Author Topic: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory  (Read 47575 times)

0 Members and 43 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 121
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp7oJf9m5gRPBi5PFhtsK_w
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #64 on: June 21, 2025, 10:02:47 am »
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)

Online Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 292
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #65 on: June 21, 2025, 12:19:41 pm »
Its a lot easier to talk about it than do some research.

This boards are full of "theorists" but nobody risk anymore to try, experiment, research and do their homework.

"this works like this" oh... no ... "like this..."

Some people came to a conclusion that it simply doesn´t work at all....

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 121
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp7oJf9m5gRPBi5PFhtsK_w
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #66 on: June 21, 2025, 16:19:16 pm »
Its a lot easier to talk about it than do some research.

This boards are full of "theorists" but nobody risk anymore to try, experiment, research and do their homework.

"this works like this" oh... no ... "like this..."

Some people came to a conclusion that it simply doesn´t work at all....

Do not be a grumpy, forever unsuccessful old man.
I have a full of both theoretical and experimental work on my channel.
I do not know English and do all the work in Russian.
Now I translate my videos using AI into English.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4780
    • water structure and science
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #67 on: June 21, 2025, 19:00:24 pm »

I think i read that Meyer said that if you would see a higher voltage on the cell, then the output voltage of the vic transformer, that you are doing what he was doing....
Ramping voltage up
Think about that...


So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)

Online Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 292
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #68 on: June 22, 2025, 13:19:37 pm »
Quote
Do not be a grumpy, forever unsuccessful old man.
I have a full of both theoretical and experimental work on my channel.
I do not know English and do all the work in Russian.
Now I translate my videos using AI into English.

First of all, im not a grumpy or "old unsucessful man", im in my 30's.
All you are digging and scraping about Meyer technology was already discussed, examinated, experimented by all of this great people on ionizationx and other foruns, with almost no result.
People got very frustrated about it, so do I.
Even people like Dynodon had the chance of trying the original Stans Vic and coils and nothing seems to work as Stan claimed.
The theory of the high voltage in the cell, the resonance LC and   the huge amount of gas production (7 lpm on 9 tube demo cell) was already debunked. 
Just want to save you some time and frustration, but i really appreciate you still on research after knowing all of what had been done and tested.
Cheers.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4780
    • water structure and science
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #69 on: June 23, 2025, 13:19:57 pm »
as Bob Boyce explained and also Stan tried to say, is that the trick is to get the right type of gas out of the water.
The right gas is 4 times more powerfull and because of that, you need 4x less of it.......


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #70 on: June 28, 2025, 16:45:57 pm »
If the voltage rises, current rises as we are dealing with something that has no phase lag between current and voltage...

So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #71 on: June 28, 2025, 18:10:07 pm »
I dont think that is possible having high voltage in the cell without high current. No phase lag between them, its a resistor.


I think i read that Meyer said that if you would see a higher voltage on the cell, then the output voltage of the vic transformer, that you are doing what he was doing....
Ramping voltage up
Think about that...


So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

The frequency is needed to catch the resonance on the condenser (fuel cell). This leads to an increase in voltage.
There is a rupture of the molecules (dielectric), the number of charges (current strength) instantly increases. You must be removed from the system so that indestructible molecules (dielectrics) come in.
Thus, while the amplitude grows (molecules stretch) Dielectric water. When the molecule is destroyed (the dielectric is destroyed) high conductivity (current strength) appears. The charge carriers must be removed from the system (electron extraction scheme)