Recent Posts

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
41
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 19:43:32 pm »
But why you believe that? Did you ever got any monster gas production in this condition or maybe amp restriction with some gas?

So far as long as I ever see only magnetic field could indeed interfere with the ions

Please explain what you mean … I understand of course whatever scientific term you use

Let’s try to get somewhere

I tried hard to find any changes in water resistance with lab view and got nothing for a long time

Do you have different results?
42
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 14:08:36 pm »
Quote
What make you believe that? and according to your perspective why would current get restricted?
You need to understand the difference between these two attached schematic diagrams and how V=IZ is applied to the VIC at resonance.

You have to understand what the problem actually is before you can understand how to design the VIC to solve it. 
43
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 11:47:07 am »
What make you believe that? and according to your perspective why would current get restricted?

On my theory when current get restricted for example water have 220v backemf and I apply 200ma for example this result in at least44watts going in ( is just an example ) dis considering the resistance let’s say was 500ohm Woud cause hundred volts  drop consume for a total of 150w or so when ther is no energy acumulated applying 320v result in 640ma initially and when the restriction works it drops to 200ma

So this need a 200w power supply just to kick in the power and when it’s charged it drops to 144 (wrong ) because the restriction
(Correcting) I confused voltage for watts in this example actually this hundred volts on the 500ohm is consuming 20w so when “charged” in this example the power would drop to 64 w ! 20 for the resistance and 44 on the backemf
Again this is just an example so you can understand how it all relates in this idea

The resistance of bubbles would be linear increasing as the bubbles increase do you agree?

If the current is taken from a backemf the graph is exponential like Stan show the amp restriction graphs

Current = (vin - backemf) / ohms

The higher is the applied voltage the greater is the restriction because it’s resistance increases exponentially as energy get accumulated on the water cell in form of vibrations generation or if in for of induced electric

Like the piezo anti resonance it’s movement and deformation causes the bemf

44
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 07:00:47 am »
Incidentally, a very small amount of electrolysis is actually needed as gas is needed to be produced at the beginning to change the resistivity of the WFC to allow higher reactance and in turn a higher voltage to be applied to the WFC.  So we are not blocking all current as massive was suggesting.  A very small amount is still needed to start the process.
45
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 06:37:44 am »
When Meyer says he used voltage as potential energy and water as source of electrons it become evident that the cells together with this structure and fields can propagate potential thru the water tube but capture” current at the tips by using water as source of electrons

Another way of view it is you have two baths connected by a wire that goes to a grown inside each bath

Than each bath have a cell and they are connected like before in tandem with diodes shorting the cells

If we place this wire over the cooktop it will give the baths a voltage ac but the cells will use this ac potencial and drive current thru the diodes

In this case the propagation happen thru this grounds fluctuating by the wire

So the ground is receiving ac giving to each cell half reaction

If the ground is a catalyst it may help reducing the loss of potential there and it will probably heat up on this reaction

Heat is another form of energy that can cause voltage

Well the point is without this wire and grounds the induction is propagated thru water itself
46
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 06:14:51 am »
Induction cooktop is perhaps the easier way to show

You need a two cells connected to each othe with two diodes Basicaly shorting the anode of one to the cathode of the other

Than connect this two cell with a tube and fill with water and place on the cooktop

It will show voltage on the ends

Now if we maybe match the frequency of the cooktop tank with the length perhaps we get a surprise

The tubes can be made with pvc connection for example a c shape over the cocktop and some curves to make the cells vertical and farther than the field so it won’t heat up the cells metals

If the electrodes are catalytic probably is better but than it need a membrane to separate the gases to impeded from recombining

Each cell this way should generate hydrogen and oxygen at their respective electrodes where the current flow

The potential however come from induction captured and propagated by the dielectric and cocnductive properties of water
47
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 05:30:36 am »

I used to log in and keep an eye on Tektrical / electrotek. I guess people didn't pay much attention to him. He was investigating HV experiments, spark gaps, plasma etc. He was in his 70s, I guess he is no longer here. last log in Nov 2022. maybe Covid, maybe just time caught up.

Login to see usernames
Login to see usernames

I wouldn't be interested in HV across water. Theoretically, H atom is 1 proton and 1 electron. Electrons are the same thing out of a battery.
X and Z is based on freq. R is constant; V and I vary. The sawtooth output is max HV and then decays to zero. The primary circuit has switched off, so cannot be damaged by the secondary.
I experiment with HV FBT and my interest is short circuits, which is V/R = I, the R stays constant. This is why I was interested in elecktrotek's experiments with neon light transformer etc. V moves electrons, remembering there is a HV diode. FBT don't need to be "resonant", it is one pulse at any time and Idle time in between.

