thanks dankie i have many hours of pondering. the best way to understand is perspective. you got to visualize and try to understand everything whats going on in the wires them self on a atomic level. visualize how emf can constantly displace the excitors in a multi phase set up (alternator). now remember how stan says the voltage will cause alignment in the plate material. what kind of alignment??.. now think on how there alignment could be 180 out from each other giving clockwise and counter clockwise scalar wave? the differential vortex? idk still pondering lol.
outlawstc
You mean the plates themselves have both magnetic *flux lines* going opposite to eachother . The thumbs rule thing , those kind of flux lines ? Perhaps they are crossing eachother and causing the elephants to go against eachother .
Perhaps he is trying to *oppose the entropy* ?
Everything is in constant motion like Bearden says ... From the infinitely big to the infinitely small .
I am intruiged by what bearden says , every dipole can keep a bit of energy and not thrown it back out in the time domain ?
Stan is talking about an *energy generator* , a *static energy generator* , and he aint talking about the EPG . He's talking about how he gets more energy out than in . Seems to me like this is what Stan meant . What if Stan's final technology was so revolutionnary that the whole physics would have to be reinvented . This is bigger than a simple water car , this is totally new science .
There's a few things that are clearly impossible with Meyers . The water is simply not breaking apart with higher voltage , it is not holding its charge , it is never pure enough under normal conditions . Meyers never coated his plates , so I believe this coating ravi stuff is simply disinfo .
There is all this stuff about the state space tickling , stuff that is not found in the puharich papers or anyone else .
So I believe that everybody had his own method , some were better than others .
Next step is , if we know dingel could pull some electricity from this , why wouldnt Meyers have done the same and have a double usage for that extra unaccounted for charge ? This new hypothesis fills in the mysteries of how exactly do we get that water to charge , whats all this mumbo jumbo that Meyers talks about ?
It fills in the gap , it goes along with other theories from respectable people .
