Author Topic: My new approach  (Read 108185 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4215
Re: My new approach
« Reply #552 on: June 27, 2024, 07:39:17 am »
10 years ago Ronnie and team was into talking about coils start and coil end and how they think it could be

The whole idea is that it makes simple to explain

The coils have an start and an end if they are all wound in same direction the start or ends can take the dot convention for polarity

So the first coil former has the dot on the start of the coils

This secondaries are connected in series with secondaries on the other side of the core but this have the dot on the ends of the coils… so this coil is flíped

I made this to reduce the noise

So the great way to simplify is that the ends of the coils are connected together and starts or the coils too

If you clean the drawing and look at it you will see this is same as puharich patented

So Meyer patent is a improvement to it

Probably also he drank from the Stephen horvath patents too as he was very well aware of it

So all this to say that I don’t have a clue how the heck I get such ac voltage on water if there is not any path to give ac to it except from the capacitive coupling between the resonant coils

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4738
    • water structure and science
Re: My new approach
« Reply #553 on: June 27, 2024, 09:00:44 am »
Yeah...Ronnie. Where did he go with his bs?
It was probably nothing, as nobody ever heard from him or from his so called friends.
The only wise thing he ever said was that the characteristics of a wfc change as soon as it produces gas.
Bohaaaaa.
A little child could tell you that is air or gas is between conductors, resistance goes high.
The theory was to produce gas first and then raise the voltage, as amps are reduced because of the gas wall.

All those people would said that they figured it out are all silence. What does that tell you?
If somebody would have figured it out, he at least would have made a video, him dancing around his wfc  ;)

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4738
    • water structure and science
Re: My new approach
« Reply #554 on: June 27, 2024, 09:11:48 am »

Probably also he drank from the Stephen horvath patents too as he was very well aware of it
So all this to say that I don’t have a clue how the heck I get such ac voltage on water if there is not any path to give ac to it except from the capacitive coupling between the resonant coils

Stan was very very very aware of Horvaths patents.
The setup of Horvath is also very good. Pulsing high current / voltage pulses into the wfc is a way to go.
You need the higher voltage, like Stan wrote in many of his schematics. But not as high as many think in some of Stans setups.
Most of the time, the highest was like 100v
That makes sense, as with 100v pulses, you will get a high amp reaction. U=IxR
And when the Amps flow, the pulse is terminated. And that he repeated.
Raise voltage, Amps start to flow, cut the power, pause, repeate
Exactly as Horvath described.
So Stan called it that Voltage is taking over. Yeah, a 90 degree, or 180 degree phase difference, created with coils and capacitor.

It is just getting wierd when Stan started to explain that the cut off pulses were keep on going till the where finished, after cutting the power to the primary coil. ::) :P :-\ ??? :o
There he was seeing a fenomenon that others also have seen, like Bob Boyce, or the TPU boys.
Mother nature seems to finishe off a very short pulse with energy from around us.

cheers my friend. You Lab looks amazing!






Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4215
Re: My new approach
« Reply #555 on: June 27, 2024, 09:26:02 am »
Thanks a lot for the reply  ;)

I’m curious too about that statement my best guess is that as water generate electricity in the process and that the cavity can have a quality factor up to 1000 000 is safe to think that the accumulated energy in the cavity will keep it runing probably until it loose tune or the energy finish.

If I remember well Stan say like 90 seconds would keep generating gas after shut off power

What I mean is that the water may behave like a flywheel in the circuit where energy is acumulares in the cavity in the form of vibrations and is so much that it may keep generating provided the required fields are present

If the electric power generated on water exceed the input power it can even self sustain oscillate  coiuld be arranged


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4215
Re: My new approach
« Reply #556 on: June 27, 2024, 13:53:33 pm »
Yeah...Ronnie. Where did he go with his bs?
It was probably nothing, as nobody ever heard from him or from his so called friends.
The only wise thing he ever said was that the characteristics of a wfc change as soon as it produces gas.
Bohaaaaa.
A little child could tell you that is air or gas is between conductors, resistance goes high.
The theory was to produce gas first and then raise the voltage, as amps are reduced because of the gas wall.

