0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Excellent verification adys15!! But more specifically, the WFC becomes more able to exercise resistance against the choke, the choke having less resistance due to higher surface area (skin effect) allowing a greater voltage potential to become established. I'm assuming you did the same number of turns with a similar core in both cases. Also, did you try reversing polarities on the chokes? I find that sometimes you'll get different results just by reversing the wires. Thanks!!TS
QuoteExcellent verification adys15!! But more specifically, the WFC becomes more able to exercise resistance against the choke, the choke having less resistance due to higher surface area (skin effect) allowing a greater voltage potential to become established. I'm assuming you did the same number of turns with a similar core in both cases. Also, did you try reversing polarities on the chokes? I find that sometimes you'll get different results just by reversing the wires. Thanks!!TSYea,a lot of bif winding by hand today... i used the same core wounded just end to end(it is a mini multicoil vic).I usualy hook the chokes out of phase.i tried in phase but it draws more curent from primary and it loses voltage a bit...The thin wire chokes i did not try them in phase...I put even a larger wire size 0.8mm,but acted worse like 0.4mm(the diference with 0.8 is that was on top of the secoundary,and the 0.4was stuck to the core...then on top primary,,and last layer secoundary...)I also tried bif chokes from speaker wire and got beter voltage..18v...I still dont get why i get over 1000v out of the secoundary on all freq ranges.More setups tomorow...
My experience suggests the coil layering is important also. The primary should always be on top of the secondary for the best power transfer. TS
QuoteMy experience suggests the coil layering is important also. The primary should always be on top of the secondary for the best power transfer. TSI did not try that, Stan had the primary between the sec and chokes,and i think that is more eficient because the 2 layers are pulsed'' 2 at once...Thanks fot sharing your thoughts.Cheers!
I just wanna jump in this thread to mention that all Stan's research is based on the concept and testing that can be found in the documents "Electrically Induced Explosions in Water" which can be found here on my website http://www.globalkast.com/docs/Electrically_Induced_Explosions_in_Water.zipBasically it says the cell has a very low resistance, usually less than 10 ohms. From what I can tell, they are charging the inductors and then allowing the stored energy to discharge into the cell.Another thing you can also say is that the Secondary is in Parallel with the cell, but the Inductors are in Series with the cell...kinda like a series-parallel circuit.