I never thought to ask electrotek what he thought of Stan Meyers. I don't think he was following SM


I remember reading his posts about it

My impression is that Meyer hid so well his ideas behind citation of other patents

Like the tay he Han and the ultrasonic one…

Reading that and seeing other parents that cited it as well I started to think Meyer was far more intelligent than he wanted to seem

I mean he had that thing but would not show not even talk about what really make it work but did in such a manner that show so many things and parts that keep people right off from it…

In Hollywood films this is how they explore the ideas they show you one thing to get you amazed so they can literally talk shit and you are still thinking on the shiny thing you saw before

Meyer used this to hide the essentials while he could show lots of details

In my research on the ultrasonic patent he cited I came across the phenomenon of anti resonance in ultrasonic piezo

That is welding piezo are driven this way to keep it feed with high voltage and low current so when you apply pressure and change the resonance it than suck power in and weld plastics

The thing is that applying it to water become clear that the cell is simply a resonant cavity but also possibly a transducer

So if driven to certain condition it will acumulate energy and this energy work back generating a back emf that cuts current flow

The Vic is simply a transformer to push power to the cell but it will only work if the cell have the correct fields configuration “magnetic” and frequency

Without it is just a piece of metal that will never have any other result than electrolysis

This lead to another idea that I started on the past ten years that was the water coil

Where I tried to induce the high voltage by electromagnetic

However I used a long water line and a transformer instead of a resonant atestem so although I could get some voltage the water ends when connected to each other would result in zero current

So I designed other ways of doing it

All that because if we get te energy from inside out the voltage drop should be less of a problem for efficiency since it’s reversed so we would be using the electricity and the gas



48
Sebosfato / Re: Did you guys saw this? T
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 04:43:24 am »
That’s what I’m suspecting too…

My gasket was changed some ten years ago but I guess my old mechanic didnt do something correct

Because since then the water disappear misteriously in short time


Also he started pushing some pink liquid for the water line instead of deionized water and I guess this was the source of the corrosion problems … it’s a mafia!  When I realized the water pump corrosion problems I started using my 0ppm water instead and never had to change the water pump in the last years

It was being replaced every 3 years

This pink liquid had a ppm over 500

Here in Brazil when you open the motor they want to make a sort of machining and sometimes soldering where it corroded

So they expect you to pay like 500 dollars for this work

My car is old fiat uno worth a thousand and half

It has injection system with lambda sensor

I believe this mafia of the radiator fluid aims to destroy the engines of cars so you have to buy new ones

Whenever we get two metals in contact with water with ions it will corrode so I guess it was their plan

I believe where it gets soldered the problem is even worse since there are different metals concentration so without having some sort of silicone in there to avoid water contact it will rust if the water is not pure…

I may try to open it on a cold day and try to put some torque on the screws in hope it close the leak

I say this because when it’s cold the metals are  less expanded so it may let some more torque

I’m just somewhat afraid of worsening the problem maybe braking a screw or something since I heard the screws need to be changed when you change the gasket too to avoid breaking I guess

Another concern is that I heard this engine called fire from 2003 had to be supported from below because it’s held on the suspension directly on one side of the engine head

Thank you a lot for the advice

Do you have some experience on that?


49
General Discussion / Re: S1R9A9M9 18HP Briggs riding mower engine ran on water( 2008)
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 01:49:16 am »


I wanted you to know that I finally found out what that

frayed/stub wire was for, on that original S1R9A9M9

triple coils assembly. It bugged me for a long time.

The first notion was that of a tap to ground for a

transformer type thing. Not so. A small Inverter box

was hidden in cement block, just as plastic tub was

covered and painted over that contained parts- not

foreyes of the public.

 From the paragraph in the old web forum from Georgia,

there was a reference called the 60 turns coil wire

test on car engine plug wire. The set up caused 

reduction of current on meter when the ignition fired

through the cable. The outer 60T of 20A current reduced

down repeatedly to 12 amps. There was an induced

reactance ohms in the coil that caused less power to

load. This is what happened when S1r coil was first

tested on Briggs engine 2008, using Inverter box.The

tap was for power leading to Inverter primary side

input. About 11amps was needed for Inverter. When

ignition fired, the power was reduced going to

Inverter. The wire was then snipped off, no longer used

and input would then come direct from JOINT of Battery

+ then later alternator stator DC rectified full wave.

The 18HP Briggs had stator of red and blk wire type, so

as called DUAL alternators. Output was 4A DC charger

and 5 amp AC for headlights.When bridge rectifier is

added , the output becomes 15v DC at about 14.8 Amps

capability.Power divided to Sir coils and Inverter. 11A

and 4Amp so as close to 15A total capability. Nathren

said source power needed was about 15amps.
 
The S1r coils was an ELECTROMAGNET to form magnetic

field for ATDC timing change extension and necessary

field for tips of spark plug. Nathren had said when

engine fired, the magnetic dropped during firing.(way

less current because of increased ohms added to load

resistor.) The 7 turns wire upper section affects the

extended tap wire when it was used.

7 turn 90 degrees winging coil has no iron core.  13T

coil has iron core as S1R9A9M9 electromagnet. The joint

of 2 wires had a stub cut off visible with frayed wires

in the enlarged photo.
50
General Discussion / Re: Back to Basics
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 19, 2024, 00:26:27 am »
The bottom line is, the resistance value of the chokes and secondary aren't as important as the reactance and impedance values being matched to the WFC at resonance because it is the reactive impedance that solves the equation of high voltage with low current.  So the WFC and chokes need to be designed with high reactive impedance within specific frequency ranges in mind based on the variable range of the capacitance of the WFC.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »