I've been re-reading the section Tri-Coil Construction in the section pertaining to Water Fuel Injection System P.6-3 ¶1 to p.6-4 ¶4 . Here, Meyers describes the coil implementation as it applies to the Water Fuel Injection System. The coil described does not look anything like the coil design indicated in Figure (3-23) of Memo WFC 422DA, the well known VIC 5 spool bobbin with rectangle core. Not only that, but the way it is wound is very interesting.
First, Meyers describes the choke windings. He used some sort of stainless steel wire, apparently very thin (.004) 37 gauge, and wound them apparently in a Tesla style bifilar pancake coil fashion. See
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,2638.0.html . Additionally, it seems that there were many of these pancake bifilar coils parallel to each other and sequentially connected to form the chokes. This is the first layer on the steel core. See P.6-3 ¶1.
The next layer on is the primary coil. It is wound AROUND the choke pancake coils in a more or less normal coil winding fashion using 20 gauge wire. P.6-3 ¶2
Finally, the secondary coil is wound AROUND the primary. Again, as with the chokes, it appears that the secondary is made of up multiple pancake coils wired in sequence. P.6-3 ¶3
Conclusions based on the above:
1. Not much current is being applied to the primary. The wire is small. Probably maximum of a couple amps.
2. Current on the secondary and chokes will likewise be very low as this wire would easily heat up and/or burn out with current above the milliamp range.
3. Bobbin style is probably not relevant
4. Pancake coils are used for augmenting or negating capacitive charge in the coils. This probably very significant. It also possibly means that the number of turns on each pancake coil may not be that high.
See Figure 6-1 on page 6-5 of the document "Birth of a New Technology".
TS
