Author Topic: Deleted  (Read 11061 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2008, 04:47:49 am »
simple logic? please show us your results.

stay on topic kinesis

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2008, 00:31:45 am »
then let people speak instead of going to every thread and saying it doesn't work and that your way is the only way....

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2008, 02:14:56 am »
then let people speak instead of going to every thread and saying it doesn't work and that your way is the only way....

Ok... great idea HMS-776 .... it seems plausible that what you say is true .... great info  ;D

it also goes with what i have been reading ... great to see an original post like this  ::)







« Last Edit: November 11, 2008, 20:49:20 pm by dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2008, 05:55:25 am »
Quote
We dont need anymore comments like this who describe the descriptions according to opinions.... unfounded and weak opinions at that...
a statement at that is incredibly contradictory to this thread. HMS-776 is posting in formation that IF ANYTHING is beneficial to the understand of similar principles......and your saying that it is unfounded and weak opinions or OUTRIGHT INCORRECT intellectual properties......your statements are complete fallacies......you offer the least to this community.....you offer no insight......you are like an organized religion.....only your way is correct all others are failed.......


Quote
Of course my way is the only way and you should listen more to me ... i have already analyzed it .... you dont have the ressources or the knowledge to go any other way ... and you dont even know where to start ...

IF YOUR WAY IS THE ONLY WAY I WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE YOU SHOW US THE TINIEST AMOUNT OF PROOF THE SMALLEST......ANYTHING.....AND I MEAN ANYTHING.....NOT another screen capture.....show us something tangible.....HMS-776 parallels of parametric resonance and stanley meyers resonance are of incredible similarities and offer great steps into understanding things which are apparently still not understood by not being replicated to patent ideology......


the you have the nerve to say i don't have the resources......or the knowledge......WOW.......if by resources you mean your ss wire then yes......i could care less......but believe me i have the equipment, the resources, and the money.......and if i didn't know where to start i wouldn't be producing the gas i'm producing.......have you even split water yet?

SO PLEASE once and for all let people voice there ideas.....SUPPRESSION AND NEGATIVITY OF ANY KIND ONLY INHIBITS THE GROWTH.......HMS-766 topic of parametric resonance is more useful information posted in one post then you have ever posted......your wire is't even enameled......you dont have water splitting apparatus, and from the looks of it not one tool of measurement....oscope, lc meter, high voltage meter.......i'd be damned if you have a good TI calculator seeing that the highest math your in right now is calculus 2 seeing that your a college freshman.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4706
    • water structure and science
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2008, 07:39:14 am »
Hi,

I would appriciate not calling eachothers dum or stupid.. Till the moment someone shows us a working setup accoording to stan, i would like you to say that you DISAGREE with one others theory.
Please keep all those unusefull emotions of this forum.

br
steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2008, 07:42:26 am »
i agree perfectly stevie.....if only it could sink into dankie's tiny "danked" brain......he has consistently attacked everyone....single handedly.....it is my fault also for requesting you to allow him back on.......my bad.

tester

  • Guest
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2008, 11:46:13 am »
Whoever instigates the next battle gets banned for 2 weeks!!!!!! no more no more no more no more
 
 

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Parametric Resonance
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2008, 21:17:45 pm »
Whoever instigates the next battle gets banned for 2 weeks!!!!!! no more no more no more no more
 
 

I'm sorry Hydro i should have never reacted that way .... I was just telling why i dot think this is possible bases on my observations ...

And maybe HMS-776 , can learn to communicate his ideas better , perhaps communicate your ideas with less vague description without using a bunch of long boring links in the hopes that i see what you see  ... maybe quote us a part you tought was crucial ???

We are talking about energy from the vacuum here ... a coil that achieves this cant be explained in 5 lines lol......  is it too much to ask lol ??

But no .... we play kindergarden here .... where everything is fine ... and everybody has wonderful ideas ... where free energy is easy and everybody is a visionnary genius .... lets all put on a teletubbies costume now .... Lets all sing a song and hold hands under the rainbow ...

Now that H20power , our genius savior , has come back , maybe he can tell us where in the brief stan talks about same inductances .... Maybe he can also tell us why his theory goes against everything i read about the primary being isolated from the actual circuit and how  his idea will ago along and respect figure 7-13 .... ???