Yeah I already expected that there would be no demand . The little demand there will be will pay my tubes . I worked for a few months this year so thats cool
This is for scientific purposes , it is the tool I am making for me for the Stephen Meyers replication . I am not about to play with pulleys and 1000 watt motors to run 100 watts of electrolysis @ 400+ hertz . I am not doing any of Stan's junk , I am working on the 'quote : 'back to square one' design of his brother ..
If it can be done with an alternator , I will do it with my synthetizer , thats what puharich had , once its isolated theres no difference whatsoever . It will work just fine as is anyways if the impedance is meant to be matched , . The water bath has so little phase angle and capacitance anyways that it will do fine as is , It dont like pure capacitive phase angles but it can handle any type of coil as is or LRC as is , how do you think those little LRC signal generator experiments get done lol , little op amps have fets inside em . Transformers isolate AND can step up , so its a double wammy . Stan Meyers work revolves around high voltage .
A patent is an open ended book , those with 'skill in the art' can see variations of the system . As far as I know Stephen mentions a 3 phase generator , and hes running at 496 hz , times 2 , synchronized . He mentions higher voltage gets more gas , so hes stepping it up anyways .
Would it make more sense to you If I ghetto rigged a double belt driven pulley system @ 10:1 gear ratio , times 2 , well synched 20 volt alternators , operating from an inefficient single phase motor @ 1700 rpm in my house lol ?
.. oops the breaker busted again ...Sorry everybody , dont mind me Im doing some Stanley Meyers experiment ... Ermm can I run an extra wire from the kitche ? .... Ill pay the power bills promise ... OMG I told you guys , dont cook or make toasts when Im experimenting ... OMG FIRE FIRE ...