I wasn't expecting the radioactive source in a smoke detector to ionize H2...I was saying it could be used to detect harmful radiation from the high power discharge showed in my power amplification video. (I am now convinced at 100v input it is safe to experiment with the discharge without shielding...it produced no detectable ionizing radiation in neon tubes)

I've been on vacation, then had a large "honey-do" list to get done before the rains start next month. I haven't had alot of time to work on this lately. But I have been still doing what I can, when I can. Will post some things I have discovered. Mostly related to the water-spark plug circuit, and my new low impedance transformer as well.

Yes that’s the problem

I’ve made it resonate in this mode too but actually the idea is that even if bifilar a non negligible voltage will appear on the cell due to the geometric configuration and so will induce a current in the coil that will mostly consume power and not allow the charge to keep on water

Basically the idea I’m having is to totally stop the current in that direction

And only allow high voltage charge equilibrares between the electrodes in way to keep charges stuck

The way from ground to cel makes what I call the resistance voltage buildup for the voltage zones

Such that the charge on the voltage zones become very intense

Water must act as a resistance

Consuming some power but allowing a force that will be very strong around the electrode structure

If electrons flow very slow in copper they may flow faster in water?

What if water flows?

In my tests current increased dramatically by adding water flow..

That’s was probably due to reducing the potential of the hydrogen electrode by mechanically taking the gas out from it

But what if current is in the opposite direction of the water flow? Would it get restricted?

Quote from: Login to see usernames on July 13, 2023, 08:58:08 am

Well I kind of disagree on your last sentence but this is just my theoretical point of view don’t worry. Keep on your ideas hope you can find a way to demonstrate this atomic reaction without getting hurt be careful please

Thank you, this just helped me answer your previous question about measuring the photo-absorbtion. This isn't actually an "atomic reaction" in the normal sense of that phrase. The word "atomic" just means single ionized atoms of otherwise molecular, stable hydrogen. In fact, the only thing that could happen to release harmful radiation, is the photoelectric effect, and photon absorbtion/annihilation at the electron (ejecting said electron) produces "soft-xrays". So, one could detect/measure the absorbtion indirectly with a ionization tube from a smoke detector which would register the soft-x-rays. 👌

I tried the AM ionizing parts of the smoke detector and blew H2 thru them in a tube. My test was not the best in the world, but i didnt see any change in the flame output....
It was a nice test anyway to do 

This month was really shitty on the sales and so I had to work like a dog to make things change

So I could not work not even a little on the project

Sad about that

Stanley A Meyer constructed a Steam Resonator

see attachment.