Ya well i dont believe things are so complicated ... Stan might be hiding a few things but not to that extreme ... Unfortunately i trust in Stan and his jibberish is way too complex to be made up...
I dont think he would have given himsell all that trouble of making different injectors and gas processors if he could simply feed enough gas and power a car using his cell and nothing more... He says in the international evaluation report that the cell only could never fully power a vehicule and i believe his in that respect ...
I dont believe Stan was lying to us that much ... The patents were his anyways and he was protected by law... Everything in the tech brief is mostly off-patent why would he care if some amateur could replicate it in his garage
... Thats what he worked for he even says so many times ... He knew he could never get throught the market place and he wanted it to be simple so a regular guy could replicate ...
I am mostly interested in the instant explosion of water and believe what his brother Steven Meyers said... You dont need to produce lots of gas... I dont believe he had a single working method and eveything else was cover-up and unworkable ... I trust in Stan's good will he wasnt such a hater and a trixter ...
I know for a fact that he describes VIC coil 6-1 on video in 1993 ... It couldnt have been a CIA added picture ...
from section 5 to section 10 its mostly unpatented material so i dont see how he tried to trick the patent office when those designs never even got patented ....
In fact none of his powercoil designs were ever patented ... And i dont see how Hydrocars could rule out figure 8-10 when this is in fact a variaton of the VIC all-on-1 core design from figure 6-1... I doubt he made a coil like this ...
Here is a pm from 2curious4wfc , i know for a fact that he wouldnt lie to me and the following is 100% true
don't get me wrong, but can you please cut down on the PM a little bit as I have no time left for other things.
Thanks.
TWO, resonances, yes. An electrical one, used to achieve high voltage with little effort.
And an acoustical one (or mechanical if you will), eg. oscillation of particles.(the nucleus and electrons of the atoms)
Yes, it does makes things more complex, that's why many seem to have trouble. This SM
WFC is not a joke, it is quite cutting edge. Too much for most.
my question to him : I'm not really sure what Stan means anymore by *negative voltages* , could this possibly be 2 opposite currents colliding inside the cell , or does this just mean more potential difference like a house +120 and -120 = 240 volt difference
Maybe this circuit have bipolar currents of same time phase and equal intensity , Plz have a look at this quote ....
Right, you got it. Two equal AND opposite voltages (or minor currents if you will) with respect to
a virtual ground, as per SM quote.
Yes, they arrive at the same time in the cell. So particles (or molecules if you will are been stressed
equally from each electrode).
So your example is not quite right !!! Correct it would be: +120V + -120V = 0V
So, look at figure 10-5. See it now ? See how he shows a mirror image of the positive waveform vs. the negative waveform and in the center line exactly zero ?
Soja, read this quote carefully, as he means exactly what he says. It is all true and makes all sense.
Think about it ! Read and then think about it again and you will see and understand.
In the mean time, educate yourself in Math, Physics and Electronics if you really want to build a
working device yourself. Don't relay on others to fix your problems remotely and online. This is
not going to happen. You will have to do that yourself.
Really, the MIB messes with your links, perhaps you should get a better internet connection ?
At this point you are nowhere near to be of any interest to any MIB whatsoever. Once you have
a working device and once you set to start selling it, that's when you need to start to worry about
them.
Anyway, start building....
