Author Topic: Stanley Meyer demystified  (Read 6703 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Stanley Meyer demystified
« on: June 19, 2023, 01:59:43 am »
I've spent a great amount of time analyzing patents, reading theories, and creating my own experiments over the better part of a decade...I'm at the point I believe I can adequately put it all together, I will start this thread to lay out the premise, and document results. (Most of my equipment/experiments were stolen from me in 2010, I am essentially starting over...only archive that really remains is the few videos left on my youtube channel @Zer0pointunlimited )....

Stan created, and patented several iterations of his devices...it is my belief now, that Stan, like so many others, intentionally confused and misled people for a couple of reasons. First, his most complicated device, "The Water Fuel Cell" is a culmination of multiple principles already in public domain at the time he released it. Those being, observations of bipolar dynamics of water and high voltage accumulation of charge pioneered by Lord Kelvin (think of the famous Thunder Storm experiment ran in reverse), phenomena discovered by Nikola Tesla in his Utilization of Radiant Energy patent regarding photons impinged on a capacitor plate through a transparent insulator (Stan's gas processor) and observations Tesla made on the discharge of a condensers(capacitors) into inductors, and lastly, the phenomena of nascent, aka mono-atomic, aka "Atomic" hydrogen, explored by Langmuir.

The hang-up most people quickly come to, that stops them dead in their tracks is such....Everyone is operating under the premise that you need to make enough hydrogen on demand to run an internal combustion engine in it's normal mode of operation. By that, I mean a direct replacement of gasoline....that is NOT the case, and has NEVER been. While technically possible, the size of the machine to do so would be impractically large to make it viable in a mobile setting. Even Stan's initial, and most complicated device, The Water Fuel Cell did not do this...and neither did his revised and much simpler injector plugs.

The Water Fuel Cell technology is the most complicated form of the technology and really only desirable for industrial applications where stored hydrogen is needed, and/or the creation of novel magnetized/ionized gasses is desired (more so the Gas Processor)...but I will break-down it's fundamental operation none-the less.

It all comes down to this, "Voltage can do work"...Stan's system essentially turned an electrolysis setup into a capacitor with water as part of the insulator, it uses the fact that water is an insulator, or DI-electric in it's pure form, which means it has equal and oppositely charged atoms making up it's molecule (high dielectric strength), and therefore resists the flow of electrons. The only catch is that water has a low dielectric constant due to the self ionization of water (quantum dynamic of hydrogen ions being delocalized, same phenomena of the "electron cloud" and their location being non-determinate until the very moment of observation...see Quantum "Double slit experiment"). So, just trying to step-charge the Water Fuel Cell with water as dielectric alone, doesn't have very good results as a capacitor. Stan's patents says he overcame this with a custom made stack of alternating carbon/stainless steel resistor. I hypothesized insulating one of the electrodes, which J.L. Naudin did per my recommendations here in 2008, http://jnaudin.free.fr/wfc/index.htm
The results showed true capacitor action with clear as day step charging, and all the scope shots looked absolutely identical to waveforms in Stan's Patent. Naudin was not impressed with the results, noting only small bubbles and low production (he never went on to produce version 2)...instead Naudin went on to pursue new iterations of circuitry four years later with a pancake coil, and the use of purified water. But never came back to a single insulated electrode.

This brings me to the next requirement that MUST be accomplished to do what Stan was actually doing in the Water Fuel Cell....an ELECTRON EXTRACTION CIRCUIT MUST BE IMPLEMENTED, which I have never seen in any redevelopment....the pure capacitor result MUST stretch the water molecule due to polarization, this is not debatable and well established, and that will %100 reduce the strength of the covalent bonding of water and in fact break the bond (but without a place to go, will recombine due to nondeterministic quantum nature of electrons). This is described in Stan's patents, he shows a resonant high voltage waveform, with periodic off time....this off time is called a "gating" signal. The gating signal does two things, shuts off the input pulse, and simultaneously turns on an electrically separate "electron extraction" circuit...remember, there is covalent bond breaking due to the stresses of polarization in the voltage zone of the Water Fuel Cell, BUT....due to the "delocalized" quantum nature of electrons, as soon as the water leaves the voltage zone, or the voltage is turned off, the molecule starts to relax, and electrons redistribute to their normal probabilistic distribution. The Electron Extraction Circuit turning on from the gate pulse, as the resonant step-charge pulse is turned off, overlays a different potential path to strip the electrons during their momentarily stretched and weakened/broken covalent bond state. The light emitting diodes that make up the resistive load of the Electron Extraction Circuit act as a detector and "observe" the electron's position, making the otherwise indeterminate location of the electron, determinate....electron pulled out of water via VOLTAGE, the opposite/inverse of electrons being dislodged by current pushed into the water molecule....the establishment pushing for investors to sue Stan for fraud shortly before his death, was simply because they couldn't tell the difference and only saw electron flow...and he refused to explain the technique in a method people could grasp.

