After the VIC fiasco and dead bodies and seeing the attitude of Dynodon I deduced that the only thing worth putting effort into with the name "meyers" on it was the Stephen Meyers design . His interview is also quite disturting to me .
I also notice that the relay isnt switching as fast as I tought before , this is simply the switching of polarity as described by Puharich maybe every 2 seconds of so ( much better )..., Stephen seems to have a double whammy in his cell , the *and/or* like Puharich says , switching AND ringing . Ringing "just as a tuning fork"
( magnetostrictive effect
) , alot of the elements of ss are magnetostrictive .
How can current carrying conductor @ a specific frequency act on *the shaking* , I dont think the is the intense static field @ 25 volts or so ... or perhaps it is the water wich is itself could physically oscillate wich shakes the electrodes ( phonons ) ... Stephen does REFER to the Puharich patent remember .
I modified my amp recently , have been getting mixed feelings over lateral fets , the old one is already obsolete , I use cheaper more common and using less components and more symetric . + I can pull 20 amps per channel easy .
Also , this is my theory If we had an hexagon with magnets at each node , the most efficient way to rotate or counter rotate while keeping the middle point steady that specific geometry would be a dual 3 phase system in phase opposite nodes , exactly like the tesla rotating egg , switch one phase egg will stop and reverse . Single phase can never be as efficient to for rotating machinery , I studied this principle mathematically infact with my big school book here . I have a hunch there is something quantum-mechanical going on with this particular 6 tuber , we have the rotating field from the 3 phases , the oscillating B field on the conductor . I wish I knew more about material science right here ....
