@Tony: With my current experiments I currently don't use the SCR switching logic, I feed directly the waveform from a FG. So I'm testing just Stan's "Amp Inhibiting circuit".
As I again thought about the whole thing, I realized, that the only explanation is really, that the core losses are that low, which really is strange to me. But what's even stranger is the fact, that although the coils resonate at AC with the WFC in between, the WFC has only DC on it. IMHO this can only be explained by the huge capacity (supercapacitor) of the WFC compared to the small distributed capacity.
IMCHO (in my current humble opinion) I think that there are only 2 wirings which would make sense. One is a tank circuit with only the second choke (both chokes same polarity to the cell), the other is both coils just resonating in unisono together (different polarity to the cell). And especially for the second variant I would be very very interested on Don's answer on my question a page ago about the orientation. I would be really grateful to you Don, if you can answer this question.
EDIT:
While biking I realized why I needed just such a low current. Not because the loss percentage was so low, but because the oscillating energy is so low. The capacities are so small, that there's almost no energy oscillating. Therefore the needed input power is extremely low. This actually explains why Stan could us a core with such a small core area without saturating it. Although the energy say at 1000 volts will be 10'000 times more, it is still small, as the expected needed input current with the same oscillator would be then around 50mA.