Now, even as Mythbusters showed in their attempt to debunk the movement, using Hydrogen as a direct method of replacing gasoline is not viable...enter Stan's "Gas Processor"...and the creation of "Atomic Hydrogen".
As I said above, a device that operates in the manner just described to produce enough gas to run a internal combustion engine in normal operation is prohibitive to mobile use, due to the surface area/size of such a device. Instead Stan utilized the further energy release that was described by Langmuir's Atomic Hydrogen observations. Difference being, Stan utilized more efficient methods, namely, another voltage zone, an orthogonal magnetic field, the released photons from the Electron Extraction Circuit, and another Electron Extraction Circuit to snap the Hydrogen molecules into singular Hydrogen atoms. This allows the under-powered molecular hydrogen to release atomic hydrogen's impressive (and anomalous) thermal heat and expand the size of the other incombustible gasses in the cylinder to drive the cylinder.

Lastly, the culmination of this technology into a small device the size of a spark plug.....
In Stan's final device, he figured how to get everything to happen at once, in the Water Fuel Plug...it is deceptively simple.
It starts with an efficient means to turn water to steam, he used two identical, non grounded transformers, with their secondaries attaching to overlapping voltage zones to limit current flow, and increase the vibrational excitation of water into steam, then he ionized the entire air intake of the motor, producing large amounts of ozone being loaded into the cylinders, lastly he fed the steam, and some ozone into the voltage zone of the of the plug and hit it with a high voltage, high current blast. The blast dissociated the water molecule into hydrogen/oxygen and the ozone then rips the free electrons away (making atomic hydrogen), and the massive amount of intake ozone somehow prevents the Atomic Hydrogen from re-associating to molecular hydrogen (reverse mechanism of chlorine depletion of Ozone layer?? I'm not sure, haven't analyzed this effect yet)...Creating Stan's "Atomic Nuclei Decay" of Hydrogen, that he said continues in the cylinder until the products are vented in the exhaust phase, and the Hydrogen can grab free electrons from the air/sun....

This is the easiest form of the technology, all it requires is an efficient resonant charging circuit to be able to charge a sufficiently large electrolytic capacitor on demand, then dump the capacitor into a autotransformer with sufficient inductance/mutual inductance, then an intelligent utilization of positive feedback loop(s) (diode) to re-route self-induction and mutual induction to work with the application of the forward discharge pulse, in effect, exponentially accelerating the the change in work and the change in time (Delta Work/Delta Time=Power), producing an exponential rise in energy provided by the speed in which the magnetic field can be created, and also the time in which the Aether can collapse the magnetic field and send the energy forward. Basically it makes self/mutual induction work with, instead of opposed to the application of current/growth of magnetic field, and subsequently the collapse of field/discharge of current as well.

Attached is a simple circuit I made to disprove an erroneous theory of operation MANY years ago (my explanation was oversimplified then, but ultimately correct), it is deceptively simple, but very powerful...increase the input voltage and change the neon to a spark plug of own design....be wary of those who claim to know the "secret" and mystify it...they are either charlatans only interested in exploiting you, or intentionally trying to confuse the truth. The only arguable thing here, is that Aether is the mechanism of magnetic collapse, but the current state of Quantum dynamics is on that verge now, it's about to be accepted as the current model of Quantum Mechanics.

