So I must insist on the importance of this geometry .Theres no specific size for the injector , only that the distance between the two cones are .01 inch to .06 , it was small enough to hold the water by capilarity ,i believe and that it was small as show in the videos of him holding the injector. Stan suggests about a 4.5 ratio or more from the beginning of the taper to the end tip , whats funny is that the geometry acts as a "natural step charger" ..This isnt the right terminology i know , but lets say the beginning area of the taper is 10mm diameter and the end is 2mm diametre ,Then the voltage will be stepped up from 10,000 to 50,000 following the exact same ratio as the taper itself. The gap distance between the two cones always stays the same. Anyways.... everybody should read the first 2 pages of section 6, for me its pdf page 131-132 of the SMTB . In his statement he assigns letters from A to D to every section of the taper . As the water travels through section A to D it is seperated into HHO , the electrons of the atoms are sent to a higher energy orbit untill 4 electrons of the oxygen atom are stripped away near the end tip . As it is expelled outward past secton D is explodes with high energy because the atoms cant recombine , all that without without damaging the cell in any way since they are exited out beyond the cell acting as a quenching circuit at the same time . So this is like a laser energizer / electron extraction all in one without the painful unspecifics of where should the LEDs be?, what LEDs to use? , Where do i put this fukkin extraction grid? The taper solves all these , Above all , its fairly simple geometry to have machined and requires less material.
here is a picture of what exactly is a taper
http://www.mediafire.com/?tje2ontnmcw
