Author Topic: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....  (Read 11420 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4780
    • water structure and science
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2024, 09:06:20 am »
Chambers was trying to change the spin direction of the hydrogen atoms ...

Not sure if that worked...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2024, 22:36:38 pm »
If you have low current at the cell, the voltage at the cell will be Current (I) x Cell resistance (R).

For an 100Ohms cell, you need 1 amp to give you 100V.

Someone need to demonstrate how to violate ohms law first to assure that he had high voltage at the cell.

It is impossible to reach kV ratings in an 80Ohms cell using miliamps... And there is no phase shift between current and voltage at the cell...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2024, 23:28:18 pm »
The Stan Meyer Patents refer to new technology, without any electrolysis at all.You have to study the literature from Ohio. Books- the birth of new technology, and Water Fuel Cell company Manual. They also list the Patents by number for study.  3 seconds on one amp TRANSFORMER PRIMARY, then secondary lower high volts to high ohms resistance cell as used ONLY for polarity alignment of water molecules. Then 7 seconds off. (pulsed burst mode) During off time, flyback WAY high volts hits > than 1500volts PRESSURE that pops apart the water molecules easily to ionized atoms as H+ H+ O- - . (more energy than H2 + O2.) The more complicated later final circuit uses laser light to excite the outer Oxygen orbital electrons to further outer level, , and then can be removed by wire flow, to make an even more unstable content gases that can be fired as usual in engine for greater energy output or in blast furnace. (over unity) This state then,NAME  of fuel- is company Patented and is  called Thermo Explosive Energy.. The L inductors and Cap of plain water cell resonates at same frequency of input high frequency ferrite transformer initiator. The concentric tubes also slightly vibrate. The higher resistance of water, the more gases evolve. Three levels of design of hydrogen generator.

There was talk way back in time of the sale of large volume of units sold to US government for warehouse storage, until the oil supplies started to run out for energy for the US.

See also data regarding fluid level sensors for industrial plant of large liquid vats. They use capacitance of liquid and frequency resonance to determine inside fluid level.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2024, 23:55:37 pm by russrHHO »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2024, 00:00:28 am »
Sure, I need to study more, sorry for beign so stupid.

Its obvious that Stans tech have nothing to do with ALL current stablished physics laws, he made his own laws of course. How can I be so stupid?

Sorry.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 121
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp7oJf9m5gRPBi5PFhtsK_w
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2024, 18:34:44 pm »
If you have low current at the cell, the voltage at the cell will be Current (I) x Cell resistance (R).

For an 100Ohms cell, you need 1 amp to give you 100V.

Someone need to demonstrate how to violate ohms law first to assure that he had high voltage at the cell.

It is impossible to reach kV ratings in an 80Ohms cell using miliamps... And there is no phase shift between current and voltage at the cell...

You are thinking correctly.
Watch Ravi's channel where he shows the white coating on the pipes. This plaque, or rather its resistance, increases the voltage at low current.
There are about 5 methods to reduce the current to 0.001 ampere, but they must be used all together and synchronize their work with each other

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2024, 21:24:43 pm »
If you have low current at the cell, the voltage at the cell will be Current (I) x Cell resistance (R).

For an 100Ohms cell, you need 1 amp to give you 100V.

Someone need to demonstrate how to violate ohms law first to assure that he had high voltage at the cell.

It is impossible to reach kV ratings in an 80Ohms cell using miliamps... And there is no phase shift between current and voltage at the cell...

You are thinking correctly.
Watch Ravi's channel where he shows the white coating on the pipes. This plaque, or rather its resistance, increases the voltage at low current.
There are about 5 methods to reduce the current to 0.001 ampere, but they must be used all together and synchronize their work with each other

You are right, I already saw that at Ravi's channel, but all of Stans tubes have no white coating on it, so he must be using another technique...

Another point is that we cant use anything between the tubes and the water as insulator. A capacitor polarization occurs at the dieletric. Our aim here is to have displacement charges at the water, which should be our "dielectric". Anything in between will be charged instead of charging the water.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4217
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #14 on: September 04, 2024, 08:33:19 am »
As recently i tried to point

Adding a foil Of Mylar roled between the concentric cells Force the Electric field 90degrees and lengthen it

Suming with magnetic fields

Bang

Now its high resistance

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Reply #15 on: September 04, 2024, 15:55:53 pm »
As recently i tried to point

Adding a foil Of Mylar roled between the concentric cells Force the Electric field 90degrees and lengthen it

Suming with magnetic fields

Bang

Now its high resistance

Well, there is no evidence that Stan put anything between his tubes and water. You'll charge the mylar instead of charging the water, which I think is not the objective here. Insulating the tubes avoids current flow, which I believe is necessary (even a few miliamps).

But worth a try.