P.S. One more reverse biased diode across the primary would make it even better, re-routing/realigning primary self-inductance, and flyback spike (I made the diagram 14 y/o, captured from energeticforum archives)

My next post will expound on this coil's operation to give everyone an easily understood basis to get you doing amazing things with it (be careful, it has potential to emit high energy radiation...ie, "soft x-rays")...it is a common thread to many OU technologies. "Splitting the Positive"...Gray, Puriarch, Stan, etc....



Online Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4177
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2023, 06:23:39 am »
I’m very interested in your theory! And I agree the system would better fit industrial appliances however I calculated recently that if the water can indeed generate electricity it would be possible to have a car runing with only hydrogen with the expense of at least one third of its output power…

I came up with some calculations using chat gpt that the cavity can be used in a sort of generator mode if hiring at its antiresonant point and provided some geometric forms fields are present so that water will resonant with its sound proprieties causing displacement of the charges in reference to the field generating a voltage that must be consumed in order to generate the gas… feeding back this energy is what make it possible to become overunity since the energy is coming out at same time as hydrogen is generated so it may basically convert kinetic energy into electrically but as the hydrogen is generated backwards as long as the electricity it would suppose to consume there is no voltage drop so basically electric input is not consumed directly… only at diodes and resistances and of course the displacement of water that also may cause heat. Since the generation of hydrogen is endothermic this heat may be absorbed causing the so called cooling effect while operating the cell…

I calculated that and is all well explained in my thread so I hope you can later check to that and tell your point view on that

Basically my understanding is that after creating hydrogen in an effective manner it can be simply used as it is since it can create a cop of at least 9 theoretically or higher so actually an electric vehicle would be better use of it than a combustion engine

Now if later we can ionize and provide more bang to the buck is a second question to answer. I think may be addressed in the same manner of the first…

One thing that come to my mind is making coils big like

8 inch long 2 inch square thick and revisit Meyer theory of amp restriction but having high power applied to that



Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2023, 14:00:29 pm »
Very interesting, such a thing may very well be possible. If you kinetically resonate it with enough amplitude, the molecule would shake apart, I will take some time to look into it more.
Stan's WFC with the electron extraction circuit (the demo model did not have an EEC), moved electrons out of water without pushing others in, so that along with H2 and O2 dissociation gave the cooling effect. If your AI assisted method works, it would be interesting to see if the resonance imparts heat via collision.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4705
    • water structure and science
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2023, 14:41:15 pm »
I've spent a great amount of time analyzing patents, reading theories, and creating my own experiments over the better part of a decade...I'm at the point I believe I can adequately put it all together, I will start this thread to lay out the premise, and document results. (Most of my equipment/experiments were stolen from me in 2010, I am essentially starting over...only archive that really remains is the few videos left on my youtube channel @Zer0pointunlimited )....

Stan created, and patented several iterations of his devices...it is my belief now, that Stan, like so many others, intentionally confused and misled people for a couple of reasons. First, his most complicated device, "The Water Fuel Cell" is a culmination of multiple principles already in public domain at the time he released it. Those being, observations of bipolar dynamics of water and high voltage accumulation of charge pioneered by Lord Kelvin (think of the famous Thunder Storm experiment ran in reverse), phenomena discovered by Nikola Tesla in his Utilization of Radiant Energy patent regarding photons impinged on a capacitor plate through a transparent insulator (Stan's gas processor) and observations Tesla made on the discharge of a condensers(capacitors) into inductors, and lastly, the phenomena of nascent, aka mono-atomic, aka "Atomic" hydrogen, explored by Langmuir.

The hang-up most people quickly come to, that stops them dead in their tracks is such....Everyone is operating under the premise that you need to make enough hydrogen on demand to run an internal combustion engine in it's normal mode of operation. By that, I mean a direct replacement of gasoline....that is NOT the case, and has NEVER been. While technically possible, the size of the machine to do so would be impractically large to make it viable in a mobile setting. Even Stan's initial, and most complicated device, The Water Fuel Cell did not do this...and neither did his revised and much simpler injector plugs.

The Water Fuel Cell technology is the most complicated form of the technology and really only desirable for industrial applications where stored hydrogen is needed, and/or the creation of novel magnetized/ionized gasses is desired (more so the Gas Processor)...but I will break-down it's fundamental operation none-the less.

