Info

[Login to see usernames]

guess I misunderstood the above 

[Login to see usernames]

http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Standing_wave

this, except with voltage;

[Login to see usernames]

hahah i think he means rubber band effect as is in the stretching and pulling of the water molecule over and over again.

[Login to see usernames]

hahah i think he means rubber band effect as is in the stretching and pulling of the water molecule over and over again.

There is something with the opposing waves , what the term *rubber-banding* means is not necessary to understand , it is jargon .

[Login to see usernames]

I remember how Bearden talked about how you could *tickle* a dipole and a charge would appear from nowhere , it would  *act as a capacitor*  without us *putting any electrons* into it ... The charge would appear from nowhere , from the nucleaus itself .

I think he referred to this as *pumping* ...

I believe we have underestimated this side of the story .

[Login to see usernames]

jargon or a big hint to what the voltage looks like, comparing it to the rubberbanding effect in the picture above.

you've read that in the precursor engineering doc, these docs possibly explain it more in depth.

voltage standing wave ratio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSWR

[Login to see usernames]

Lets say it was possible to *charge* a water capacitor without any electrons flowing through , what if we could *tickle the state space* or *pump* that water and somehow , someway , it keeps that *electrical charge* and we let its own charge (coming from nowhere) break itself in a unipolar way , with the diode in the circuit .

This seems to be a bit similar to avramenko , some crazy unknown thing .

[Login to see usernames]

hahah i think he means rubber band effect as is in the stretching and pulling of the water molecule over and over again.

perhaps
it's an option

since the voltage waves travel inside the wfc wave guide, standing waves are a possibility. I connected the dot's, perhaps to the wrong ones