Author Topic: stevie1001 tubecell  (Read 26260 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4540
    • water structure and science
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #40 on: December 26, 2007, 22:54:55 pm »
today I did some gasoutput tests.
They are done with the famous bottle upsidedown filled with water.

The first test was done with strait dc  = gasoutput 0.25 liter per minute
Second test with alternator                 = gasoutput 0.32 liter per minute

br
Steve

keithturtle

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #41 on: December 28, 2007, 03:58:34 am »
How many amps did the ampeater eat?

mL produced / minutes / watts (volts x amps applied, average for time of run)

mL/min/watt is the metric I like to use to quantify output.  This is a straightforward approach to cell quantification.   Ain't foolproof, but gives a picture of what yer doin'.

The best I've done yet is 4.2 m/m/w.

It be interesting to ck yer numbers.

Thanks,

Turtle, still testing

kumaran

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #42 on: December 28, 2007, 04:51:17 am »
Hi keithturtle,

Steve's cell efficient as below :

Test 1 (with straight DC)
Volt : 12
Amps : 18
LPM : 0.25
Efficiency (Wh/L) : 14.40
Efficiency (mL/W/H) : 69.44
Percentage compared to Faraday : 16.33%

Test 2 (with alternator)
Volt : 20
Amps : 21
LPM : 0.32
Efficiency (Wh/L) : 21.88
Efficiency (mL/W/H) : 45.71
Percentage compared to Faraday : 10.75%

keithturtle

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #43 on: December 28, 2007, 08:50:00 am »
Thanks for the numbers... we still have a ways to go.

Turtle

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4540
    • water structure and science
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #44 on: December 28, 2007, 10:16:13 am »
We have, Turtle, we have.

As I said, i do not use KOH.


Listen all of you: My alternator used on my like 8V and 3 amps. What I published on the excelsheet was what went into the WFC.
So, what is the reall powerconsumption?

Br
Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4540
    • water structure and science
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #45 on: February 02, 2008, 21:25:01 pm »
Hi all,


Its getting better and better   ;D :D ;)

The interesting thing is that the WFC is producing almost always the same gas output...(0.25ltr/minute) (except with alternator 0.32l/m) . Only the power to get it, changes.

My results are so far:

Test 1 (with straight DC)
Volt : 12
Amps : 18
LPM : 0.25
Efficiency (Wh/L) : 14.40
Efficiency (mL/W/H) : 69.44
Percentage compared to Faraday : 16.33%

Test 2 (with alternator)
Volt : 20
Amps : 21
LPM : 0.32
Efficiency (Wh/L) : 21.88
Efficiency (mL/W/H) : 45.71
Percentage compared to Faraday : 10.75%

Test 3 (with SSRelais, 1khz pulsing and coil in parallel with WFC)
Volt : 12
Amps : 6.0 !!!!!!
LPM : 0.25
Efficiency (Wh/L) : 4,8
Efficiency (mL/W/H) : 208,33
Percentage compared to Faraday : 49%

It is such a good feeling that I am beating strait DC with big numbers at this moment.
I have now a very good direction for futher developing efficiency!


Br
Steve
« Last Edit: February 03, 2008, 01:00:06 am by stevie1001 »

keithturtle

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #46 on: February 03, 2008, 04:07:46 am »
Keep at it , man... we'll git there!

Turtle

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 51
    • WaterfuelForAll
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #47 on: February 03, 2008, 12:35:16 pm »

Test 3 (with SSRelais, 1khz pulsing and coil in parallel with WFC)
Volt : 12
Amps : 6.0 !!!!!!
LPM : 0.25
Efficiency (Wh/L) : 4,8
Efficiency (mL/W/H) : 208,33
Percentage compared to Faraday : 49%
Steve

That's EXCELLENT!   :o
Can you maybe post a schematic of the complete setup?
If you don't mind, I would love to give it a try myself.....

Wouter