Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
General Discussion / Re: S1R9A9M9 18HP Briggs riding mower engine ran on water( 2008)
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 19:39:30 »
Dec 1, 2023, I just built the step up type transformer recently. It is not an autotransformer. This one is a small pulse type with 4 terminals. It uses the Amazon ferrite set with bobbin called E I 40 with hand wound wires 15 turns and 60 turns for 1:4 ratio, and needs to be tested , so as proper 24kv plasma path would be available for the following 6 amps through spark plug. The Primary would spark to ground with 2mm 6kv spark gap . By the way, this would also fit inside the plastic deli tub like Nathren used in 2008 with the S1R coils assembly and relay, spark gap, diodes, etc.
2
Sebosfato / Re: My new approach
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 05:54:35 »
10 years ago i started considering using magnets with coils with cores to rectify current

After i discovered that the magnet double the flux swing in one direction and saturate directly in the other direction back in 2012

I found this by pulsing a toroid unipolarly and adding a magnet would halve the consumed current while raise the voltage output.. you can see the video on youtube magnet effect on pulsed current

Now i want to hook this magnetic diode as if it was the primary coil to test

So both primaries will have double magnetic swing

3
Sebosfato / Re: My new approach
« Last post by Login to see usernames on Yesterday at 00:01:48 »
You seem to be generating some lot of gas ... can you please tell us what you say in the video?

4
Sebosfato / Re: My new approach
« Last post by Login to see usernames on December 01, 2023, 18:22:29 pm »
video
5
General Discussion / Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Last post by Login to see usernames on December 01, 2023, 18:19:07 pm »
I don't agree. Current is the number of electrons through a cross section per unit time. Stanley prevented the current, that is, made it less than 1 ampere.
For Faraday electrolysis, electrons are useful, so the current there is up to 20 amperes and higher. For Meyer's voltrolysis, electrons are harmful, so it was made at less than 1 ampere
6
General Discussion / Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 30, 2023, 08:51:41 am »
Yes, that true.
I think that the effect that we are looking for, is the electron avalance...
The old documents all state that we need to align the molecules first.
Thats the electrolysis part, even if it is just for a very short periode in thime.
Then the BEMF pulse from all coils involved come quickly afterwards and hit the electrons from the molecules, as stated by Stan.And there is the where the overunity effects comes from.
The electron avalance.

cheers!
7
General Discussion / Re: why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 30, 2023, 00:24:48 am »
Yes… i think so too..

but the mean free path limit that speed dissipating…
8
General Discussion / why Stanley used Higher Voltage....
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 28, 2023, 21:06:46 pm »
the higher the voltage, the faster the electrons move. This is because the electric field increases their kinetic energy.
9
Sebosfato / Re: My new approach
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 27, 2023, 03:46:22 am »
I was not able to generate the gated signal with same timer... each timer generate only one frequency at time...

So the options is to count the pulses but i was not able to get any precision

The only way to make it work would be with some external programable divider maybe...

The thing is that i dont want the gate to change the pulse caracteristcs like pulse modulating the last pulse... the pll chip dont do it for example..

However getting this pulses to be 180 dephased and have the pulses to have overlaping duty cycle is a hell of chalenge when combining with the gate if we want the pulses to not being cut out of timing...

If the pulses are cut out of time it may be easier to get things burned...


10
General Discussion / Re: S1R9A9M9 18HP Briggs riding mower engine ran on water( 2008)
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 24, 2023, 17:42:59 pm »
The Briggs Magnetron only fires a spark gap as maximum 16,000 volts. I tested this recently as  (3kv per millimeter gap.)  As 5 1/2 mm gap max  in open air .  No more. The system is lacking the higher volts for the proper plasma path for amps to pass through spark plug. The back EMF of a coil parts and parts for a capacitor charge and discharge would not fit into the deli tub as used originally in the 2008 you tube videos of 18HP running on water in carb. Therefore, what was used in 2008, was a pulse step up transformer somewhat similar to the S1R9A9M9 magnetic coils would fit along side it, along with a few other small parts. I even had added narrow Neodymium magnets glued on over top of my own  flywheel magnet on 12HP to get greater field strength.  Of course, a car ignition coil could substitute , but not wanted, since the free energy spinning magnet runs the ignition coil (original type) Magnetron autotransformer. Armature gap was about .012" to flywheel. A higher field in theory, would generate higher volts in primary, which generates higher than -130 volts back EMF to run the secondary of auto transformer, but of course would slightly adjust the timing. That did not work for > 16kv. I just built the step up type unit  recently.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10