All those people would said that they figured it out are all silence. What does that tell you?
If somebody would have figured it out, he at least would have made a video, him dancing around his wfc  ;)


I think this project can easily bring paranoid  and greed ideas to someone specially when you are used to listen to everyone’s paranoia.. I believe that could prevent most from showing what they found something

This is why I decided to write the theory before testing so it’s already out there and would not make any sense someone try to make me out of business

If they try again they will have a very special surprise already prepared to them!

When I have strange thoughts I just go there and create something really evil as response to calm it

Life is on my side also for sure!

Another reason is megalomaniac thought that impede people to even sometimes appreciate others ideas and make them think they are going to earn alone that’s totally stupid

I even think Stan made this big mistake not releasing any product ready on the market whatever it was…

Another good reason for me not disappearing is that i made so much noise that you all will notice it and will make everyone sure that I already released the info!

So I’m going to make the dance video for sure haha

I was hoping it get viral on YouTube so I can earn some money to help bring it to the people

As I pointed recently hydrogen is indeed dangerous and people can get really hurt if don’t know what to do

Resuming by spreading the competition is the way to get the tech out safely










« Last Edit: June 27, 2024, 14:26:22 pm by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4215
Re: My new approach
« Reply #557 on: June 27, 2024, 14:35:22 pm »
I was thinking if we could open a wormhole to the same space we are going to be looking into the past so may be possible to see at least ancient history and civilizations

The difference in time will be proportional to the length of the wormhole and the speed we cross it


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4215
Re: My new approach
« Reply #558 on: June 27, 2024, 14:41:31 pm »
Creating a wormhole, a hypothetical passage through spacetime that could create shortcuts for long journeys across the universe, is currently beyond our technological and scientific capabilities. The concept of wormholes comes from solutions to the equations of general relativity, but there are significant theoretical and practical challenges that make their creation highly speculative.

### Theoretical Background
1. **Einstein-Rosen Bridge**: The first theoretical model of a wormhole was proposed by Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen in 1935, known as the Einstein-Rosen bridge. It connects two separate points in spacetime, but these connections are unstable and collapse too quickly for anything to pass through.
   
2. **Traversable Wormholes**: Later, physicist Kip Thorne and his colleagues proposed the concept of a traversable wormhole, which would be stable enough for matter to travel through. This would require:
   - **Exotic Matter**: Matter with negative energy density and pressure, violating known energy conditions. Such exotic matter has not been observed in nature, and its existence remains purely theoretical.

### Challenges
1. **Energy Requirements**: The amount of exotic matter or negative energy required to stabilize a wormhole would be immense, potentially greater than the energy contained in entire stars or galaxies.
   
2. **Stability**: Wormholes, if they exist, might be prone to collapse upon the slightest perturbation, making them impractical for travel.
   
3. **Causality Violations**: Wormholes could lead to paradoxes, such as closed timelike curves, where cause and effect could become looped, violating causality principles.

### Current Scientific Status
1. **Theoretical Studies**: Researchers continue to study the mathematics of wormholes, often using concepts from quantum field theory, general relativity, and string theory.
   
2. **Negative Energy**: Experiments involving the Casimir effect have demonstrated negative energy densities on a small scale, but harnessing and scaling this up to the level required for a wormhole is far from current capabilities.

3. **Quantum Gravity**: Understanding and unifying general relativity with quantum mechanics might provide new insights into the nature of spacetime and the potential for wormholes.

### Popular Culture vs. Reality
Wormholes are a popular concept in science fiction, often depicted as stable, traversable tunnels that allow for instant travel across vast distances. However, these depictions are purely speculative and not grounded in our current understanding of physics.

### Conclusion
While the idea of creating a wormhole is fascinating and serves as an intriguing topic for theoretical physics and science fiction, it remains firmly in the realm of speculation. The theoretical and practical challenges are immense, and there is no known method to create or stabilize a wormhole with our current technology and understanding of the universe.

In summary, making a wormhole is an exciting concept but one that is far beyond our current scientific and technological reach. Researchers continue to explore the fundamental properties of spacetime, which might one day shed light on whether wormholes could be feasible.