It all comes down to this, "Voltage can do work"...Stan's system essentially turned an electrolysis setup into a capacitor with water as part of the insulator, it uses the fact that water is an insulator, or DI-electric in it's pure form, which means it has equal and oppositely charged atoms making up it's molecule (high dielectric strength), and therefore resists the flow of electrons. The only catch is that water has a low dielectric constant due to the self ionization of water (quantum dynamic of hydrogen ions being delocalized, same phenomena of the "electron cloud" and their location being non-determinate until the very moment of observation...see Quantum "Double slit experiment"). So, just trying to step-charge the Water Fuel Cell with water as dielectric alone, doesn't have very good results as a capacitor. Stan's patents says he overcame this with a custom made stack of alternating carbon/stainless steel resistor. I hypothesized insulating one of the electrodes, which J.L. Naudin did per my recommendations here in 2008, http://jnaudin.free.fr/wfc/index.htm
The results showed true capacitor action with clear as day step charging, and all the scope shots looked absolutely identical to waveforms in Stan's Patent. Naudin was not impressed with the results, noting only small bubbles and low production (he never went on to produce version 2)...instead Naudin went on to pursue new iterations of circuitry four years later with a pancake coil, and the use of purified water. But never came back to a single insulated electrode.

This brings me to the next requirement that MUST be accomplished to do what Stan was actually doing in the Water Fuel Cell....an ELECTRON EXTRACTION CIRCUIT MUST BE IMPLEMENTED, which I have never seen in any redevelopment....the pure capacitor result MUST stretch the water molecule due to polarization, this is not debatable and well established, and that will %100 reduce the strength of the covalent bonding of water and in fact break the bond (but without a place to go, will recombine due to nondeterministic quantum nature of electrons). This is described in Stan's patents, he shows a resonant high voltage waveform, with periodic off time....this off time is called a "gating" signal. The gating signal does two things, shuts off the input pulse, and simultaneously turns on an electrically separate "electron extraction" circuit...remember, there is covalent bond breaking due to the stresses of polarization in the voltage zone of the Water Fuel Cell, BUT....due to the "delocalized" quantum nature of electrons, as soon as the water leaves the voltage zone, or the voltage is turned off, the molecule starts to relax, and electrons redistribute to their normal probabilistic distribution. The Electron Extraction Circuit turning on from the gate pulse, as the resonant step-charge pulse is turned off, overlays a different potential path to strip the electrons during their momentarily stretched and weakened/broken covalent bond state. The light emitting diodes that make up the resistive load of the Electron Extraction Circuit act as a detector and "observe" the electron's position, making the otherwise indeterminate location of the electron, determinate....electron pulled out of water via VOLTAGE, the opposite/inverse of electrons being dislodged by current pushed into the water molecule....the establishment pushing for investors to sue Stan for fraud shortly before his death, was simply because they couldn't tell the difference and only saw electron flow...and he refused to explain the technique in a method people could grasp.

Now, even as Mythbusters showed in their attempt to debunk the movement, using Hydrogen as a direct method of replacing gasoline is not viable...enter Stan's "Gas Processor"...and the creation of "Atomic Hydrogen".
As I said above, a device that operates in the manner just described to produce enough gas to run a internal combustion engine in normal operation is prohibitive to mobile use, due to the surface area/size of such a device. Instead Stan utilized the further energy release that was described by Langmuir's Atomic Hydrogen observations. Difference being, Stan utilized more efficient methods, namely, another voltage zone, an orthogonal magnetic field, the released photons from the Electron Extraction Circuit, and another Electron Extraction Circuit to snap the Hydrogen molecules into singular Hydrogen atoms. This allows the under-powered molecular hydrogen to release atomic hydrogen's impressive (and anomalous) thermal heat and expand the size of the other incombustible gasses in the cylinder to drive the cylinder.

