Pages: 1 2 3 »   Go Down

Author Topic: Tony's VIC and Results  (Read 10791 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Tony's VIC and Results
« on: May 19, 2012, 20:59:03 pm »
Anyone reporting gas production with Tony's recreation of SM VIC?

My success has been limited, but I have manged to get a minuscule amount of gas production with no visible amps being used.  I used a ammeter that measures from 1 to 50 mA only and the meter didn't even register 1mA.

Anyone else?

TS
Logged

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2012, 18:30:20 pm »
I think everybody has the same issue here.
Its a very good attempt, but it is still electrolysis at the end.
Of course till someone proves otherwise... ;)

Logged

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 436
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2012, 18:45:21 pm »
Quote from: Login to see usernames on May 19, 2012, 20:59:03 pm
Anyone reporting gas production with Tony's recreation of SM VIC?

My success has been limited, but I have manged to get a minuscule amount of gas production with no visible amps being used.  I used a ammeter that measures from 1 to 50 mA only and the meter didn't even register 1mA.

Anyone else?

TS
Hi timeshell,

Do you have a VIC pack and a scope?

Br,
Webmug
Logged

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2012, 22:01:43 pm »
Quote from: Login to see usernames on May 20, 2012, 18:45:21 pm
Hi timeshell,

Do you have a VIC pack and a scope?

Br,
Webmug

I have a scope.  Not sure what you mean by "VIC pack".

The coils I was using in this instance are:
primary 100 22g
secondary 44 g resistor wire (450 turns) total resistance 9.6k
L1 44g resistor wire (100 to 110 turns) 1.9k
L2 44g resistor wire (100 to 110 turns) 2.1k
Feedback 44g copper wire (100 turns)

TS
Logged

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2012, 20:20:12 pm »
Could this be a problem?  The WFC SS tubes may need seasoning?  See PJ Kelly's chapter 10 http://www.free-energy-info.com/index.html, may take a 100+ hours run time.  Tubes should have white powdery coating, do not touch!  alexpetty.com has good discussion too.
Logged

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2012, 21:25:35 pm »
Yes, you can try adding some calcium on yr tubes, like many did, except for Meyer...
The best discussions where done here, btw.
Including guys like A. Petty. They all have been here or are still here.
I think making adverticements for other forums on this forum is disrespectful towards me and to the members who done so many work here, last years.

Steve
Logged

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2012, 14:15:37 pm »
With all due respect Steve, is this a contest?   Aren't we all working towards the same goal?

TS
Logged

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4621
    • water structure and science
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2012, 00:29:19 am »
Hi TS,

I just find it so strange that people are doing that.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 »   Go Up