Author Topic: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory  (Read 17585 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp7oJf9m5gRPBi5PFhtsK_w
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #56 on: June 13, 2025, 06:08:17 am »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp7oJf9m5gRPBi5PFhtsK_w
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #57 on: June 13, 2025, 06:18:01 am »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4769
    • water structure and science

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4769
    • water structure and science
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #59 on: June 19, 2025, 12:45:56 pm »
The question is then how short the pulses should, when you pulse at 5khz?
And does the frequency has any meaning at all, except for the pulse duration?


Regards
Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #60 on: June 20, 2025, 15:01:48 pm »
So far, no one managed to increase the voltage at the cell without increasing the current. The cell is a resistor, more voltage = more amps. Its not about physics or theory, its about engineering to build a circuit capable to do this... And coating at the tubes does not work... The whole purpose of this is use water as dielectric and charge it with high voltage. If you coat the tubes you are not going to charge the water, you are going to charge this white coating, destroying all the purpose of stans work.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4769
    • water structure and science
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #61 on: June 20, 2025, 17:39:27 pm »
i agree with the resistance Ampere explanation.
However, i do think that the Meyer trick is to cut off the current flow when it exceets a certain amount of current....


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #62 on: June 20, 2025, 17:54:52 pm »
i agree with the resistance Ampere explanation.
However, i do think that the Meyer trick is to cut off the current flow when it exceets a certain amount of current....

Now we have another problem, as the cell behaves like a resistor, voltage and current are always in phase... So, high voltage = high amps, instantaneously. There is no brief time where we have voltage without current. No one managed to apply an lagged signal at the cell either... I've done this measurement many times. If you want to check it by yourself, use an non inductive resistor to measure current with an oscilloscope... The current will ALWAYS be in phase with voltage. The only way to have voltage without current in the cell is to keep voltage below the electrolysis threshold, below 2,7V roughly.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp7oJf9m5gRPBi5PFhtsK_w
Re: Stanley Meyer's fuel cell theory
« Reply #63 on: June 21, 2025, 09:54:52 am »
How many people and opinions