Stanley Meyer > Cracked!!!!!

Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!

<< < (2/14) > >>

hydro:
What the guy is saying is he cracked water with little or hardly any amps at all with high voltage, he says the gas does not look like much but when you measure its output for some reason its rediculusly high!

Steve is emailing him, i ask for him to find his production, and transformer type. The information on that page has been backed up and saved and if the guy seems to be legit it will be tested, "not by me", i have to much on my hands right now, and i dont have the money to test every device someone claims to be overunity.

My point of  view is if You, or That Guy made water resonate with high voltage and low amps then this is something stan didn't do, therfor your the one that deserves the pat on the back. But this is just my point of view. I have tested this technology Long enough to understand stan LOVED his amp flow to his cell, matter of fact he could get more amps to the cell than we can, how he does it? im still working on it. But high volts low amps, you gots to prove me wrong, i say it cant be done, and i say stan didn't do this but his way of distraction! Anyways, you guys have the rest of your life to prove me wrong with using high voltage low amps to crack water, if you succeed i wouldn't be suprised.

I will end this post by saying, Test Report of Evaulation Page 60... 12.5 Volts 40 Amps 500 Watts 7 liters a Min. Now thats 4.4 amps per tube, 55 watts per tube.

Can you make 1 tube consume 4.4 amps with olmost an 8th inch gap?
How was that high volts low amps?

kinesisfilms:
i look forward to what you have to offer h2opower....no one ever seems to want to hear anything differnet then the general populous.....for some reason certain events have been hushing the people on the soapboxes.......and hydrocars, i do not know as to why your thought process has turned to a destructive path in stanley meyers work....lets not stomp our feet and declare sour grapes.

hydro:
right on h20! yes it may be sad, but i have a path just like you do. I have been so far into stans work i cant even begin to explain to anyone the facts so i don't bother. I can understand why you would think that stan used high voltage low amps, for one this is a big problem, because if stan used high voltage low amps, and if he did find the resonate Freq of wator than he never would have had that big clunky alternator on his dune buggy to start with, nor the clunky driver motor or that clunky rotory converter.

i pointed out that stans "tube" consumes 4.4 amps per tube, 40 amps for all 9 tubes and it is also in his test of evaulation. I am currently working on "how to make them tubes consume that while others are busy on the chase for resonation", they dont yet realize how hard it is to make a tube with such a gap consume that,  and to be honest i've done a pretty damn good job at doing it... So far i have ran an engine on as little as 500 cc's a min by ionizing the gas just like stan did, and herman, converting good ol 1h to 2h.. so basicly stan and herman did the same thing when making isotop hydrogen, when you read the patents you have to kinda read between the lines, when herman refers to 2h hard water he is actually meaning hydrogen with neutrons in it, which is 2h, just what stan used. the problem is the 2H is not volitile like gasoline but like deisel, this is where herman used Xrays and stan lasers, they both altered the gas and stans methode was the vic, this is where you're seeing high voltage low amps with resonate frequencies, the gas charges, it dont cost anything to ionize the gas.

now i've pointed out the test on page 60, and there is enough information there "math" ,"definitions", how too's on that page for you to actually replicate The test of stans in which he is explaining by using a 1 liter cavity. in which where stan produced 7 liters a min using a 1 liter cavity where 1 psi is = to 1 liter of hydroxy is "impossible", how do i know? well i tested it and confirmed it was impossible, this means if stan would have told the truth in that test of evaluation then his work would have been easily cracked, this is why he hollared 7 liters a min, but sadly when you use the math and conduct the test it tells no lie. My ideals and road of direction is based on facts, what was left behind and what is as well as what is possible and what is not possible.

I respect the ones thats trying to find the resonate freq of wator, if they succeed then they will be the wator gods! But im sorry to hear you think stan broke water with resonance and at the same time im happy that you're working on breaking water with resonance.  anyhow, this is no longer my forum, i chose to step down while the destraction was at work. i'm already making ways to do the possible.

if i have come across harsh in any way then honestly i do not mean to, sometimes my way of wording is not that great, i am just getting across to you that i am not on the same road your on, eventually when people do start to realize what is what, i might not be around.

god bless your tubes man.

hydro:

--- Quote from: kinesisfilms on June 24, 2008, 08:36:36 am ---i look forward to what you have to offer h2opower....no one ever seems to want to hear anything differnet then the general populous.....for some reason certain events have been hushing the people on the soapboxes.......and hydrocars, i do not know as to why your thought process has turned to a destructive path in stanley meyers work....lets not stomp our feet and declare sour grapes.

--- End quote ---

it hasn't, i just understand what you dont.

kinesisfilms:
whos forum is this now?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version