Stan Meyer gasgun mixed frequency led references

[Login to see usernames]

Any ionizing radiation can cause you harm..

And actually also what Stan describe is an atomic reaction we don’t know what will come out from it he probably didn’t knew exactly either… he kept telling that won’t but if hydrogen is consumed it could even release beta particles and other types of radiation neutrons etc so protect your self buy a radiation meter for example some lead from batteries may help to block radiation to a certain degree also there are always isotopes in real life and so you must chose your risks wisely

There are this eye protection googles  for laser too you must get one too

There are this laser tubes with mirrors on side and two input output where you can pass the gases

I believe would be a good way to start

Also what I believe may be important is to mix the gas right away with non combustible gas to be able to make a fire and not a flash

Adding some alcohol seem to be a nice strategy to reduce the burn speed too it at least make it more controllable

[Login to see usernames]

Any ionizing radiation can cause you harm..

And actually also what Stan describe is an atomic reaction we don’t know what will come out from it he probably didn’t knew exactly either… he kept telling that won’t but if hydrogen is consumed it could even release beta particles and other types of radiation neutrons etc so protect your self buy a radiation meter for example some lead from batteries may help to block radiation to a certain degree also there are always isotopes in real life and so you must chose your risks wisely

There are this eye protection googles  for laser too you must get one too

There are this laser tubes with mirrors on side and two input output where you can pass the gases

I believe would be a good way to start

Also what I believe may be important is to mix the gas right away with non combustible gas to be able to make a fire and not a flash

Adding some alcohol seem to be a nice strategy to reduce the burn speed too it at least make it more controllable

Dude, "Nuclei decay of hydrogen" is a made-up term to describe anomalous heat output of mono-atomic hydrogen compressing down to molecular hydrogen (or likely here, a HO- hydroxyl) and not violate patent law for perpetual motion/energy. It's the same reason the energy equation is omitted for atomic-hydrogen in modern textbooks. It's not nuclear, and hydrogen is not consumed at all. Stan saying the nucleus of the high frequency hydrogen atom acting as energy aperture to release copious energy is the Aether my friend. There is no fusion, no fission, no alpha-emission, and no beta-emission. The only dangers are near-uv cornea sunburn (flash-blind) and the potential soft-xrays of photoelectric photon annihilation (Same soft x-rays as that retired skunkworks engineer's "radiolysis" water car...always forget his name)

P.S. If guide is compressive it will yield "explosive thermal energy" if the guide is diffuse, it yield just "thermal energy"

[Login to see usernames]

The gasses will only spontaneously trigger reassociation if magnetically compressed via VIC orthagonal field being co-wound around the gas processor (both gasses are negatively charged and will not collide/interact unless forced to do so).

[Login to see usernames]

Well I kind of disagree on your last sentence but this is just my theoretical point of view don’t worry. Keep on your ideas hope you can find a way to demonstrate this atomic reaction without getting hurt be careful please

Thank you, this just helped me answer your previous question about measuring the photo-absorbtion. This isn't actually an "atomic reaction" in the normal sense of that phrase. The word "atomic" just means single ionized atoms of otherwise molecular, stable hydrogen. In fact, the only thing that could happen to release harmful radiation, is the photoelectric effect, and photon absorbtion/annihilation at the electron (ejecting said electron) produces "soft-xrays". So, one could detect/measure the absorbtion indirectly with a ionization tube from a smoke detector which would register the soft-x-rays. 👌

I tried the AM ionizing parts of the smoke detector and blew H2 thru them in a tube. My test was not the best in the world, but i didnt see any change in the flame output....
It was a nice test anyway to do 

[Login to see usernames]

I wasn't expecting the radioactive source in a smoke detector to ionize H2...I was saying it could be used to detect harmful radiation from the high power discharge showed in my power amplification video. (I am now convinced at 100v input it is safe to experiment with the discharge without shielding...it produced no detectable ionizing radiation in neon tubes)

I've been on vacation, then had a large "honey-do" list to get done before the rains start next month. I haven't had alot of time to work on this lately. But I have been still doing what I can, when I can. Will post some things I have discovered. Mostly related to the water-spark plug circuit, and my new low impedance transformer as well.