Author Topic: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview  (Read 14194 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2008, 12:15:16 pm »
Thank you Dankie, details can be important,


So the clue is that we really don`t need to convert water to hydrogen/oxygene?..

And a newer fuel injected car is not worse to convert than older carburated cars?..

His brother Stanley made a water splitter spark plug so i can understand he is saying that, but in that kit he was planning to sell to convert all our cars even contains a small
hydrogen cell with the water splitter plugs and some iginition timed solenoid valves and the famous air gas prosessor.

What is your thougts about this Dankie?..  Are you working on the VIC coil for use with some "water splitter spark plugs"?.. 


Best regards

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #17 on: December 13, 2008, 18:46:15 pm »
The gas pricessor is the injector.

I'm following my gut and the evidence , i'm working on this , slowly but surely ...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #18 on: December 13, 2008, 21:57:24 pm »
you are 30 percent correct......and 70 percent incorrect....

the gas processor is by far it's own entity.....

the water injector does ionize the split water.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #19 on: December 13, 2008, 22:21:34 pm »
i am right 100%

that single little piece of metal performs the electrical polarization process and the hydrogen fracturing process.


JAFO

  • Guest
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #20 on: December 14, 2008, 04:35:59 am »

@Dankie

Now take what you just posted and apply Roy McAllister's videos and you got the whole system wrapped up...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2008, 09:48:07 am »
(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/donkey.jpg)

i'll give you about another 10 days before you say "i've figured it out all over again" and come up with some new theory......your always saying you have figured it out and you understand it....yet change your mind within a few weeks.........i'm still pretty sure you haven't read the ENTIRE tech brief......

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2008, 17:33:28 pm »
Your picture is in direct contradiction with my text ... so who is right ???

Lol dont you think i noticed that piece?  Its probably for the exhaust. Its probably for the exhaust gas , maybe an air reclaimer  of some sort .

What kind of gas processor ? exhaust gas processor ? thats just a picture with a name on it and explains nothing ... If you read carefully the text i have shown above you realize that the water goes into the injector and blows up at the tip of the injector ... So your "gas processor" is nowhere present in the electrical polarization process or the hydrogen fracturing process ...

So that piece is either used for the ionized gas , or it is a exhaust gas processor . Since this technology requires an exhaust gas processor i'm betting 50$ that it is used for the exhaust ...
« Last Edit: December 15, 2008, 18:14:57 pm by dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Stephen Meyer Radio Interview
« Reply #23 on: December 16, 2008, 03:46:29 am »
you have not read the tech brief......let me ask you what is the purpose of quenching tubes?....if only water is flowing through them (as you state) then what is the purpose?.......I KNOW YOU ARE NOT ON THE RIGHT TRACK AND HAVE NOT UNDERSTOOD THIS PROCESS YET. GOODLUCK DANKIE DO NOT CLAIM YOU UNDERSTAND BEFORE READING.....READ THE TECH BRIEF.....you are wrong.