Author Topic: Tony's VIC and Results  (Read 18499 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4217
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2012, 19:41:47 pm »
Hello TS i found it on your channel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aro59wQo1gU&feature=plcp

Really interesting! Compliments!

What is the configuration of the circuit? what frequency is that happening? are you pulsing this coil in series with the cell? no vic?

Please explain a bit more how things are connected =)

Ps: this inspired me to finish the pll circuit.. i was only using the pll as a signal source never feeding it back.. too lazy...
Regards

Sebosfato



Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4787
    • water structure and science
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2012, 00:53:19 am »
Dito!

Nice work, mr Shell. ( Quick or Time)
Looking forward to see a video of yr production durIng resonance and also without resonance, including voltage/amperage input.

I do not want to be the party destroyer. If you get gas under special conditions, then you must research it futher in details! But always keep comparing strait DC vs. yr new setup and gas output.

Just some advise from an experienced tester, who did more then 1000 tests on hho..

Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2012, 01:02:33 am »
Dito!

Nice work, mr Shell. ( Quick or Time)
Looking forward to see a video of yr production durIng resonance and also without resonance, including voltage/amperage input.

I do not want to be the party destroyer. If you get gas under special conditions, then you must research it futher in details! But always keep comparing strait DC vs. yr new setup and gas output.

Just some advise from an experienced tester, who did more then 1000 tests on hho..

Steve

Lol

Thanks Steve, I am also a long time tester of HHO.  However, I stumbled on this just before a period where my time is severely limited.  As I have already mentioned, I fully intend to do some more experimentation and provide more results.  However in the meantime I have provided details I thought may interest everyone.

(lol @ Quick ... Time; timeshell name wasn't available on YouTube; funny since I made that name up a long time ago)

TS

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4787
    • water structure and science
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2012, 01:13:35 am »
Apple just presented the iphone 5.
Quicktime included....lol

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2012, 06:25:18 am »
What is the configuration of the circuit? what frequency is that happening? are you pulsing this coil in series with the cell? no vic?

As I explain in the video, the coil is wound with 5 strands in parallel.  These make up the actual VIC in they way they are connected.  So the cell and the VIC coils are connected exactly as Meyers describes.  The coils are around an air core wound bifilar style.  I estimate up to 250 turns.

Based on previous experiments with resonance on Charles Seiler's circuit and results I had when trying to step up this coil, I believe the number of turns on the secondary and the chokes may not actually have the effect on resonance that we are all expecting.  I will need to do more experiments to confirm this.

The cell I am using is a pair of stainless steel pipes, the inner is 1" long, the outer is 3/4" long (same as my other videos).

Water was originally distilled, although it is likely somewhat contaminated now.

The frequency varied but in phase lock it was between 1.8kHz and 2.2kHz (I need to confirm this).

You may have noticed in the video that when I first adjusted the frequency that it went in and out of resonance at first, but by the end of the video it was locked in resonance.

Gas was coming out the whole time, whether in resonance or not, but I think the point was at resonance it is the most efficient.  It was not an earth shattering amount of gas but it was a steady flow.  Quite frankly however, I'm not sure 1. That the VIC circuit is driving enough current to the primary and 2. The coil is optimized properly.   Again, more experimenting needs to be done.  However it seems to me that this VIC circuit would need to be scaled up for larger cells/applications somehow.

TS
« Last Edit: September 14, 2012, 02:53:43 am by timeshell »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2012, 20:30:53 pm »
Another quick video demonstrating the cell, scope, and VIC circuit.




TS

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
Re: Tony's VIC and Results
« Reply #22 on: September 13, 2012, 20:48:04 pm »
Another quick video demonstrating the cell, scope, and VIC circuit.




TS
Thanks for sharing!

Is it possible to zoom the scope on one step like charge signal? What is the max and min voltage? Where did you connect the scope probe?
Are you pulsing 5v?
What is the input pulse signal to the primary?

Yes, more questions...  8)

Br,
Webmug