right on h20! yes it may be sad, but i have a path just like you do. I have been so far into stans work i cant even begin to explain to anyone the facts so i don't bother. I can understand why you would think that stan used high voltage low amps, for one this is a big problem, because if stan used high voltage low amps, and if he did find the resonate Freq of wator than he never would have had that big clunky alternator on his dune buggy to start with, nor the clunky driver motor or that clunky rotory converter.
i pointed out that stans "tube" consumes 4.4 amps per tube, 40 amps for all 9 tubes and it is also in his test of evaulation. I am currently working on "how to make them tubes consume that while others are busy on the chase for resonation", they dont yet realize how hard it is to make a tube with such a gap consume that, and to be honest i've done a pretty damn good job at doing it... So far i have ran an engine on as little as 500 cc's a min by ionizing the gas just like stan did, and herman, converting good ol 1h to 2h.. so basicly stan and herman did the same thing when making isotop hydrogen, when you read the patents you have to kinda read between the lines, when herman refers to 2h hard water he is actually meaning hydrogen with neutrons in it, which is 2h, just what stan used. the problem is the 2H is not volitile like gasoline but like deisel, this is where herman used Xrays and stan lasers, they both altered the gas and stans methode was the vic, this is where you're seeing high voltage low amps with resonate frequencies, the gas charges, it dont cost anything to ionize the gas.
now i've pointed out the test on page 60, and there is enough information there "math" ,"definitions", how too's on that page for you to actually replicate The test of stans in which he is explaining by using a 1 liter cavity. in which where stan produced 7 liters a min using a 1 liter cavity where 1 psi is = to 1 liter of hydroxy is "impossible", how do i know? well i tested it and confirmed it was impossible, this means if stan would have told the truth in that test of evaluation then his work would have been easily cracked, this is why he hollared 7 liters a min, but sadly when you use the math and conduct the test it tells no lie. My ideals and road of direction is based on facts, what was left behind and what is as well as what is possible and what is not possible.
I respect the ones thats trying to find the resonate freq of wator, if they succeed then they will be the wator gods! But im sorry to hear you think stan broke water with resonance and at the same time im happy that you're working on breaking water with resonance. anyhow, this is no longer my forum, i chose to step down while the destraction was at work. i'm already making ways to do the possible.
if i have come across harsh in any way then honestly i do not mean to, sometimes my way of wording is not that great, i am just getting across to you that i am not on the same road your on, eventually when people do start to realize what is what, i might not be around.
god bless your tubes man.
