Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Today at 13:19:37 »
Quote
Do not be a grumpy, forever unsuccessful old man.
I have a full of both theoretical and experimental work on my channel.
I do not know English and do all the work in Russian.
Now I translate my videos using AI into English.

First of all, im not a grumpy or "old unsucessful man", im in my 30's.
All you are digging and scraping about Meyer technology was already discussed, examinated, experimented by all of this great people on ionizationx and other foruns, with almost no result.
People got very frustrated about it, so do I.
Even people like Dynodon had the chance of trying the original Stans Vic and coils and nothing seems to work as Stan claimed.
The theory of the high voltage in the cell, the resonance LC and   the huge amount of gas production (7 lpm on 9 tube demo cell) was already debunked. 
Just want to save you some time and frustration, but i really appreciate you still on research after knowing all of what had been done and tested.
Cheers.
2
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 19:00:24 »

I think i read that Meyer said that if you would see a higher voltage on the cell, then the output voltage of the vic transformer, that you are doing what he was doing....
Ramping voltage up
Think about that...


So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)
3
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 16:19:16 »
Its a lot easier to talk about it than do some research.

This boards are full of "theorists" but nobody risk anymore to try, experiment, research and do their homework.

"this works like this" oh... no ... "like this..."

Some people came to a conclusion that it simply doesn´t work at all....

Do not be a grumpy, forever unsuccessful old man.
I have a full of both theoretical and experimental work on my channel.
I do not know English and do all the work in Russian.
Now I translate my videos using AI into English.
4
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 12:19:41 »
Its a lot easier to talk about it than do some research.

This boards are full of "theorists" but nobody risk anymore to try, experiment, research and do their homework.

"this works like this" oh... no ... "like this..."

Some people came to a conclusion that it simply doesn´t work at all....
5
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 10:02:47 »
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)
6
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 09:54:52 »
How many people and opinions

7
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 20, 2025, 17:54:52 pm »
i agree with the resistance Ampere explanation.
However, i do think that the Meyer trick is to cut off the current flow when it exceets a certain amount of current....

Now we have another problem, as the cell behaves like a resistor, voltage and current are always in phase... So, high voltage = high amps, instantaneously. There is no brief time where we have voltage without current. No one managed to apply an lagged signal at the cell either... I've done this measurement many times. If you want to check it by yourself, use an non inductive resistor to measure current with an oscilloscope... The current will ALWAYS be in phase with voltage. The only way to have voltage without current in the cell is to keep voltage below the electrolysis threshold, below 2,7V roughly.
8
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 20, 2025, 17:39:27 pm »
i agree with the resistance Ampere explanation.
However, i do think that the Meyer trick is to cut off the current flow when it exceets a certain amount of current....

9
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 20, 2025, 15:01:48 pm »
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.
10
Tur55 / Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Last post by Login to see usernames on June 19, 2025, 12:45:56 pm »
The question is then how short the pulses should, when you pulse at 5khz?
And does the frequency has any meaning at all, except for the pulse duration?


Regards
Steve
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10