I do not have a business partner... me and max were doing work together and started off the with the approach of business partners but that never stemmed out to anything.. No ones business really but according to you it is..
People cant get stans circuits to work not because its no good.. but because they lack the patients, knowledge/ or experience to assemble it right.. My board is a replica so it needs to be set up with jumper wires just like stans and needs other circuits like the gating signal and the analog stuff.
The problems with my vic not making bubbles could be related to several things,
transformers not right, resonant cavity is not right, other never spoke of crucial electronics for proper functionality not presented or thought of..
Max never tried the circuits when i was using them even though i insisted him and ed should.. neither were interested in messing with and both were more interested in telling how to try it and do it.. I did my own studies and trials.. i did not get any results.. the circuit performed as described by stan and locks on but with no bubbles..
your email from max saying
"stating to me that slade effed up that board and he wont even use it"
could that be max saying he f'ed up that board for just the simple fact it did not have a result of lots of bubbles and that was max's assumption? well if its not working it must be because outlaw built the board wrong.. then you ask max " hey whats up with outlaws vic?" he blurts out how he feels its going.
This is the only thing i could see as max meaning by that because my board is not messed up! all the traces are correct. so max says something he believes based on my results ( no bubbles)
and you take it as gods honest truth literally that slade designed the board wrong.. then go run your mouth like you know what your talking about.
Ive actually drawn up 3 different Vics neal and the first one works too! here is a video of the second one! My third one was a replica layout!
But just so you know I dont give two craps what that email says with a guy i was working with (max) a couple years ago with initial business intentions that faded out to nothing .. I'm no ones business partner understand? Or do i need to say it another time?
I think this is all childish and wish i didnt have to sit here and defend myself.
In the beginning i had some issues with locking on at all because i had a wrong valued cap in the lock detection circuit.. fixed that.. not a trace error.. just a component value error..
The thing is im not out to make tons of money.. if it gets figured out by me or someone else i wouldnt mind making a well paid career or business opportunity out of it..
I'm not going to cater to people who buy the circuit i drew up..
If they are passionate about the circuit they bought they would be learning it like they should to truly understand the nature of the circuit.. so the fact they dont get a turn key circuit and have to put it together and learn it then get frustrated and say they got a junk circuit because they lack ability.. That's their problem.. I'm not here to hold people hands in learning. whos here to hold my hand?
Recently I started drawing a new Vic circuit that i think will be more versatile in experimenting with. Allowing advanced control of certain aspects of it.
this is more of a time to time hobby for me now and not a obsession..
but im sure if i stumble across results with my part time hobby or worthy new info it would become a obsession again.
But most of all its NOT a business for me like you KEEP trying to state.