Lastly, the culmination of this technology into a small device the size of a spark plug.....
In Stan's final device, he figured how to get everything to happen at once, in the Water Fuel Plug...it is deceptively simple.
It starts with an efficient means to turn water to steam, he used two identical, non grounded transformers, with their secondaries attaching to overlapping voltage zones to limit current flow, and increase the vibrational excitation of water into steam, then he ionized the entire air intake of the motor, producing large amounts of ozone being loaded into the cylinders, lastly he fed the steam, and some ozone into the voltage zone of the of the plug and hit it with a high voltage, high current blast. The blast dissociated the water molecule into hydrogen/oxygen and the ozone then rips the free electrons away (making atomic hydrogen), and the massive amount of intake ozone somehow prevents the Atomic Hydrogen from re-associating to molecular hydrogen (reverse mechanism of chlorine depletion of Ozone layer?? I'm not sure, haven't analyzed this effect yet)...Creating Stan's "Atomic Nuclei Decay" of Hydrogen, that he said continues in the cylinder until the products are vented in the exhaust phase, and the Hydrogen can grab free electrons from the air/sun....

This is the easiest form of the technology, all it requires is an efficient resonant charging circuit to be able to charge a sufficiently large electrolytic capacitor on demand, then dump the capacitor into a autotransformer with sufficient inductance/mutual inductance, then an intelligent utilization of positive feedback loop(s) (diode) to re-route self-induction and mutual induction to work with the application of the forward discharge pulse, in effect, exponentially accelerating the the change in work and the change in time (Delta Work/Delta Time=Power), producing an exponential rise in energy provided by the speed in which the magnetic field can be created, and also the time in which the Aether can collapse the magnetic field and send the energy forward. Basically it makes self/mutual induction work with, instead of opposed to the application of current/growth of magnetic field, and subsequently the collapse of field/discharge of current as well.

Attached is a simple circuit I made to disprove an erroneous theory of operation MANY years ago (my explanation was oversimplified then, but ultimately correct), it is deceptively simple, but very powerful...increase the input voltage and change the neon to a spark plug of own design....be wary of those who claim to know the "secret" and mystify it...they are either charlatans only interested in exploiting you, or intentionally trying to confuse the truth. The only arguable thing here, is that Aether is the mechanism of magnetic collapse, but the current state of Quantum dynamics is on that verge now, it's about to be accepted as the current model of Quantum Mechanics.

P.S. One more reverse biased diode across the primary would make it even better, re-routing/realigning primary self-inductance, and flyback spike (I made the diagram 14 y/o, captured from energeticforum archives)

My next post will expound on this coil's operation to give everyone an easily understood basis to get you doing amazing things with it (be careful, it has potential to emit high energy radiation...ie, "soft x-rays")...it is a common thread to many OU technologies. "Splitting the Positive"...Gray, Puriarch, Stan, etc....

Nice and well written Radiant!
I also believe in the EEC.
Looking forward to your next explanation  :)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2023, 16:34:36 pm »
Expanding on the importance of self/mutual inductance and how to manipulate it.

Making self/mutual-inductance work in phase with applied primary current, accelerating the change in work, and compressing the time scale, amplifying total power delivered (step-up transformer)

Take for instance again the attached simple circuit. I have no video at the moment, but, if you build it, you will see. Without the diode from the LV+ to HV lead, you will see both electrodes light up, with the bottom neon electrode being brighter. If you add the diode string, you will see only the bottom electrode light up MUCH brighter.

Without the diodes, the forward current of the primary, through mutual-induction creates a reversed flow in the secondary, and the the HV lead is HV- on forward induction and the top neon terminal lights up (current flows from + towards -, the HV- lights up because Voltage flows - towards + ), then the current stops flowing, and the magnetic field collapses much faster than the forward field grew, ("flyback always collapses faster), this collapse reverses the voltages, and the change in work happening over a shorter time increases voltage (Delta Work/Delta Time) making the bottom neon electrode glow brighter.

