From the previous document:
We have observed X-ray production with all four types of detectors described in Section 2.3.
There are three arguments for this statement: (a) the radiation was not affected by a strong magnet
placed between the sparking vessel and the detector, indicating that we are indeed dealing with the
X-rays or neutral particles; (b) the range measurements are very consistent with the X-ray
production; (c) the response from the gaseous detectors strongly indicates soft X-ray production
(pulses are comparable in size and shape to pulses from an Fe55 X-ray source). The X-rays were
monitored at 90o in respect to the spark axis during all tests in this paper.
That's comforting..... At least we now KNOW that I'm not on the wrong track
The problem is going to be ,keeping it going... New technology is being developed everyday... I'm very confident :
but unlike others.... I am not claiming I have it all figured out !
Just as those working with Stans stuff,without an understanding of what it is you are wanting to do will make it nearly impossible to succeed.You MUST understand WHAT and WHY it is you are wanting to do.
Also as with Stans stuff ,simply replicating the cell and electronics without understanding what and why you are trying to do is hopeless.
BTW .... Its the Stanford study you found most relevant to the x rayss.
