@adys
I'm sure you didn't mean to offend but I'd like to clarify something. You implied in an earlier post that basically we're here randomly winding wires and have no clue. Although I am not an expert in the field, I have done a lot of study and learned a great deal about electronic "calculations" and equations for this project. I am not a wealthy man and cannot waste money on resources to randomly hope that my efforts will result in fruition. Although I am not personally offended by your comment, I did find your comment offensive to those of us who have spent a lot of time studying and trying to understand and replicate the application of the knowledge in the patents provided by Stan Meyer. A lot of information is provided but obviously the correct application is not so obvious. Otherwise it would have been replicated a long time ago. We have all been having to rediscover the process that Meyers applied.
I do appreciate your correcting information and would love to see the applied knowledge as proof. Until I see the proof however and am provided with the details to replicate it, the only other option is to continue with the knowledge I currently have until I am shown with evidence otherwise or until I discover evidence to the contrary.
I have no intention to offend or make presumptions in my response to you. But as seb and Steve pointed out, there are a lot of people who have claimed to be able to explain Meyeres process but didn't get anywhere.
The proof is in the pudding as the saying goes.
TS
