Any ionizing radiation can cause you harm..

And actually also what Stan describe is an atomic reaction we don’t know what will come out from it he probably didn’t knew exactly either… he kept telling that won’t but if hydrogen is consumed it could even release beta particles and other types of radiation neutrons etc so protect your self buy a radiation meter for example some lead from batteries may help to block radiation to a certain degree also there are always isotopes in real life and so you must chose your risks wisely

There are this eye protection googles  for laser too you must get one too

There are this laser tubes with mirrors on side and two input output where you can pass the gases

I believe would be a good way to start

Also what I believe may be important is to mix the gas right away with non combustible gas to be able to make a fire and not a flash

Adding some alcohol seem to be a nice strategy to reduce the burn speed too it at least make it more controllable

Dude, "Nuclei decay of hydrogen" is a made-up term to describe anomalous heat output of mono-atomic hydrogen compressing down to molecular hydrogen (or likely here, a HO- hydroxyl) and not violate patent law for perpetual motion/energy. It's the same reason the energy equation is omitted for atomic-hydrogen in modern textbooks. It's not nuclear, and hydrogen is not consumed at all. Stan saying the nucleus of the high frequency hydrogen atom acting as energy aperture to release copious energy is the Aether my friend. There is no fusion, no fission, no alpha-emission, and no beta-emission. The only dangers are near-uv cornea sunburn (flash-blind) and the potential soft-xrays of photoelectric photon annihilation (Same soft x-rays as that retired skunkworks engineer's "radiolysis" water car...always forget his name)

P.S. If guide is compressive it will yield "explosive thermal energy" if the guide is diffuse, it yield just "thermal energy"

Well I kind of disagree on your last sentence but this is just my theoretical point of view don’t worry. Keep on your ideas hope you can find a way to demonstrate this atomic reaction without getting hurt be careful please

Thank you, this just helped me answer your previous question about measuring the photo-absorbtion. This isn't actually an "atomic reaction" in the normal sense of that phrase. The word "atomic" just means single ionized atoms of otherwise molecular, stable hydrogen. In fact, the only thing that could happen to release harmful radiation, is the photoelectric effect, and photon absorbtion/annihilation at the electron (ejecting said electron) produces "soft-xrays". So, one could detect/measure the absorbtion indirectly with a ionization tube from a smoke detector which would register the soft-x-rays. 👌

Hope you can see any change on the flame.. what you are going to do if there is no change in the flame?

How many watts has a lighter flame? How much would 10mw change a flame with 50w or more? Hope you get what I mean…

How you are going to know where to go?

Easer is energy amplification by stimulated emission of radiation

You should pay attention to Meyers words not replicators with no results just an advice

No one replicated anything good enough or we would not even be here talking! So be careful with what you read and believe it may bias your ideas and conclusions and bring you no where

I’ve being there long enough to give this advice

What I meant is that the hydrogen gas gun or hydrogen fracturing process may be coherent

And so if the reaction emits photons it will be useful to contain inside this mirrors I mentioned

Good luck

I've already witnessed some interesting results from just pulsed resonant cells (555 driven 2n3055) in pure %5 white vinegar (a beautiful prismatic electroplating developed with diode properties) . The gas output persists after t-off, and the same two volumes of 1cc of gas (one from straight electrolysis and one from resonant pulsed DC, without inductors)...the gas from the resonant DC cell had a noticeably louder concussion wave. 1cc of normal hydrogen/oxygen gas retorts like a weak firework.... "pop"...the same 1cc from the resonant DC cell (after the electroplating) sounded like gunshot "BANG" (made our ears ring).

Furthermore, this is just the gas processor, I have 3 concurrent builds developing....WFC (I have 19 tubesets), Gas processor (this 4" version, I have another 12" tubeset, and I have another 24" tubeset), and ozone/steam water spark plug (powered by the positive feedback loop circuit I posted)

The WFC and the Gas Processor work essentially the same way, and use the same driver. The Water spark plug will be a slightly different beast. I'm not even going to try to manifest every single efficiency Stan did, my main goal is ionizing hydrogen and the electron extraction circuit....those are the paradigm shifting technologies.

I'm finalizing my driving circuit, and working out resonance tracking atm....I have two digital potentiometers/reohstats on the way, I'm working on digital resonance tracking using an arduino to adjust the digital resistors based on sensing coil output of VIC. Also have a handful of CD4017 decade counters on the way to help this endeavor, I also have a handful of CD4046BE PLLs coming if the digital resistor adjustment of the CD4047BE doesn't work (but it should work just fine). Lastly I have a programmable FPGA dual channel frequency generator, with input comparator, sweep function, and phase lock loop built-in that I will hack if need be lol. Failure is not an option...

I also take in all sources, and can connect the dots...all replications have been focused on the WFC, yet that was NEVER the main mover....just an efficient source of hydrogen he actually abandoned...these are facts. The goal isn't and has NEVER been to make enough molecular hydrogen to run a car like it was gasoline....I repeat, NEVER!!!

You can perhaps run some calculation to find the optimum angle and 3d print a suporte to hold them

I believe it will increase the interaction with the water cell space

The ferrrite you can glue with super glue usually loose very little of the original permeability depending on where broken

I would also polish the electrodes to look like mirrors is not so hard

Use a car paste for polishing at the end phase

I used 60-220grit dry ceramic based sandpaper to start/remove welds, then 600grit ceramic wet sandpaper, then 2000grit ceramic wet sandpaper...finished the inner electrode with titanium dioxide buffing compound. Achieved a mirror finish, there's a few tiny hairline scratches here and there, I will do a final buff before assembly. Also tapped the inner electrode (will fabricate a brass or copper lug embedded in the PETG mount to attach) and a small tap on the outter electrode for electrical connection. Should bounce all that light around real nice. (Pics attached)

Detecting the absorption of a laser beam by air can be challenging since air is generally transparent to most laser wavelengths. However, certain conditions and techniques can help identify if a laser is absorbed or scattered by air. Here are a few methods you can consider:

Beam visibility: If the laser beam is visible along its entire path, it suggests that the laser is scattering off particles in the air. This scattering phenomenon is known as Rayleigh scattering and occurs more prominently for shorter wavelengths, such as blue or green lasers.

Beam attenuation: If the laser beam appears dimmer or weaker as it propagates through the air, it could indicate absorption by airborne particles or molecules. This effect becomes more pronounced with longer wavelengths, such as infrared lasers. Comparing the intensity of the laser beam at different distances can provide insights into potential absorption.

Beam divergence: If the laser beam rapidly expands or diverges over a short distance, it may suggest scattering or absorption. This occurs when the laser energy is transferred to the air, causing a decrease in the beam's intensity and coherence.

Detection equipment: Specialized equipment like LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) systems or laser absorption spectrometers can detect the absorption of laser light by atmospheric gases. These instruments utilize sophisticated techniques to measure the absorption and scattering characteristics of laser beams at specific wavelengths.

Environmental conditions: Certain atmospheric conditions can affect laser absorption, such as high humidity, fog, or airborne pollutants. In these situations, the laser beam may be scattered or absorbed to a greater extent, resulting in reduced visibility or power.

It's important to note that determining laser absorption by air requires careful analysis and often requires specialized equipment or knowledge. If you're working with lasers and need accurate measurements or assessments, it's recommended to consult experts or refer to scientific literature and research in the field.

I got 2 100mw 405nm laser diodes coming (410nm laser diodes are super expensive) the first one I bought was an overclocked 10mw....garbage burnt out under an hour.