Now adding the diode...
Normally, as the primary current flows, the mutual-induced current in the secondary opposes the current flow in the primary and creates an opposing reversed magnetic field that fights the magnetic field being created in the primary, by adding the diode string with negative polarity facing the HV lead....this reversed mutual-induced HV- current shorts out through the diodes, as such the opposing induced current in the secondary is allowed to flow out of the secondary, this also removes the opposing induced magnetic field in the Flux core. So this first step, neutralizes the opposition of mutual-inductance.
At the exact same time, the rerouting of this current out of the inductor of the secondary, creates its own reversed self/mutual inductance in opposition to itself, into the secondary, along with a magnetic field also opposed to itself, this self/mutual inductance of a self/mutual induced current is now IN PHASE WITH the primary current/magnetic field (opposite of an opposition), and pulls the primary magnetic field into the core faster, and in turn, pulls the current in faster, which in turns increases the induced current/field speed, etc, etc....in essence, it creates a positve feedback loop, exponentially accelerating the speed which current/voltage is distrubuted across both primary and secondary coils (both coils are energized).
Once the capacitor/pulse is empty/off, the voltage across the primary reverses (see RLC circuits) matching secondary polarity (there is also a possibility the primary current(s) are pulled into the feedback loop as the HV- potential rises, as they would be HV+ biased regardless of their LV bias).
The diode shuts off, and the magnetic field starts to collapse, being as there is no opposed current/field in the coils, or in the iron core, the "Flyback" occurs faster than normal, and the voltage flips and increases many factors higher, and all power is sent forward across neon/gap. None of the power was lost (besides losses due to resitance), and it was in fact, amplified beyond initial input. Aetheric inpouring was allowed to occur by destabilizing/reorienting self/mutual-inductions that would normally balance/oppose forward applied current and magnetic field propagation/collapse. (I suspect self/mutual-induced counter currents/EM fields arise from aetheric polarization)
« Last Edit: June 19, 2023, 17:28:10 pm by Radiant_1 »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 44
    • The Legacy Of Stan Meyer
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2023, 01:58:56 am »
Expanding on the importance of self/mutual inductance and how to manipulate it.

Making self/mutual-inductance work in phase with applied primary current, accelerating the change in work, and compressing the time scale, amplifying total power delivered (step-up transformer)

Take for instance again the attached simple circuit. I have no video at the moment, but, if you build it, you will see. Without the diode from the LV+ to HV lead, you will see both electrodes light up, with the bottom neon electrode being brighter. If you add the diode string, you will see only the bottom electrode light up MUCH brighter.

Without the diodes, the forward current of the primary, through mutual-induction creates a reversed flow in the secondary, and the the HV lead is HV- on forward induction and the top neon terminal lights up (current flows from + towards -, the HV- lights up because Voltage flows - towards + ), then the current stops flowing, and the magnetic field collapses much faster than the forward field grew, ("flyback always collapses faster), this collapse reverses the voltages, and the change in work happening over a shorter time increases voltage (Delta Work/Delta Time) making the bottom neon electrode glow brighter.

Now adding the diode...
Normally, as the primary current flows, the mutual-induced current in the secondary opposes the current flow in the primary and creates an opposing reversed magnetic field that fights the magnetic field being created in the primary, by adding the diode string with negative polarity facing the HV lead....this reversed mutual-induced HV- current shorts out through the diodes, as such the opposing induced current in the secondary is allowed to flow out of the secondary, this also removes the opposing induced magnetic field in the Flux core. So this first step, neutralizes the opposition of mutual-inductance.
At the exact same time, the rerouting of this current out of the inductor of the secondary, creates its own reversed self/mutual inductance in opposition to itself, into the secondary, along with a magnetic field also opposed to itself, this self/mutual inductance of a self/mutual induced current is now IN PHASE WITH the primary current/magnetic field (opposite of an opposition), and pulls the primary magnetic field into the core faster, and in turn, pulls the current in faster, which in turns increases the induced current/field speed, etc, etc....in essence, it creates a positve feedback loop, exponentially accelerating the speed which current/voltage is distrubuted across both primary and secondary coils (both coils are energized).
Once the capacitor/pulse is empty/off, the voltage across the primary reverses (see RLC circuits) matching secondary polarity (there is also a possibility the primary current(s) are pulled into the feedback loop as the HV- potential rises, as they would be HV+ biased regardless of their LV bias).
The diode shuts off, and the magnetic field starts to collapse, being as there is no opposed current/field in the coils, or in the iron core, the "Flyback" occurs faster than normal, and the voltage flips and increases many factors higher, and all power is sent forward across neon/gap. None of the power was lost (besides losses due to resitance), and it was in fact, amplified beyond initial input. Aetheric inpouring was allowed to occur by destabilizing/reorienting self/mutual-inductions that would normally balance/oppose forward applied current and magnetic field propagation/collapse. (I suspect self/mutual-induced counter currents/EM fields arise from aetheric polarization)

