Attention Attention !!!!

[Login to see usernames]

We must uncover every meaning of this pdf .

This is the most important knowledge ever , how to we *unhappen* bonds ?

Forget dielectric breakdown by high voltage across space of water , I wanna *unhappen bonds* .

Read and re-read this document .

[Login to see usernames]

i already have this.....along with a ton of other pdfs.......if you want other amazing pdfs i can post them there is even an entire book on scalar waves......but i need some sort of poll.....i have many things to do.....

edit: i didn't have this one just checked.....i am reading it now.

[Login to see usernames]

once again.....so many parallels with so many other people's work......tesla, ed gray, lindemann's writings, and seredas writings........

[Login to see usernames]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4FGkU841UI&feature=related

Now watch this video 3 minutes and beyond .

[Login to see usernames]

I believe we touched opon something interresting yesterday , outlaw was thoerizing on this .

I said the following .

So what if it were possible to *pump* our water (dipole) , I believe this is what Stan was referring too , this is the broken symetry we are after , this is how I believe Daniel Dingel was creating electricity , this is what Stephen Meyers was saying . The *art of pumping*

What if we could do this , would the water then be charged ( like a capacitor ) , could we then apply a polarizing force using the waters *own magical charge* to break itself in a unipolar way with a diode in the circuit .

Or maybe this is just the way the gas gets more GTNT power .

Plz discuss ,  I believe this hypothesis takes into account why we simply cant charge our water capacitor and fills in the blank holes .

[Login to see usernames]

I believe we touched opon something interresting yesterday , outlaw was thoerizing on this .

I said the following .

So what if it were possible to *pump* our water (dipole) , I believe this is what Stan was referring too , this is the broken symetry we are after , this is how I believe Daniel Dingel was creating electricity , this is what Stephen Meyers was saying . The *art of pumping*

What if we could do this , would the water then be charged ( like a capacitor ) , could we then apply a polarizing force using the waters *own magical charge* to break itself in a unipolar way with a diode in the circuit .

Or maybe this is just the way the gas gets more GTNT power .

Plz discuss ,  I believe this hypothesis takes into account why we simply cant charge our water capacitor and fills in the blank holes .

I always liked the way Stan's cell was pressurized. (He had a PRV - Pressure Relief Valve attached of course) So many of other cells being tested are being operated at atmospheric pressures. Does HHO generation increase as pressure is increased?

I see so many tube cell designs securing the tubes very well, thus, the mechanical force of some of these new cell designs inhibiting the resonance properties of the tubes while the electromagnetic generated signals are applied. Stan only secured the base of his inner  tube and used spring steel for the outer tube.

Maybe it's the pumping action that occurs when bubbles rise to the surface pulling more water up between the tubes to be electromatically charged.

I like the fact that Stan used the bump method with power on/off/on/off. Maybe it was also the reason he chose 304 stainless over 316 stainless in his tube design. 304 of course is slightly ferromagnetic. Power off was enough to allow the gas bubble to separate/release from the tube and escape, while the residual magnetic property in the 304 tube material maintained water molecule electron alignment until the next "on" phase could separate. So what if the water gets a little dirty.

Per Admiral Griffin, Stan delberately deoptomized his demonstration cell used in his 1980 patent and used 14" length tubes. Why are 27" length tubes reported as being optimal and so explosion risky? Why is snow white?

I personnally did a tube test and even though  both inner and outer tubes weighed the same with the smaller tube being about an inch longer the resonant frequencies of each didn't match. I will need to notch the outer tube so they both ring the same (like tuning forks).

Thanks for your Tom Beardin link Dankie! I'll have to study this more.

Flag 

[Login to see usernames]

the danger in longer tubes is the fact that the water molecules pulsed at high potential difference(this is what i will call it from now on instead of voltage) splits the water then as it continues to float upwards through the pipes it will become ionized and as it floast higher it will become unstable and eventually ignite, also igniting all hydrogen within the container......i personally do not believe in the "tuning fork theory"......i believe in the waveguide theory as the true resonant action not the physical resonant condition of the tubes such as a pipe organ.....that for one is never mentioned in stan's technology......maybe harmonics and multiple frequencies such as bob boyce and andrija puharich's work but stan's is a different.

stan always waited for his cell to build up 6psi of pressure before using it's gas.......he says this in the new zealand house lecture videos....

[Login to see usernames]

I believe more pressure means stunted gas production . At least this is what  Bob Boyce is saying .