Rotary Pulse Voltage Frequency Generator Assembly

[Login to see usernames]

Steve, I guess you could measure the inductance after you build it, but before you build it... anyway I did some research and read half of a PHD thesis on it from some electrical engineer, and it was pretty complex, so oh well. I may just get an inductance meter when I'm rich...

Webmug, there are several differences between the Tesla bifilar and the chokes, and it is important to note that you don't want to cancel out any inductance, self inductance, or mutual inductance. the whole point of the chokes is to use a magnetic field to restrict the electrons movement.

You'll note that Tesla's bifilar coil is ONE coil, bifilar wound about itself,
where as these chokes are TWO coils, bifilar wound about each other.

Read again tesla's claims, the first one he is talking about increasing capacitance, this is also happening in stans coils, but tesla's is one coil and Stan's is two separate coils, and the second claim is for the two parts of the bifilar to be connected in series, while in stans they are not in series, there is a [water] capacitor in between. If you really wanted too you could wind each of stan's chokes bifilar like Tesla describes, and then the two chokes would never even touch each other.

"and the second claim is for the two parts of the bifilar to be connected in series, while in stans they are not in series, there is a [water] capacitor in between."

Why not Tesla Bifilar then, it creates even more potential charge?

Why did Stan used groves in a bobbin and connect L1-L2 bifilar spirals in series? ...now he created more capacitance (see it as spiral capacitors between the groves) and capacitors between the wires. You want to use the wire potential (capacitor) and overcome the capacitance of the WFC (ER) so HV potential can charge the WFC.

Remember, I could be way off track here, just thoughts?

br,
Webmug

[Login to see usernames]

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v81/bigbuba/demo.png)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v81/bigbuba/meyeralt.jpg)

Both of these pictures show the MOTORCRAFT RVIC!!!

NOT THE DELCO REMY

I know, it looks like a Delco, but, it's not. I just figured it out today.

Come to think of it, now knowing this, I don't know if Stan EVER used a Delco, because I am pretty sure that idea started from someone looking at that picture and thinking they saw a Delco even tho it never was!!!

It was always the Motorcraft RVIC.

First it was used like a normal deregulated alternator, hence that diagram, then it was rewound with the RVIC.

Remember that the famous  Demo Cell video was taken around 1990. This was way after the first video of it idling the dune buggy in 1984, and the boilerplate configuration in 1986. You look closely and you can figure it out, it's not actually a Delco, and it makes absolutely zero sense for it ever to be! This was the Motorcraft RVIC all along.

[Login to see usernames]

And I'd like to thank Hydro and Dynodon, with your subtle hints from other things I never would have pieced this together and come to this realization!

THANKS!

[Login to see usernames]

Both of these pictures show the MOTORCRAFT RVIC!!!

NOT THE DELCO REMY

I know, it looks like a Delco, but, it's not. I just figured it out today.

Come to think of it, now knowing this, I don't know if Stan EVER used a Delco, because I am pretty sure that idea started from someone looking at that picture and thinking they saw a Delco even tho it never was!!!

It was always the Motorcraft RVIC.

First it was used like a normal deregulated alternator, hence that diagram, then it was rewound with the RVIC.

Remember that the famous  Demo Cell video was taken around 1990. This was way after the first video of it idling the dune buggy in 1984, and the boilerplate configuration in 1986. You look closely and you can figure it out, it's not actually a Delco, and it makes absolutely zero sense for it ever to be! This was the Motorcraft RVIC all along.

It does look that way. I don't think it is paramount that a person needs to use a particular brand of alternator except for replication's sake. You can wire a Delco just the same as a Motorcraft or any brand. I admit that I would like to see if there is any difference between the two but, I really don't think it will make much of a difference if any at all. I do favor the connection scheme and internal design on the Motorcraft though.

[Login to see usernames]

I agree it's a minor detail, but it clears up a whole misunderstanding about Stan's alternator.

You can use a delco remy... if you wire it like the RVIC, this just clears up the whole myth that Stan used a normal delco.

I know I haven't provided an in depth explanation, but those that care to understand will understand, and for them I think this is good to know

[Login to see usernames]

i was reading throught this thread and saw that stan used a ford aircraft alternator

if that is true he was mostly using a 400 hz alternator   most aviation and military stuff is 400 hz

[Login to see usernames]

That was the understanding at one point, but then we learned more, and we're pretty sure it's just a normal car alternator made by motorcraft, which is identical to what i have except for my brushes.

The frequency of it, I don't know, but I don't see any reason to believe he used an aircraft alternator any more, now that we've discovered the automobile version of that alternator

[Login to see usernames]

both cases are the same the diffrence in a 400hz and 60 hz one is the diode bridge and the rotor

 the rotor would be diffrent in the 400 hz version which is interchangeable with ford case