Reminds me of another circuit. Diodes help to prevent reversal, and support redirection. Harvesting backEMF nets another step.  But, there's always a headroom ceiling you can attenuate within. 
« Last Edit: June 20, 2023, 02:16:32 am by Chris Bake »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2023, 05:07:47 am »


Reminds me of another circuit. Diodes help to prevent reversal, and support redirection. Harvesting backEMF nets another step.  But, there's always a headroom ceiling you can attenuate within. 

But that's not what's going on here at all...the diode string reroutes or short circuits the reversed mutual-induction forward pulse of the secondary caused by the rise of charge and growth of the EMF of the weaker initial discharge into the primary. It's starts a chain-reaction positive feedback loop of accelerating the input charge across the primary which is normally slowed from the opposing counter-EMFs of self/mutual induction. Rerouting the this initial counter-EMF from mutual-induction caused by the time-on, has the effect of not only removing the counter-EMF, but it creates it's own self-induced and mutual-induced counter-EMF against itself, which are both working WITH the primary's EMF. As that happens, they all accelerate each other exponentially...

Easily got ChatGPT to do a thought experiment..

https://poe.com/s/fWGwferekLEqSBqVESky


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Stanley Meyer demystified
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2023, 14:41:07 pm »
I've been busy with the family lately (catching up on yard work, installing a pool, and quality time)..., but I've gotten a pair of ignition coils, 40khz piezo transducers, an ozone generator with water bubbler, 6lbs of citric acid, and a 405nm laser delivered. Waiting on 40 3w 410nm LEDs to be delivered (highest energy absorbtion spectrum of hydrogen(Stan's red LEDs were the lowest energy absorbtion spectrum).
But in the meantime I've started developing a compliment-gated CD4047b frequency generator and I'm fabricating a 19-tubeset Cell, along with a few test cells with a tighter .91mm gap (gap distance for the acoustic 4th harmonic of 10khz (40khz)).
I've also had some more productive talks with ChatGPT about a hypothetical "water capacitor", effect of insulating the postive, how water would still be part of the dielectric, polarization, photoelectric effect, momentary ionization, temporary solvated electrons, orthagonal magnetic field effect on ions and moving electrons, the inverse of classic electrolysis, behavior of sound and voltage wave propagation in concentric tubes, resonant pulsed DC charging circuits, charging chokes, and even a lil argument about String theory being essentially rebranded
Aether theory...lol
ChatGPT is becoming quite the valuable tool. It helped me calculate the .91mm annular gap being a 4th harmonic of 10khz waveguide for 40khz ultrasound through 20c water, and how to tune resistance and inductance experimentally to make the RLC circuit also resonate electrically at 40khz.

I've also been reading alot of recent research papers on the current state of "the art", specifically ultrasonic electrolysis, chromium and nickel catalysts, plasma electrolysis, electron and proton tunneling, and something that really clicked with photoelectric effect, and subsequent "soft x-ray" emmision... Looking at you Herman P. Anderson (RIP), and your Hydrogen isotope "radiolysis" water plugs...oh and ozone absorbtion in water, and NO3 scavenging of solvated electrons from Water, wondering why it's always NO3, and not O3...think it's probably because O3 decomposes to NO2 and NO3, and hydroxyl radicals relative quickly (1hr at most on cold water)

I'm also finishing up a scratch built 3d printer on linear rails, it has dual steppers on every axis to create torque for the heavy y-axis 5/16" forged aluminum bed, and high-speed/balance and precision for the x-axis...the z-axis has really nice anti-backlash nuts, should be really nice to help rapid prototyping. Just have to trim the bed a little, cut /drill the steel flatstock to mount the bed to the bearing blocks, and mount the solid state relay to drive the bed from mains 120vac. My old modified robo3D R1+ is getting tired, and I'm tired of the z-artifacts from the cheap "floating" gantry....So, I'm quite busy lately, but I'm chugging along..."I'll be back" 😅🫡