First: The pdf of Bearden is nice.
Second: What does he mean with it all?
Its in the Stan Meyer bla bla bla category, if you ask my opinion.
All the stuff makes sence on the first view, but at the end its all crap.
I say this from a practical point of view.
I tried to hit the water with HV spikes. I tried to hit the water with LV spikes. NO difference at all.
Have you ever shot a gun into water? If not, then watch the Mythbusters on TV. They performed that once.
As you can see, the bullet from a 0.50, which is very powerfull, didnot come futher then 1 meter and thats that.
So, water has a structure that consumes energy's.
It's a perfect filter for all kind of materials. Look into your cup of thee when sugar is dissapearing.
So, what about voltage spikes? Well, to make them "punch a hole", you need current flowing.
If you hit it with NO current, then the spike will go NO where.
So, you need current. Well, Stan and I agree on that part. Lucky for him...
I think Bearden will agree on that as well. Mr. Kanzius used also lots of power for his tests.
Not sure where i go with this post, but anyway. The only option left is the golden middle.
Try like 0.5 amps on your cell and pulse on top of that some spikes and see what comes out of that.
In phase or 180 degrees out of phase...I do not care at this moment.
At the end you have a voltage potential with electrons flowing = current.
If you do not use a steady limited currentflow, the water will always return into equilibrium.
SO, all the trouble of pulling the molecules apart will be for nothing.
There is one exception. It seems to be possible to gain the freed electrons with an EEC circuit.
There are some options open.
br
Steve
