Author Topic: Back to Basics  (Read 28035 times)

Login to see usernames and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #128 on: October 31, 2024, 14:27:01 pm »
Just an example.

To set a constant current of 1 mA with an LM317, you can configure it as a constant current source by placing a resistor between its output (OUT) and adjust (ADJ) pins. This configuration uses the LM317's characteristic that it maintains a 1.25V voltage drop between the output and adjust terminals.

Steps to Set Up a 1 mA Constant Current Source

1. Choose the Resistor: To set the current, use the formula:



I = \frac{1.25V}{R}

Rearranging for , we get:

R = \frac{1.25V}{I} = \frac{1.25V}{0.001A} = 1250\ \Omega

So, a 1.25 kΩ resistor will give you 1 mA of constant current.

2. Wiring:

Connect one end of the 1.25 kΩ resistor to the output (OUT) pin.

Connect the other end of the resistor to the adjust (ADJ) pin.

The ADJ pin will then connect to your load.

The input (IN) pin is connected to your input voltage source (ensure it is higher than the combined load voltage and 1.25V for proper operation).



3. Input Voltage Requirements:

Ensure your input voltage is at least 3V above the load voltage to give the LM317 sufficient headroom to regulate.




Example Setup

Suppose you have a 12V input and a load that varies in resistance. With this setup, the LM317 will regulate the current flowing through the load to 1 mA, regardless of the load’s resistance (as long as the LM317 has enough input voltage to supply 1.25V across the resistor and the load’s voltage drop).

Circuit Diagram

Here's a basic representation:

IN pin: Connected to your input voltage (e.g., 12V).

OUT pin: Connected to one side of the 1.25 kΩ resistor.

The other side of the 1.25 kΩ resistor connects to the ADJ pin.

ADJ pin: Connects to the positive terminal of your load.

The negative terminal of the load connects to ground.


This configuration will create a steady 1 mA current through your load, independent of input voltage fluctuations.


Online Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #129 on: November 01, 2024, 02:07:27 am »
Guys.  I wonder if we are going about this whole thing all wrong.

The goal is "voltrolysis" right?  Build up voltage, and have virtually no current right?

Look at the LM317.  It is designed to limit current OR voltage.  Not both.  To limit current, it dynamically adjusts input voltage as needed.

Here is what we are looking for!!

We don't care how much input voltage is being applied to the VIC transfomer.  We should care about the input current.  Look at this:
Quote
To avoid electrolysis in water even with a high voltage across a small gap, the current density and power dissipation in the water must be kept low enough to prevent the decomposition of water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen.

Here’s a breakdown of the factors:

1. Threshold for Electrolysis
Electrolysis typically begins around 1.23V across the electrodes. Applying 1kV across a 1 mm gap would generate a very strong electric field (1 million volts per meter) that could easily ionize the water if enough current flows. However, electrolysis also depends on current density, so if the current is kept extremely low, it might be possible to avoid significant electrolysis.

2. Dielectric Breakdown and Current Density
At 1kV over 1 mm, water is likely near or past its dielectric breakdown, where it begins to conduct electricity even as a dielectric. At this voltage level, even with minimal current, the strong field may encourage some ionization, so complete avoidance of electrolysis becomes difficult.

3. Estimating Safe Current
To roughly estimate, electrolysis can be minimized if the current density is kept below 0.1 mA/cm² or lower. For a tiny gap like 1 mm, with electrodes in close proximity, you'd ideally want to stay in the microamp range (e.g., 1–10 µA) to minimize ionization effects.

Summary
In practical terms:

Limit current to microamps (µA) at most.
Even with very low current, at 1kV across 1 mm, water will likely experience some ionization due to the strong electric field.
In summary, keeping current below a few microamps might reduce electrolysis effects, but with such a high electric field, some ionization and possible electrolysis could still occur.
Our objective is to achieve "voltrolysis"—building up a high voltage with minimal current across a water gap to avoid electrolysis. Here’s the strategy:

Current Limiting with LM317: The LM317 voltage regulator can be set to maintain a constant current output by dynamically adjusting the output voltage. By applying a high input voltage to the LM317, we can define the output current precisely, allowing the LM317 to handle any required voltage adjustments automatically.

Focus on Input Current for the VIC Transformer: Instead of managing the input voltage to the VIC transformer, we should focus on controlling the input current. With the LM317 set to limit current, we can establish the desired electric field across the water cell without exceeding the electrolysis threshold.

Resonance Tuning: By operating the VIC transformer at resonance, the circuit will naturally adjust the voltage to maintain the specified input current. Resonance will maximize the voltage across the water cell, helping achieve the high field strength needed to approach avalanche breakdown across the water gap without significant current flow.

By combining current limiting, high voltage, and resonance, this approach enables precise control over the electric field across the water, which prevents electrolysis by ensuring minimal current flows across the cell, no matter the voltage level.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2024, 06:07:34 am by timeshell »

Online Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #130 on: November 01, 2024, 18:29:39 pm »
LM334 might be a better option.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #131 on: November 03, 2024, 23:10:06 pm »
Let's go another step further.  The chokes.  The chokes are intended to be mutually opposing.  We know they were different resistances, just slightly offset.  It just occurred to me why this is (again), but I think this may be more plausible.

We know the current must be miniscule when charging the water, otherwise the current will dissipate into electrolysis.  However, when the water is sufficiently charged, we need it to breakdown across the entire cell's gap and the current will need to be high enough at that point to do that.  Here is what I believe happens.  At the beginning of charging the cell, the voltage is low and the frequency is low.  And since the voltage is low, the current on the VIC should also be low as tuned by the chokes, low enough to prevent electrolysis.  But as the voltage increases at resonance, so will the current passing through the very slightly misaligned chokes.  Eventually, at a high enough voltage field to break the water across the gap, the current through the misalignment will grow enough to trigger the final breakdown and WHOOSH, the gas is produced, the voltage and current drops momentarily and then starts all over again.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #132 on: November 04, 2024, 04:29:52 am »

coupled inductors (chokes) = Flyback transformer in discontinuous mode. only 1 coil is operating and then stored energy is discharged to the other coil

https://www.coilcraft.com/en-us/edu/series/a-guide-to-flyback-transformers/

Online Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #133 on: November 04, 2024, 06:08:41 am »
I'm pretty sure it's not that simple.  There are a number of things going on with the VIC.

1.  The choke coils opposing mutual inductance choke current.
2.  Although the VIC is essentially a DC circuit, it contains a linear resonant AC pseudo circuit between the chokes and the WFC.
3.  The secondary coil's only purpose is to energize the pseudo circuit.
4.  The opposing mutually inductive chokes have slightly different inductances, so they don't completely choke all current.  They are likely designed this way for 2 reasons:
   a) to match the reactance of each side of the WFC to the same resonant frequency
   b) to leak current just enough to allow an eventual kick when the voltage is high enough to cause the complete breakdown of the dielectric property of the water in the gap of the WFC but not to allow electrolysis to occur while the voltage field is building up sufficiently for the given gap.
5.  The inductance of each choke needs to be tuned to a value similar to the inductance of the secondary coil in order to properly limit any current that the secondary coil may be inducing. It's in this way that the the opposing mutual inductance of the chokes on both sides of the secondary can suppress the current while allowing the voltage to build up.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2024, 22:27:42 pm by timeshell »

Online Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #134 on: November 06, 2024, 17:24:07 pm »
Oh, one more thing occurred to me.  I updated the previous post with point 5.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #135 on: November 08, 2024, 21:50:42 pm »

the oxygen atom wants free electrons, and they have to come from some where