The concept of using a wormhole to travel through time, as well as space, is a fascinating but highly theoretical idea. If a wormhole could be created and manipulated to connect two points in spacetime, the time travel aspect would depend on several variables. Here's a breakdown of the factors involved:

### Key Variables
1. **Wormhole Length (Spatial Distance)**: The spatial distance between the two mouths of the wormhole in our universe.
2. **Relative Motion**: The relative velocities of the two wormhole mouths. If one mouth moves relative to the other, time dilation effects (from special relativity) come into play.
3. **Gravitational Fields**: The strength and configuration of gravitational fields near each mouth. Strong gravitational fields can cause significant time dilation (from general relativity).
4. **Synchronization**: How the clocks at each mouth are synchronized at the time the wormhole is created.

### Example Scenario: Stationary Wormhole
If you open a wormhole between two points in space (let’s call them Mouth A and Mouth B) that are stationary relative to each other and in the same gravitational field, then:
- **Length**: The spatial distance through the wormhole.
- **Travel Time**: In this simplified scenario, if the wormhole is traversable instantly (or nearly instantly), the traveler would experience negligible time difference when moving through the wormhole. There would be no significant time travel effect.

### Example Scenario: Moving Mouths (Time Travel)
If Mouth A is stationary and Mouth B is moved at a high velocity relative to Mouth A, relativistic effects cause time dilation:
1. **Relative Velocity (v)**: Mouth B moves at a significant fraction of the speed of light (c). The faster it moves, the greater the time dilation effect.
2. **Duration of Motion (t)**: The duration for which Mouth B moves at this velocity. Longer durations result in more significant time dilation.

#### Calculation using Special Relativity
To understand the time difference, you can use the time dilation formula from special relativity:
\[ t' = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \]
where \( t \) is the proper time experienced by the stationary mouth, \( v \) is the velocity of the moving mouth, and \( c \) is the speed of light.

### Combining Special and General Relativity
In more complex scenarios involving significant gravitational fields:
- **Gravitational Time Dilation**: Near a strong gravitational source (like a black hole), time moves slower. This effect can be calculated using general relativity principles.

### Time Travel Outcome
When the moving mouth (Mouth B) returns to its initial position near Mouth A:
- **Future Travel**: If you travel through the wormhole from Mouth A to Mouth B, and Mouth B has experienced less time due to high velocity, you effectively travel into the future of Mouth A's frame.
- **Past Travel**: Conversely, if you travel from Mouth B back to Mouth A, you would appear in Mouth A’s past relative to Mouth B’s experienced time.

### Example with Numbers
Assume Mouth B moves at 0.8c (80% of the speed of light) for 10 years (in Mouth A’s frame):
\[ t' = \frac{10 \text{ years}}{\sqrt{1 - 0.8^2}} \approx 16.67 \text{ years} \]
So, if you traverse the wormhole from A to B after 10 years, you’d arrive at B 16.67 years in the future relative to A’s time frame. If you go back through the wormhole, you would appear 6.67 years into A’s past relative to B’s time.

### Summary
The time travel effect using a wormhole depends on:
- The relative velocity of the wormhole mouths.
- The gravitational fields around the wormhole mouths.
- The duration for which the relative motion or gravitational influence is applied.

This scenario remains hypothetical and speculative, as creating and manipulating wormholes, as well as managing the necessary exotic matter and energies, is far beyond current scientific capabilities.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4215
Re: My new approach
« Reply #559 on: June 28, 2024, 00:13:39 am »
Intense day of testing today

Seems water resistance dropped a little may be because the superglue is being scraped out from the electrodes by the hot water and improving electrode area not glued over this glue was needed to make the helical separator

The water seem to heat a lot while the power in it seem really small

At 180khz I found the resistance can reach much higher levels like 30kohm

But don’t generate any much gas

I’m getting now much more gas at lower like 10,5khz

It seem this is actually hiring the resonance from  higher frequency because at 100khz there is a resonance and at 189 stat to rise again but my pll is limited to that

I think this is strange as they should resonate at calculated 10khz

This other resonance could be the self resonance of the dual  foil capacitor that is  built into the cell coil assembly bellow the secondary that is stil not connected by the way

First I wanted to find what would only this part of the system work

Got some very strong zapings from messing around with coil and variable resistor and cavity length

Didnt noticed any change at all on waveform changing the length of the cavity for now

Ah and talking about the characteristics of the bubbles it’s just like a very milk behavior very tiny and seems some are charged because they form a big bubble and attach to the acrylic and can’t go up

Is just rain water