way to demonstrate this atomic reaction without getting hurt be careful please

Thank you, this just helped me answer your previous question about measuring the photo-absorbtion. This isn't actually an "atomic reaction" in the normal sense of that phrase. The word "atomic" just means single ionized atoms of otherwise molecular, stable hydrogen. In fact, the only thing that could happen to release harmful radiation, is the photoelectric effect, and photon absorbtion/annihilation at the electron (ejecting said electron) produces "soft-xrays". So, one could detect/measure the absorbtion indirectly with a ionization tube from a smoke detector which would register the soft-x-rays. 👌