Recent Posts

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
91
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on July 16, 2025, 14:55:18 pm »
What the Circuit Does
C1 (1 pF) is your water-sensitive capacitor. As water increases, its capacitance goes up.

L1 (1 µH) forms an LC circuit with C1.

R1 (10kΩ) is a pull-up resistor.

AC Voltage Source simulates a small pulse or sweep input to show resonance.

Scope Output shows a voltage resonance peak.

🧪 How to Simulate Water Presence
Right-click the capacitor (C1).

Select "Edit", then change the value from 1pF to something higher (e.g., 50pF or 80pF).

Observe how the resonant frequency drops on the scope.

92
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on July 16, 2025, 14:54:51 pm »
Link simulator:

https://falstad.com/circuit/#%24+1+0.000005+0.11343094190700565+56+5+50%0AR+304+96+400+96+0+10000%0AC+400+96+400+208+0+1.0e-12%0AL+400+208+304+208+0+1.0e-6%0Aw+304+96+208+96+0%0Aw+208+96+208+208+0%0Aw+208+208+304+208+0%0Aw+400+208+400+272+0%0AR+400+272+304+272+0+1000%0Aw+304+272+208+272+0%0Aw+208+272+208+208+0%0Av+208+96+208+64+0+0+5+5+0+0+0.5%0Ao+5+64+0+512+5+0.0015625+0+1+5+3%0A
93
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on July 16, 2025, 14:52:11 pm »
We will build a capacitive water sensor that changes its capacitance based on water presence. The Arduino measures changes in oscillation frequency to infer water level or presence.

⚙️ Materials Needed
Arduino Uno (or any other)

Copper tape or aluminum foil (as capacitor plates), or a single tube set, ala Meyers

Plastic or glass container (non-conductive)

100 nH – 10 µH inductor

Resistors and wires

Optional: Oscilloscope or frequency counter module for precision

📐 Circuit Diagram (Simplified)
csharp
Copy
Edit
                 +5V
                  |
                 [R] 10kΩ
                  |
                 [C] Variable capacitor (made with water sensor)
                  |
    Pin D2 -------+---------> GND
              |
              [L] Inductor (100 nH - 10 µH)
              |
             GND
The capacitor is formed by two copper strips taped on the outside of a water container, or a single tube set ala Meyers

The water between them changes the dielectric constant → increases capacitance.

This changes the LC oscillator's frequency, which the Arduino can detect.

🔁 Code (Arduino – Frequency Measurement)
cpp
Copy
Edit
const int sensorPin = 2;  // Digital input pin for frequency
unsigned long duration;
float frequency;

void setup() {
  Serial.begin(9600);
  pinMode(sensorPin, INPUT);
}

void loop() {
  // Measure HIGH pulse duration
  duration = pulseIn(sensorPin, HIGH);
 
  if (duration > 0) {
    frequency = 1e6 / (2 * duration);  // Approximate frequency (in Hz)
    Serial.print("Resonant Frequency: ");
    Serial.print(frequency);
    Serial.println(" Hz");
  } else {
    Serial.println("No signal detected");
  }

  delay(500);
}
94
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on July 16, 2025, 14:50:03 pm »
This plot shows how the resonance frequency decreases as the dielectric constant increases, which simulates a capacitive sensor detecting water content:

Left side (εᵣ ≈ 1): Represents dry air — highest resonance frequency.

Right side (εᵣ ≈ 80): Represents pure water — lowest resonance frequency.

This is the core of how dielectric-based water sensors work: as water is introduced, the effective dielectric constant rises, the capacitance increases, and the resonance shifts downward.
95
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 28, 2025, 21:30:33 pm »
Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 28, 2025, 18:10:07 pm
I dont think that is possible having high voltage in the cell without high current. No phase lag between them, its a resistor.



exactly!     
96
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 28, 2025, 18:10:07 pm »
I dont think that is possible having high voltage in the cell without high current. No phase lag between them, its a resistor.

Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 21, 2025, 19:00:24 pm

I think i read that Meyer said that if you would see a higher voltage on the cell, then the output voltage of the vic transformer, that you are doing what he was doing....
Ramping voltage up
Think about that...


Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 21, 2025, 10:02:47 am
Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 20, 2025, 15:01:48 pm
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)
97
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 28, 2025, 16:45:57 pm »
If the voltage rises, current rises as we are dealing with something that has no phase lag between current and voltage...

Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 21, 2025, 10:02:47 am
Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 20, 2025, 15:01:48 pm
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)
98
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 23, 2025, 13:19:57 pm »
as Bob Boyce explained and also Stan tried to say, is that the trick is to get the right type of gas out of the water.
The right gas is 4 times more powerfull and because of that, you need 4x less of it.......

99
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 22, 2025, 13:19:37 pm »
Quote
Do not be a grumpy, forever unsuccessful old man.
I have a full of both theoretical and experimental work on my channel.
I do not know English and do all the work in Russian.
Now I translate my videos using AI into English.

First of all, im not a grumpy or "old unsucessful man", im in my 30's.
All you are digging and scraping about Meyer technology was already discussed, examinated, experimented by all of this great people on ionizationx and other foruns, with almost no result.
People got very frustrated about it, so do I.
Even people like Dynodon had the chance of trying the original Stans Vic and coils and nothing seems to work as Stan claimed.
The theory of the high voltage in the cell, the resonance LC and   the huge amount of gas production (7 lpm on 9 tube demo cell) was already debunked. 
Just want to save you some time and frustration, but i really appreciate you still on research after knowing all of what had been done and tested.
Cheers.
100
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 21, 2025, 19:00:24 pm »

I think i read that Meyer said that if you would see a higher voltage on the cell, then the output voltage of the vic transformer, that you are doing what he was doing....
Ramping voltage up
Think about that...


Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 21, 2025, 10:02:47 am
Quote from: Login to see usernames on June 20, 2025, 15:01:48 pm
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10